pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1906.09821 · v1 · submitted 2019-06-24 · 💻 cs.CL

Recognition: unknown

Classification and Clustering of Arguments with Contextualized Word Embeddings

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords argumentpercentagepointscontextualizedwordargumentsclassificationclustering
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We experiment with two recent contextualized word embedding methods (ELMo and BERT) in the context of open-domain argument search. For the first time, we show how to leverage the power of contextualized word embeddings to classify and cluster topic-dependent arguments, achieving impressive results on both tasks and across multiple datasets. For argument classification, we improve the state-of-the-art for the UKP Sentential Argument Mining Corpus by 20.8 percentage points and for the IBM Debater - Evidence Sentences dataset by 7.4 percentage points. For the understudied task of argument clustering, we propose a pre-training step which improves by 7.8 percentage points over strong baselines on a novel dataset, and by 12.3 percentage points for the Argument Facet Similarity (AFS) Corpus.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Community-Based Approach for Stance Distribution and Argument Organization

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Unsupervised graph community detection organizes arguments to reveal stance distributions in debates.