pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.12001 · v1 · pith:34MT5OO2new · submitted 2019-06-28 · 💻 cs.NI · eess.SP

Towards Large-Scale Autonomous Wireless Sensor Networks

Francesco Fraternali This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 13:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NI eess.SP
keywords wireless sensor networksautonomous systemsInternet of Thingslarge-scale deploymentsself-managementnetwork automationstructural health monitoring
0
0 comments X

The pith

Wireless sensor networks must add self-management features to scale to thousands of IoT nodes without constant human oversight.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

As wireless sensor networks expand to support the Internet of Things, deployments of hundreds or thousands of nodes make manual configuration and maintenance impractical, especially for tasks such as battery replacement in remote infrastructure. The paper identifies the core autonomy capabilities needed, including self-status checks, self-reconfiguration, and automated problem resolution. It then contrasts these requirements against existing large-scale real-world WSN installations and concludes that current systems still depend too heavily on human intervention to guarantee reliable data collection. A reader would care because this gap limits the practical reach of sensor networks in civil monitoring and similar applications.

Core claim

Achieving autonomous large-scale wireless sensor networks requires implementing features that let the system check its own status, reconfigure itself, and fix major problems, yet comparisons to state-of-the-art deployments show that these capabilities remain insufficient to reduce human intervention while preserving data-gathering and reliability functions.

What carries the argument

The set of autonomy features for self-status monitoring, self-reconfiguration, and automated fault correction, assessed via direct comparison to existing large-scale WSN deployments.

If this is right

  • Battery replacement and other maintenance tasks in applications such as bridge monitoring could become feasible at scale.
  • Network managers could oversee far larger arrays without proportional increases in effort.
  • Data collection and reliability could continue even when direct human access is limited or impossible.
  • Overall system burden would drop enough to support hundreds or thousands of nodes in IoT settings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These autonomy features could enable sensor networks in locations where frequent human visits are impractical.
  • Combining the features with emerging low-power protocols might further extend operational lifetimes.
  • Simulation of the proposed autonomy mechanisms at thousand-node scale could reveal hidden bottlenecks before hardware trials.
  • The same self-management logic might apply to other distributed sensing systems beyond traditional WSNs.

Load-bearing premise

The identified autonomy features can be implemented at large scale without compromising core data-gathering and reliability functions.

What would settle it

A working deployment of several thousand sensor nodes that achieves near-full autonomy with minimal ongoing human input while keeping data accuracy and network uptime at current levels would support the claim; persistent high human intervention after adding the features would falsify it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.12001 by Francesco Fraternali.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Interactions between various EEHF algo￾rithms showed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Energy-harvesting node architecture To verify and evaluate the energy-harvesting building mon￾itoring architecture, authors implement three new sensors that represent three points in the design space: a vibration detector, an airflow meter, and a light/occupancy sensor. Each sensor is designed to monitor a particular phenomenon common to buildings and all of them are going to be powered by a solar harvesti… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: SBFD framework on the routing path of the packet update the path check￾sum using their node ID and the current path checksum as inputs to the Fletcher checksum algorithm. When a packet arrivals at the sink, the path checksum is used to determine the packet path by means of look-up in the NDB. The NDB is pre-populated with the paths and path checksums for the network based on its known topology and NPA. The… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Network layout: (a) Initial network lay [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 3D model of Paddington station main box and WSN layout. Network: The tilt and displacement sensors used in the de￾ployment were obtained from Wisen Innovation. These sen￾sors are commercially available and designed for use on con￾struction sites and are packaged in robust metal housings. Internally the devices are based on the AVR ATmega1281 processor and the IEEE 802.15.4-compliant AT86RF231 ra￾dio. Fifte… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Piloteur architecture • The configuration service is the first to be activated: it finds a nodes configuration file on the configuration node, downloads the file, and configures the endpoint and its drivers. Then, it continuously checks for config￾uration or software updates. The configuration service helps scale deployments up to dozens or hundreds of nodes with only marginal increases in setup and con￾fi… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Synergy Occupancy Sensor presented in [8] Occupancy Detection Algorithm: The combination of the reed switch and the PIR sensors together improve the accuracy of the occupancy detection. The reed switch is able to sense when the door is open or closed. When the door is open, we mark the room as occupied since for the authors in typical office building an open door denotes the occupant being in the office or… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Building Blocks of the UCSD Network[9] 4.1 Building Occupancy System The primary goal of the Wireless Sensor Network deployed at the second floor of the Computer Science Department at UCSD is to detect occupancy inside the building. By do￾ing this, the network acquires the necessary information to turn on the HVAC system in a specific area only when it is needed allowing energy saving in the building. The … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have the goal of gathering data from the environment. The advent of the Internet of Things (IoT) drastically changed WSN's vision that, as never before, needs to expand and include hundreds or thousands of sensors. But to follow the current IoT trends new techniques need to be implemented since orders of thousands of sensor nodes are not manageable by today's WSNs systems that often rely on manual configuration and hence are not practical. As an example, the replacement of batteries of thousand of nodes could be extremely arduous or even impossible for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructures (i.e. bridges, towers). Hence, the solution to the growing burden of the system manager is automation, allowing the system to check its own status, to re-configure itself and fix the major problems in the network whenever it is possible. In this paper, we present and discuss the main features needed to achieve an autonomous large scale WSN. Furthermore, we compare these features with the state of the art of real-world large scale WSN deployments showing that further solutions are needed to drastically reduce human intervention while guaranteeing the main functionalities of the system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that large-scale WSNs for IoT applications require new automation techniques because manual configuration and maintenance (e.g., battery replacement in structural health monitoring) become impractical at scales of hundreds or thousands of nodes. It identifies and discusses the main features needed for autonomy, qualitatively compares these features against state-of-the-art real-world large-scale WSN deployments, and concludes that further solutions are required to drastically reduce human intervention while preserving core data-gathering and reliability functions.

