Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 2 cited by

Direct detection of the cosmic expansion: the redshift drift and the flux drift

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-24 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Redshift drift and flux drift can directly detect cosmic expansion and acceleration with SKA1-mid by the mid-2030s if flux stability reaches 10^{-6}.

desk verdict This paper recycles the established redshift-drift idea, adds a flux-drift link, and claims SKA1-mid could detect both by the mid-2030s, but the detection timeline rests on unshown flux-stability and kinematic-separation performance. read the letter →

arxiv 1907.04495 v1 pith:P6AYJFJN submitted 2019-07-10 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Krzysztof Bolejko , Chengyi Wang , Geraint F. Lewis This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords redshiftdriftfluxcosmicexpansionSKAdirectdetectioncosmologyacceleratinguniverse
checked against Cost.FunctionalEquation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that the redshift drift, the slow change in observed redshift of distant sources over years, follows directly from the expansion of space and therefore tests cosmological models without intermediate distance indicators. It shows that the same expansion also produces a measurable flux drift in the received light, so the two effects can be combined to strengthen the signal. Strategies are outlined to separate this cosmological signal from the much larger but random motions of individual galaxies. The analysis concludes that if flux can be measured stably to one part in a million, the SKA1-mid Array can register both drifts before the ELT or the completed SKA, yielding direct evidence of expansion including its accelerating phase by the mid-2030s.

What carries the argument

The redshift drift (change in cosmological redshift with time) together with the linked flux drift, which together encode the time evolution of the scale factor.

What would settle it

A decade-long monitoring campaign with SKA1-mid that finds no net redshift or flux change at the level predicted by standard expanding models, after subtracting galaxy peculiar velocities, would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The redshift drift is a direct consequence of the expansion of the Universe. The redshift drift directly impacts the change of flux, so measurements of the flux drift provide an additional tool for detecting the expansion of the universe, including its acceleration. With flux stability at the level of ΔF/F ∼ 10^{-6}, the SKA1-mid Array should be able to detect these effects before the ELT and the full SKA, providing by mid-2030s a direct evidence of the expansion of the universe including its accelerating phase.

Load-bearing premise

Kinematic contamination from galaxy motions can be separated from the cosmological redshift and flux drift signals using the outlined strategies, and the required flux stability of 10^{-6} is achievable with SKA1-mid instrumentation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Direct measurement of expansion becomes possible without distance-ladder calibrations.
  • The accelerating phase can be confirmed by the sign of the measured drift.
  • SKA1-mid can reach the required sensitivity earlier than the ELT or full SKA.
  • Adding the flux-drift channel increases the overall detection significance.
  • Kinematic contamination can be mitigated by multi-epoch and multi-object strategies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same stability requirement would also allow cross-checks against independent expansion-rate probes such as baryon acoustic oscillations.
  • Extending the time baseline beyond a decade would tighten constraints on the deceleration parameter.
  • Other radio arrays reaching comparable flux stability could provide an independent confirmation route.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the cosmological redshift drift (spectral shift ~10^{-9} over a decade) and the associated flux drift provide a direct probe of cosmic expansion, including acceleration. It outlines strategies to mitigate kinematic contamination from galaxy motions and argues that flux stability of ΔF/F ∼ 10^{-6} would allow the SKA1-mid Array to detect these signals by the mid-2030s—earlier than the ELT or full SKA—by adding flux-drift measurements to the analysis pipeline.

Significance. If the stated instrumental stability and kinematic-separation performance can be demonstrated, the work would offer a novel radio-based route to direct detection of expansion that complements optical redshift-drift efforts. The suggestion to combine redshift and flux drifts is a potentially useful strengthening of the signal. The manuscript supplies only order-of-magnitude estimates and high-level strategies, however, so its immediate scientific impact is limited until quantitative support is added.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that SKA1-mid can detect the redshift and flux drifts with ΔF/F ∼ 10^{-6} before ELT/full SKA rests on an unverified threshold. No section, equation, or table supplies the required error budget, integration-time calculation, or Monte-Carlo simulation that propagates instrumental, calibration, and source-variability contributions to show that 10^{-6} stability is sufficient to reach the cosmological signal amplitude.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and discussion of kinematic strategies: the assertion that galaxy-motion contamination can be separated from the cosmological flux-drift signal (itself ~10^{-9} in relative terms) is presented without a quantitative residual-noise estimate. No calculation demonstrates that the outlined separation reduces the kinematic term below the target cosmological amplitude after realistic velocity dispersions and survey selection.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains the typo 'detectebility' (should be 'detectability') and 'ETL' (should be 'ELT').
  2. The manuscript would benefit from explicit references to prior redshift-drift literature and from a clear definition of the flux-drift quantity (e.g., whether it is derived directly from the redshift-drift formula or treated as an independent observable).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. The points raised correctly identify areas where the manuscript would benefit from additional quantitative analysis. We will revise the paper accordingly to include the requested error budgets and calculations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that SKA1-mid can detect the redshift and flux drifts with ΔF/F ∼ 10^{-6} before ELT/full SKA rests on an unverified threshold. No section, equation, or table supplies the required error budget, integration-time calculation, or Monte-Carlo simulation that propagates instrumental, calibration, and source-variability contributions to show that 10^{-6} stability is sufficient to reach the cosmological signal amplitude.

