pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1905.05667 · v2 · submitted 2019-05-14 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.ML

Recognition: unknown

Evaluation Metrics for Unsupervised Learning Algorithms

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.LG stat.ML
keywords clusteringalgorithmslearningqualityresultstechniquesunsupervisedalgorithmic
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Determining the quality of the results obtained by clustering techniques is a key issue in unsupervised machine learning. Many authors have discussed the desirable features of good clustering algorithms. However, Jon Kleinberg established an impossibility theorem for clustering. As a consequence, a wealth of studies have proposed techniques to evaluate the quality of clustering results depending on the characteristics of the clustering problem and the algorithmic technique employed to cluster data.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Rank, Don't Generate: Statement-level Ranking for Explainable Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The work reframes explainable recommendation as statement-level ranking, introduces the StaR benchmark from Amazon reviews, and finds popularity baselines outperforming SOTA models in item-level personalized ranking.

  2. Context-KG: Context-Aware Knowledge Graph Visualization with User Preferences and Ontological Guidance

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Context-KG uses LLMs to extract user preferences and context from natural language, driving ontology-guided layouts and insights for knowledge graph visualization that improve interpretability and task performance ove...