Significance. If the qualitative comparison holds, the manuscript usefully frames autonomy requirements for scaling WSNs and highlights gaps relative to existing deployments. As a discussion piece synthesizing domain knowledge, it could guide research priorities in self-configuring and self-healing networks, though its impact is limited by the absence of new data, models, or quantitative evidence.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrasing 'drastically changed WSN's vision that, as never before, needs to expand' is grammatically awkward and could be revised for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and the recommendation of minor revision. The manuscript is positioned as a discussion and synthesis piece whose primary contribution is to identify autonomy requirements and qualitatively map them against existing large-scale deployments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper is a review/discussion piece identifying autonomy features for large-scale WSNs and qualitatively comparing them to state-of-the-art deployments. It advances no equations, parameters, derivations, predictions, or technical claims whose validity depends on self-referential fitting or self-citation chains. The central statement is an observational call for additional research resting on external comparisons, with no load-bearing steps that reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on the domain assumption that manual configuration is unsustainable at scale; no free parameters, new entities, or additional axioms are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Current WSN systems rely on manual configuration which is impractical for thousands of nodes.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the core motivation for automation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5722 in / 1028 out tokens · 28149 ms · 2026-05-25T13:58:59.080144+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Towards Large-Scale Autonomous Wireless Sensor Networks

    INTRODUCTION In the last decade, the wireless sensor network field has evolved to the point where it is possible to deploy sensor- node applications over a long period of time with the expec- tation that they will work to produce useful, scientifically- relevant data. Driven by the need to collect data about peo- ple behavior and health status, WSNs for hea...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  2. [2]

    While looking at how to maintain a large scale WSN a lot of work is still missing

    HOW TO: LONG-LIVED LARGE-SCALE WSN As previously mentioned, over the past years a lot of work has been addressed in the literature on improving WSN sys- tems, but most of the projects have been evaluated only in small networks or within simulations. While looking at how to maintain a large scale WSN a lot of work is still missing. In this section, we are ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The nodes can then volunteer to accept a workload L proportional to the energy availability consumption or go to sleep otherwise

    In-network Averaging: Rather than explicitly transfer- ring the effective energy available calculated E at each node to a central scheduling entity, EEHF circulates the infor- mation about the average E and maximum of E among all nodes. The nodes can then volunteer to accept a workload L proportional to the energy availability consumption or go to sleep ot...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Then, a dis- tributed route discovery algorithm chooses a minimum cost route without the framework having to explicitly provide for the sharing of information

    Distributed Scheduler: Certain tasking algorithms learn the local energy costs on their own as required. Then, a dis- tributed route discovery algorithm chooses a minimum cost route without the framework having to explicitly provide for the sharing of information. Authors compare the performance of EEHF and a residual energy based scheme, for routing. Sim...

    work page

  5. [5]

    In par- ticular, we are going to focus on how the following WSNs manage the features presented in Section 2 in order to be- come autonomous