    Authors: We agree that a more detailed error budget is necessary to substantiate the central claim. In the revised manuscript, we will add integration-time calculations and Monte-Carlo simulations that incorporate instrumental noise, calibration uncertainties, and source variability. These additions will show that the 10^{-6} flux stability is sufficient for detection, supporting the statements in the abstract. We will also ensure the abstract accurately reflects the new quantitative results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and discussion of kinematic strategies: the assertion that galaxy-motion contamination can be separated from the cosmological flux-drift signal (itself ~10^{-9} in relative terms) is presented without a quantitative residual-noise estimate. No calculation demonstrates that the outlined separation reduces the kinematic term below the target cosmological amplitude after realistic velocity dispersions and survey selection.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the kinematic separation is discussed at a high level without quantitative residual estimates. We will include in the revision explicit calculations of the residual noise after applying the separation strategies, using realistic velocity dispersions and survey selections. This will demonstrate that the kinematic contamination can be reduced below the cosmological signal level of ~10^{-9}. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; claims are conditional proposals, not self-referential derivations.

full rationale

The paper's core content is a forward-looking proposal for observational detection of redshift and flux drift with instruments such as SKA1-mid, conditional on stated instrumental stability (ΔF/F ∼ 10^{-6}) and kinematic separation strategies. These are presented as external requirements rather than quantities derived from or fitted to the paper's own equations. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as prediction, or a self-citation chain; the relation between redshift drift and flux drift follows from standard cosmological kinematics without circular closure. The detectability timeline claims rest on unverified technical premises but do not exhibit the enumerated circularity patterns.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard cosmological model predicting the drift magnitudes and on assumptions about future instrument performance and contamination removal, none of which are independently verified in the abstract.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The universe expands according to the standard FLRW model, producing redshift drift of order 10^{-10} to 10^{-9} per decade
    Stated as direct consequence of expansion without derivation in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Kinematic contamination from peculiar velocities can be overcome with the proposed strategies
    Mentioned as focus but no details or validation provided.
  • domain assumption SKA1-mid can achieve flux stability of 10^{-6}
    Conditional claim for earlier detection.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Direct detection of the cosmic expansion: the redshift drift and the flux drift." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P6AYJFJN

@misc{pith2026190704495,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Direct detection of the cosmic expansion: the redshift drift and the flux drift},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P6AYJFJN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1907.04495}
}
abstract

The redshift drift, the change of cosmological redshift with time, is a direct consequence of the expansion of the Universe. Thus the measurement of the cosmological redshift drift will offer a direct test of our models of cosmology. The magnitude of the effect is very small, i.e. the spectral shift is of order of $10^{-10} - 10^{-9}$ over the period of a decade, but the next generation facilities such as ELT and SKA will be able to directly detect the expansion of our Universe by the year 2040. In this paper we focus on detectebility of this effect, including strategies of overcoming the kinematic contamination of the cosmological signal. We also show that the redshift drift directly impacts the change of flux. Thus apart from the redshift drift, measurements of the flux drift will provide an additional tool of detecting the expansion of the universe, including its acceleration. We discuss the strategies of detecting the flux drift and show that by including the flux drift signal to the redshift drift signal we boost the chances of a direct detection of the expansion of the Universe. We show that if only the stability of flux is at the level of $\Delta F/F \sim 10^{-6}$ then the SKA1-mid Array should be able to detect these effects, before the ETL and the full SKA. Thus, by including the flux drift into the SKA1-mid Array's analysis pipeline, we could be able to provide by mid-2030s a direct evidence of the expansion of the universe including its accelerating phase.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Estimating constraints on cosmological parameters via the canonical and the differential redshift drift with SKA HI 21-cm observations

    astro-ph.CO 2025-04 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A forecast that SKA 21-cm redshift drift observations could constrain CPL dark-energy parameters, but the claimed sub-cm/s constraints are not actual parameter errors because the paper reports signal derivatives inste...

  2. Redshift drift effect through the observation of HI 21cm signal with SKA

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A forecast study claims SKA with 0.001 Hz spectral resolution could measure cosmic redshift drift at millimeter-per-second precision over 0.5 years, yielding tight dark energy constraints.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Sandage, The Change of Redshift and Apparent Luminosity of Galaxies d ue to the Deceleration of Selected Expanding Universes

    A. Sandage, The Change of Redshift and Apparent Luminosity of Galaxies d ue to the Deceleration of Selected Expanding Universes. , Astroph. J. 136 (1962) 319

    work page 1962

  2. [2]

    Direct Measurement of Cosmological Parameters from the Cosmic Deceleration of Extragalactic Objects

