Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Quantum-inspired algorithms in practice

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.10415 v3 pith:4MZMBU5K submitted 2019-05-24 quant-ph cs.DS

classification quant-phcs.DS
keywords algorithmsperformancepracticequantum-inspiredanalysisboundscomparedcomplexity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the practical performance of quantum-inspired algorithms for recommendation systems and linear systems of equations. These algorithms were shown to have an exponential asymptotic speedup compared to previously known classical methods for problems involving low-rank matrices, but with complexity bounds that exhibit a hefty polynomial overhead compared to quantum algorithms. This raised the question of whether these methods were actually useful in practice. We conduct a theoretical analysis aimed at identifying their computational bottlenecks, then implement and benchmark the algorithms on a variety of problems, including applications to portfolio optimization and movie recommendations. On the one hand, our analysis reveals that the performance of these algorithms is better than the theoretical complexity bounds would suggest. On the other hand, their performance as seen in our implementation degrades noticeably as the rank and condition number of the input matrix are increased. Overall, our results indicate that quantum-inspired algorithms can perform well in practice provided that stringent conditions are met: low rank, low condition number, and very large dimension of the input matrix. By contrast, practical datasets are often sparse and high-rank, precisely the type that can be handled by quantum algorithms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. High-rate qLDPC processors

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Non-abelian "mitten" qLDPC codes achieve 20% encoding rate with distances 10-24 on 150-975 qubits, and simulations indicate fault-tolerant processors sustaining ~10^10 logical operations at 0.1% physical error rate.

  2. Quantum Expectation-Maximization for Gaussian Mixture Models

    quant-ph 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A quantum EM algorithm fits Gaussian mixture models with per-iteration runtime polylogarithmic in the number of samples and polynomial in other parameters, under quantum access to the data.

  3. A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage

    quant-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A single-author review of all quantum computational advantage claims to date, their classical refutations, and the progress of quantum error correction.

Pith tools