    REAL-WORLD AUTONOMOUS LARGE- SCALE WSN In this section, we present the state of the art of real-world large scale deployments of wireless sensor networks. In par- ticular, we are going to focus on how the following WSNs manage the features presented in Section 2 in order to be- come autonomous. 3.1 Cross-rails: Authors in [50] deploy a WSN in an excavatio...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Overall, our network is composed of three main parts: a basic sensor- node, the base station and the monitoring-storage system as shown in Figure 8

    THE OCCUPANCY DETECTION NETWORK A T UCSD In this section, we describe our architecture and the mon- itoring framework used to obtain our results. Overall, our network is composed of three main parts: a basic sensor- node, the base station and the monitoring-storage system as shown in Figure 8. Figure 8: Building Blocks of the UCSD Network[9] 4.1 Building ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Furthermore, we compare these features with the state of the art of real-world large scale deployments analyzed in Section 3

    CONCLUSION AND FUTURE CHALLENGES In this paper, we analyzed the main features needed to achieve an autonomous large scale WSN. Furthermore, we compare these features with the state of the art of real-world large scale deployments analyzed in Section 3. The result of the analysis is showed on Table 4. Table 4 shows that all the real-world large scale netwo...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Hence, the current state of technology in energy harvesting is still unable to provide sustained energy supply to enable WSNs continuously

    Energy-Harvesting: commercial energy harvesting avail- able systems are cumbersome, expensive and still in the development phase towards improvements in power output that in the of the art presents a few tens of µW. Hence, the current state of technology in energy harvesting is still unable to provide sustained energy supply to enable WSNs continuously. F...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Self-Repairing: after a failure has been detected at any level, the system has to be able to manage it and re- cover the main functionalities whenever it is possible. In the past years, numerous fault detection techniques have been developed in the literature but self-repairing methods need to be improved in order for a network to long-live and reach auto...

    work page

  10. [10]

    A clear organization of the data can also facilitate monitoring and fault detection techniques that check for the correctness of the data and hence enabling maintenance

    Network Scaling, Aggregation and Management: The management of thousands of sensors from different sources that continuously produce relevant data can be ex- tremely hard if the network and system do not scale well. A clear organization of the data can also facilitate monitoring and fault detection techniques that check for the correctness of the data and ...

    work page

  11. [11]

    John Feminella, Devika Pisharoty, and Kamin Whitehouse. 2014. Piloteur: a lightweight platform for pilot studies of smart homes. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Embedded Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings (BuildSys ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 110-119

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    @scale: Insights from a Large, Long-lived Appliance Energy WSN

    D AWSON -H AGGERTY , S., L ANZISERA , S., T ANEJA , J., B ROWN , R., AND C ULLER , D. @scale: Insights from a Large, Long-lived Appliance Energy WSN. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (2012), ACM, pp. 37ˆ a˘A¸ S48

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    Bernheim Brush, Evgeni Filippov, Danny Huang, Jaeyeon Jung, Ratul Mahajan, Frank Martinez, Khurshed Mazhar, Amar Phanishayee, Arjmand Samuel, James Scott, and Rayman Preet Singh

    A.J. Bernheim Brush, Evgeni Filippov, Danny Huang, Jaeyeon Jung, Ratul Mahajan, Frank Martinez, Khurshed Mazhar, Amar Phanishayee, Arjmand Samuel, James Scott, and Rayman Preet Singh. 2013. Lab of things: a platform for conducting studies with connected devices in multiple homes. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous comput...

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Dixon, Colin, et al. ”An operating system for the home.” Proceedings of the 9th USENIX conference on Features/Systems Cross-Rail @scale Piloteur Lab of Things OurSystem Aggregation x x x Simple setup x Self-repairing x Management x x x x Scalability x x x x Remote access for fixes and updates x x x x x Simple Application Development x Energy Harvesting Tab...