    A. Loeb, Direct Measurement of Cosmological Parameters from the Cosm ic Deceleration of Extragalactic Objects, Astroph. J. 499 (1998) L111 [astro-ph/9802122]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    G. C. McVittie, Appendix to The Change of Redshift and Apparent Luminosity o f Galaxies due to the Deceleration of Selected Expanding Universes. , Astroph. J. 136 (1962) 334

    work page 1962

  4. [4]

    The time evolution of cosmological redshift as a test of dark energy

    A. Balbi and C. Quercellini, The time evolution of cosmological redshift as a test of dark energy, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 382 (2007) 1623 [0704.2350]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  5. [5]

    Lyman alpha absorbers in motion: consequences of gravitational lensing for the cosmological redshift drift experiment

    M. Killedar and G. F. Lewis, Lyα absorbers in motion: consequences of gravitational lensing for the cosmological redshift drift experiment , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 402 (2010) 650 [0910.4580]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    J.-P. Uzan, F. Bernardeau and Y. Mellier, Time drift of cosmological redshifts and its variance , Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 021301 [0711.1950]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  7. [7]

    Distinguishing Between Void Models and Dark Energy with Cosmic Parallax and Redshift Drift

    M. Quartin and L. Amendola, Distinguishing between void models and dark energy with cosm ic parallax and redshift drift , Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 043522 [0909.4954]. 1http://gnuplot.info/ 2https://matplotlib.org/ 3https://healpy.readthedocs.io 4https://samreay.github.io/ChainConsumer/ [24] – 12 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    Redshift propagation equations in the $\beta' \neq 0$ Szekeres models

    A. Krasiński and K. Bolejko, Redshift propagation equations in the β ′ ̸=0 Szekeres models , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 083503 [1007.2083]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

Show all 24 references
  1. [9]

    Korzyński and J

    M. Korzyński and J. Kopiński, Optical drift effects in general relativity , Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics 2018 (2018) 012 [1711.00584]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Grasso, M

    M. Grasso, M. Korzyński and J. Serbenta, Geometric optics in general relativity using bilocal operators, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 064038 [1811.10284]

    2019 arXiv

  3. [11]

    A. G. Kim, E. V. Linder, J. Edelstein and D. Erskine, Giving cosmic redshift drift a whirl , Astroparticle Physics 62 (2015) 195 [1402.6614]

    2015 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Haehnelt, S

    M. Haehnelt, S. Cristiani, V. D’Odorico, P. Molaro, M. V iel, E. Vanzella et al., CODEX Phase A Science Case . E-ELT PROGRAMME, E-TRE-IOA-573-0001, 2010

    2010

  5. [13]

    Challinor and F

    A. Challinor and F. van Leeuwen, Peculiar velocity effects in high-resolution microwave background experiments, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 103001 [astro-ph/0112457]

    2002 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Liske, A

    J. Liske, A. Grazian, E. Vanzella, M. Dessauges, M. Viel , L. Pasquini et al., E-ELT and the Cosmic Expansion History - A Far Stretch? , The Messenger 133 (2008) 10

    2008

  7. [15]

    P. E. Dewdney, W. Turner, R. Millenaar, R. McCool, J. Laz io and T. J. Cornwell, SKA1 System baseline design . SKA Office, 2013

    2013

  8. [16]

    Subrahmanyan, M

    R. Subrahmanyan, M. J. Kesteven, R. D. Ekers, M. Sinclai r and J. Silk, An Australia Telescope survey for CMB anisotropies , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 315 (2000) 808 [astro-ph/0002467]

    2000 arXiv

  9. [17]

    H. R. Kloeckner, D. Obreschkow, C. Martins, A. Raccanel li, D. Champion, A. L. Roy et al., Real time cosmology - A direct measure of the expansion rate o f the Universe with the SKA , in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AAS KA14), p. 27, Apr, 2015, 1501.03822

    2015 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Obreschkow, H

    D. Obreschkow, H. R. Klöckner, I. Heywood, F. Levrier an d S. Rawlings, A Virtual Sky with Extragalactic H I and CO Lines for the Square Kilometre Array a nd the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array , Astroph. J. 703 (2009) 1890 [0908.0983]

    2009 arXiv

  11. [19]

    G. F. R. Ellis, Republication of: Relativistic cosmology , General Relativity and Gravitation 41 (2009) 581

    2009

  12. [20]

    E. V. Linder, Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe , Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 091301 [astro-ph/0208512]

    2003 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Albrecht, G

    A. Albrecht, G. Bernstein, R. Cahn, W. L. Freedman, J. He witt, W. Hu et al., Report of the Dark Energy Task Force , arXiv e-prints (2006) astro [ astro-ph/0609591]

    2006 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnau d, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont et al., Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astroph. 594 (2016) A13 [1502.01589]

    2015 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Lazkoz, I

    R. Lazkoz, I. Leanizbarrutia and V. Salzano, Forecast and analysis of the cosmological redshift drift, European Physical Journal C 78 (2018) 11 [1712.07555]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    S. R. Hinton, ChainConsumer, The Journal of Open Source Software 1 (2016) 00045 . – 13 –

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed May 24, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.