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    A. J. Brush, B. Lee, R. Mahajan, S. Agarwal, S. Saroiu, and C. Dixon. Home Automation in the Wild: Challenges and Opportunities. In CHI , 2011

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    K. L. Calvert, W. K. Edwards, and R. E. Grinter. Moving Toward the Mid- dle: The Case Against the End-to-End Argument in home networking. In HotNets, 2007

    work page 2007

  17. [17]

    Werner-Allen, G.; Lorincz, K.; Ruiz, M.; Marcillo, O.; Johnson, J.; Lees, J.; Welsh, M., Deploying a wireless sensor network on an active volcano , in Internet Computing, IEEE , vol.10, no.2, pp.18-25, March-April 2006

    work page 2006

  18. [18]

    Yuvraj Agarwal, Bharathan Balaji, Rajesh Gupta, Jacob Lyles, Michael Wei, and Thomas Weng. 2010. Occupancy-driven energy management for smart building automation. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Building (BuildSys ’10)

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    Yuvraj Agarwal, Rajesh Gupta, Daisuke Komaki, and Thomas Weng. 2012. BuildingDepot: an extensible and distributed architecture for building data storage, access and sharing. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings (BuildSys ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 64-71

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Stephen Dawson-Haggerty, Xiaofan Jiang, Gilman Tolle, Jorge Ortiz, and David Culler. 2010. sMAP: a simple measurement and actuation profile for physical information. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 197-210

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    Sensor Andrew: Large-scale Campus-wide Sensing and Actua- tion

    R OWE , A., B ERGES , M., B HATIA , G., G OLDMAN , E., R A - JKUMAR , R., G ARRETT , J., M OURA , J., AND S OIBELMAN , L. Sensor Andrew: Large-scale Campus-wide Sensing and Actua- tion. IBM Journal of Research and Development 55, 1.2 (2011), 6ˆ a˘A¸ S1

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    JeongGil Ko; Chenyang Lu; Srivastava, M.B.; Stankovic, J.A.; Terzis, A.; Welsh, M., ”Wireless Sensor Networks for Healthcare,” in Proceedings of the IEEE , vol.98, no.11, pp.1947-1960, Nov. 2010

    work page 1947

  23. [23]

    ICWMC ’08

    de Brito, L.M.P.; Peralta, L.M.R.; Santos, F.E.S.; Fernandes, R.P.R., ”Wireless Sensor Networks Applied to Museums’ Environmental Monitoring,” in Wireless and Mobile Communications , 2008. ICWMC ’08. The Fourth International Conference on , vol., no., pp.364-369, July 27 2008-Aug

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    WCICA 2004

    Ruizhong Lin; Zhi Wang; Youxian Sun, ”Wireless sensor networks solutions for real time monitoring of nuclear power plant,” in Intelligent Control and Automation, 2004. WCICA 2004

    work page 2004

  25. [25]

    IPDPS 2006

    Langendoen, K.; Baggio, A.; Visser, O., ”Murphy loves potatoes: experiences from a pilot sensor network deployment in precision agriculture,” in Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 2006. IPDPS 2006. 20th International , vol., no., pp.8 pp.-, 25-29 April 2006

    work page 2006

  26. [26]

    Tang, V.W.S.; Yuan Zheng; Jiannong Cao, ”An Intelligent Car Park Management System based on Wireless Sensor Networks,” in Pervasive Computing and Applications, 2006 1st International Symposium on , vol., no., pp.65-70, 3-5 Aug. 2006

    work page 2006

  27. [27]

    Notay, J.K.; Safdar, G.A., ”A Wireless Sensor Network based Structural Health Monitoring system for an airplane,” in Automation and Computing (ICAC) , 2011 17th International Conference on , vol., no., pp.240-245, 10-10 Sept. 2011

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    Wireless Sensor Networks for Oceanographic Monitoring: A Systematic Review

    Albaladejo, C.; S ˜A ↪anchez, P.; Iborra, A.; Soto, F.; L˜A¸ spez, J.A.; Torres, R. Wireless Sensor Networks for Oceanographic Monitoring: A Systematic Review. Sensors 2010, 10, 6948-6968

    work page 2010

  29. [29]

    Barrenetxea, F

    G. Barrenetxea, F. Ingelrest, G. Schaefer, and M. Vetterli. The hitchhiker’s guide to successful wireless sensor network deployments. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems, pages 43-56, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM

    work page 2008

  30. [30]

    T. W. Hnat, V. Srinivasan, J. Lu, T. Sookoor, R. Dawson, J. Stankovic, and K. Whitehouse. The hitchhiker’s guide to successful residential sensing deployments. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems , SenSys ’11, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    Langendoen, A

    K. Langendoen, A. Baggio, and O. Visser. Murphy loves potatoes: Experiences from a pilot sensor network deployment in precision agriculture. In Int. Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Real-Time Systems, 2006

    work page 2006

  32. [32]

    Tolle, J

    G. Tolle, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, D. Culler, N. Turner, K. Tu, S. Burgess, T. Dawson, P. Buonadonna, D. Gay, and W. Hong. A macroscope in the redwoods. ACM Sensys, 2005

    work page 2005

  33. [33]

    Werner-Allen, K

    G. Werner-Allen, K. Lorincz, J. Johnson, J. Lees, and M. Welsh. Fidelity and yield in a volcano monitoring sensor network. USENIX OSDI, 2006

    work page 2006

  34. [34]

    Mainetti, L.; Patrono, L.; Vilei, A., ”Evolution of wireless sensor networks towards the Internet of Things: A survey”, in Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM) , 2011 19th International Conference on , vol., no., pp.1-6, 15-17 Sept. 2011

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    http://www.cio.com/article/2981481/healthcare/how- the-internet-of-things-is-changing-healthcare-and- transportation.html

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    ”Monitoring large scale IEEE 802.15

    Tennina, Stefano, et al. ”Monitoring large scale IEEE 802.15. 4/ZigBee based Wireless Sensor Networks.” 7th European ZigBee Developers’ Conference. 2013

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    http://www.ti.com/lit/an/swra427c/swra427c.pdf

    work page

  38. [38]

    Danilo, et al

    Abrignani, M. Danilo, et al. ”The EuWIn Testbed for 802.15. 4/Zigbee Networks: From the Simulation to the Real World.” Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS 2013), Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on. VDE , 2013

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    ”A Holistic Framework for Realistic, Reproducible, Real-world Sensor Network Experimentation.”

    Gurov, Iliya. ”A Holistic Framework for Realistic, Reproducible, Real-world Sensor Network Experimentation.”

    work page

  40. [40]

    ”Energy harvesting for autonomous wireless sensor networks.” IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine 2.2 (2010): 29-38

    Vullers, Rudd, et al. ”Energy harvesting for autonomous wireless sensor networks.” IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine 2.2 (2010): 29-38

    work page 2010

  41. [41]

    Wint Yi Poe and Jens B. Schmitt. 2009. Node deployment in large wireless sensor networks: coverage, energy consumption, and worst-case delay. In Asian Internet Engineering Conference (AINTEC ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 77-84

    work page 2009

  42. [42]

    Wireless VITAE 2009

    Seah, W.K.G.; Zhi Ang Eu; Tan, H., ”Wireless sensor networks powered by ambient energy harvesting (WSN-HEAP) - Survey and challenges,” in Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems Technology, 2009. Wireless VITAE 2009. 1st International Conference on , vol., no., pp.1-5, 17-20 May 2009

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    Sudevalayam, S.; Kulkarni, P., ”Energy Harvesting Sensor Nodes: Survey and Implications,” in Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE , vol.13, no.3, pp.443-461, Third Quarter 2011

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    Srivastava

    Aman Kansal and Mani B. Srivastava. 2003. An environmental energy harvesting framework for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2003 international symposium on Low power electronics and design (ISLPED ’03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 481-486. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/871506.871624

    work page doi:10.1145/871506.871624 2003

  45. [45]

    Srivastava

    Aman Kansal, Jason Hsu, Sadaf Zahedi, and Mani B. Srivastava. 2007. Power management in energy harvesting sensor networks. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. 6, 4, Article 32 (September 2007). DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1274858.1274870

    work page doi:10.1145/1274858.1274870 2007

  46. [46]

    2007 doi: 10.1109/TMC.2007.30

    Niyato, D.; Hossain, E.; Fallahi, A., ”Sleep and Wakeup Strategies in Solar-Powered Wireless Sensor/Mesh Networks: Performance Analysis and Optimization,” in Mobile Computing, IEEE Transactions on , vol.6, no.2, pp.221-236, Feb. 2007 doi: 10.1109/TMC.2007.30

    work page doi:10.1109/tmc.2007.30 2007

  47. [47]

    Calhoun, B.H.; Daly, D.C.; Verma, N.; Finchelstein, D.F.; Wentzloff, D.D.; Wang, A.; Cho, S.; Chandrakasan, A.P., ”Design considerations for ultra-low energy wireless microsensor nodes,” in Computers, IEEE Transactions on , vol.54, no.6, pp.727-740, Jun 2005

    work page 2005

  48. [48]

    Stoica and R

    P. Stoica and R. Moses. Introduction to Spectral Analysis. Prentice Hall, 1997

    work page 1997

  49. [49]

    Bradford Campbell and Prabal Dutta. 2014. An energy-harvesting sensor architecture and toolkit for building monitoring and event detection. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Embedded Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings (BuildSys ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 100-109. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2674061.2674083

    work page doi:10.1145/2674061.2674083 2014

  50. [50]

    http://www.mouser.com/pdfdocs/mesh-rfm-sizing- wireless-sensor-networks.pdf

    work page

  51. [51]

    Duche, Ravindra N., and N. P. Sarwade. ”Sensor node failure or malfunctioning detection in wireless sensor network.” ACEEE Int. J. Commun 3.1 (2012): 57-61

    work page 2012

  52. [52]

    Bleakley, and Simon Dobson

    Kamal, Abu Raihan M., Chris J. Bleakley, and Simon Dobson. ”Failure detection in wireless sensor networks: A sequence-based dynamic approach.” ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) 10.2 (2014): 35

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    ”A survey of fault management in wireless sensor networks.” Journal of Network and Systems Management 15.2 (2007): 171-190

    Paradis, Lilia, and Qi Han. ”A survey of fault management in wireless sensor networks.” Journal of Network and Systems Management 15.2 (2007): 171-190

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    ”Toward intelligent sensors-reliability for time delay based direction of arrival estimates.” Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003

    Pirinen, Tuomo, Pasi Pertila, and Ari Visa. ”Toward intelligent sensors-reliability for time delay based direction of arrival estimates.” Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings.(ICASSP’03). 2003 IEEE International Conference on. Vol. 5. IEEE, 2003

    work page 2003

  55. [55]

    T. W. Pirinen, J.Yli-Hietanen, P. Pertil and A. Visa, ˆ a˘AIJDetection and compensation of Sensor malfunction in time delay based direction of arrival estim ation ˆ a˘AIJ IEE E Circu its an d Systems,vol.4,pp.872-875,May 2004

    work page 2004

  56. [56]

    ”Memento: A health monitoring system for wireless sensor networks.” Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2006

    Rost, Stanislav, and Hari Balakrishnan. ”Memento: A health monitoring system for wireless sensor networks.” Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2006. SECON’06. 2006 3rd Annual IEEE Communications Society on. Vol. 2. IEEE, 2006

    work page 2006

  57. [57]

    LIU, Y., LIU, K., AND LI, M. 2010. Passive diagnosis for wireless sensor networks. Networking, IEEE/ACM Transactions on 18, 4, 1132ˆ a˘A¸ S1144

    work page 2010

  58. [58]

    Maria Gorlatova, Peter Kinget, Ioannis Kymissis, Dan Rubenstein, Xiaodong Wang, and Gil Zussman. 2009. Challenge: ultra-low-power energy-harvesting active networked tags (EnHANTs). In Proceedings of the 15th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking (MobiCom ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 253-260. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1614...

    work page doi:10.1145/1614320.1614348 2009

  59. [59]

    ”A practical approach to deploy large scale wireless sensor networks.” Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems Conference, 2005

    Sheldon, Mike, et al. ”A practical approach to deploy large scale wireless sensor networks.” Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems Conference, 2005. IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2005

    work page 2005

  60. [60]

    Sarfraz Nawaz, Xiaomin Xu, David Rodenas-Herr’aiz, Paul Fidler, Kenichi Soga, and Cecilia Mascolo. 2015. Monitoring A Large Construction Site Using Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Workshop on Real World Wireless Sensor Networks (RealWSN ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 27-30. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2820990.2820997

    work page doi:10.1145/2820990.2820997 2015

  61. [61]

    http://www.daintree.net/

    work page

  62. [62]

    http://www.cypressenvirosystems.com/

    work page

  63. [63]

    http://www.millennialnet.com/

    work page

  64. [64]

    http://www.echelon.com/

    work page

  65. [65]

    http://www.utc.com/Pages/Home.aspx

    work page

  66. [66]

    http://www.daintree.net/wp- content/uploads/2016/02/Salk-Institute-Case- Study.5.pdf

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    http://www.daintree.net/wp- content/uploads/2014/02/wos2 wm installation guide.pdf

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    http://info.echelon.com/rs/echelon/images/Building- Automation-Lonworks-Backnet-Comparison- whitepaper.pdf

    work page

  69. [69]

    http://info.echelon.com/rs/echelon/images/M2M- IIoT-Behaviorally-Segmenting-the-IoT-by-Moor- Insights-Strategy-whitepaper.pdf

    work page

  70. [70]

    http://info.echelon.com/rs/echelon/images/M2M- Multi-Application-RF-Control-Networking- whitepaper.pdf)

    work page