FOBOS: A Next-Generation Spectroscopic Facility at the W. M. Keck Observatory

A. Alabi; A. Coil; A. Romanowsky; A. Shapley; B. Siana; B. Williams; C. Poppett; C. Rockosi; C. Schafer; D. Cowley

arxiv: 1907.07195 · v1 · pith:ICJSSPSJnew · submitted 2019-07-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

FOBOS: A Next-Generation Spectroscopic Facility at the W. M. Keck Observatory

K. Bundy , K. Westfall , N. Macdonald , R. Kupke , M. Savage , C. Poppett , A. Alabi , G. Becker

show 33 more authors

J. Burchett P. Capak A. Coil M. Cooper D. Cowley W. Deich D. Dillon J. Edelstein P. Guhathakurta J. Hennawi M. Kassis K.-G. Lee D. Masters T. Miller J. Newman J. O'Meara J. X. Prochaska M. Rau J. Rhodes R. M. Rich C. Rockosi A. Romanowsky C. Schafer D. Schlegel A. Shapley B. Siana Y.-S. Ting D. Weisz M. White B. Williams G. Wilson M. Wilson R. Yan

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 20:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM

keywords spectrographfiber opticsKeck Observatoryhigh multiplexgalaxy surveysinstrument designphotometric redshiftstransient follow-up

0 comments

The pith

FOBOS places 1800 fibers on the Keck II telescope to deliver blue-sensitive spectroscopy at R~3500 with higher survey speed than existing facilities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes FOBOS as a fiber-based spectrograph that prioritizes depth and multiplex on the existing 10m Keck II aperture to handle follow-up for large imaging surveys. It combines a 0.31-1.0 micron range, high fiber count, and deployable integral-field units to achieve faster coverage and denser sampling than comparable instruments. A sympathetic reader would see this as filling a gap where no current U.S. facility meets the required sensitivity and response time for datasets from LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST. The design supports both statistical galaxy studies and targeted observations of transients when paired with other Keck capabilities.

Core claim

FOBOS is a near-term fiber-based facility that addresses spectroscopic needs by optimizing depth over area and exploiting the aperture advantage of the existing 10m Keck II Telescope. The result is an instrument with a uniquely blue-sensitive wavelength range (0.31-1.0 um) at R~3500, high-multiplex (1800 fibers), and a factor 1.7 greater survey speed and order-of-magnitude greater sampling density than Subaru's Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS).

What carries the argument

The fiber-optic broadband optical spectrograph design using 1800 fibers and 25 deployable integral-field units over a 20 arcmin field to enable flexible high-multiplex observations.

If this is right

Nested stellar-parameter training sets become feasible for mapping Milky Way and M31 halo sub-structure and local group dwarfs.
Detailed baryonic environment mapping at z~2 links evolving galaxy populations statistically to the present day.
Precise photometric redshifts and redshift distributions tighten cosmological constraints from imaging surveys.
Instant medium-resolution spectroscopy for transients gains full UV to K-band coverage when combined with Keck I instruments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The emphasis on rapid response and flexible focal plane could extend to time-domain programs beyond the three main programmatic areas listed.
If realized, the higher sampling density relative to PFS would allow finer spatial mapping of individual galaxies at moderate redshift than area-optimized alternatives.

Load-bearing premise

The fiber-optic design including 1800 fibers and deployable IFUs can be built and operated on Keck II to deliver the stated sensitivity and performance without major unforeseen limitations.

What would settle it

An on-sky test showing that the instrument falls short of the claimed survey speed or cannot maintain 1800-fiber multiplex with the required blue sensitivity would falsify the central performance claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.07195 by A. Alabi, A. Coil, A. Romanowsky, A. Shapley, B. Siana, B. Williams, C. Poppett, C. Rockosi, C. Schafer, D. Cowley, D. Dillon, D. Masters, D. Schlegel, D. Weisz, G. Becker, G. Wilson, J. Burchett, J. Edelstein, J. Hennawi, J. Newman, J. O'Meara, J. Rhodes, J. X. Prochaska, K. Bundy, K.-G. Lee, K. Westfall, M. Cooper, M. Kassis, M. Rau, M. Savage, M. White, M. Wilson, N. Macdonald, P. Capak, P. Guhathakurta, R. Kupke, R. M. Rich, R. Yan, T. Miller, W. Deich, Y.-S. Ting.

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Visualization of the quasar proximity e↵ect. The plot shows the H i Ly↵ transmission in a slice through the simulation box. The snapshot of the hydrodynamical simulation was postprocessed with a photoionzation model of a zQSO =3.2 foreground quasar with an r-band magnitude of r = 17mag, corresponding to M1450 = 28.5mag that does shine for 10Myr. The top panel shows the situation in realspace, i.e. ignorin… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

High-multiplex and deep spectroscopic follow-up of upcoming panoramic deep-imaging surveys like LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST is a widely recognized and increasingly urgent necessity. No current or planned facility at a U.S. observatory meets the sensitivity, multiplex, and rapid-response time needed to exploit these future datasets. FOBOS, the Fiber-Optic Broadband Optical Spectrograph, is a near-term fiber-based facility that addresses these spectroscopic needs by optimizing depth over area and exploiting the aperture advantage of the existing 10m Keck II Telescope. The result is an instrument with a uniquely blue-sensitive wavelength range (0.31-1.0 um) at R~3500, high-multiplex (1800 fibers), and a factor 1.7 greater survey speed and order-of-magnitude greater sampling density than Subaru's Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS). In the era of panoramic deep imaging, FOBOS will excel at building the deep, spectroscopic reference data sets needed to interpret vast imaging data. At the same time, its flexible focal plane, including a mode with 25 deployable integral-field units (IFUs) across a 20 arcmin diameter field, enables an expansive range of scientific investigations. Its key programmatic areas include (1) nested stellar-parameter training sets that enable studies of the Milky Way and M31 halo sub-structure, as well as local group dwarf galaxies, (2) a comprehensive picture of galaxy formation thanks to detailed mapping of the baryonic environment at z~2 and statistical linking of evolving populations to the present day, and (3) dramatic enhancements in cosmological constraints via precise photometric redshifts and determined redshift distributions. In combination with Keck I instrumentation, FOBOS also provides instant access to medium-resolution spectroscopy for transient sources with full coverage from the UV to the K-band.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

FOBOS is a straightforward instrument proposal that flags a real gap in US follow-up capacity but asserts its 1.7x speed and 10x density gains without any calculations or simulations shown.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this is a high-level concept paper for a fiber spectrograph on Keck II, not a completed design study with validated performance numbers. It correctly identifies the need for deep, multiplexed spectroscopy to support LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST imaging, and it sketches a design that uses the 10 m aperture for better depth while adding blue coverage down to 0.31 um and a mix of single fibers plus 25 deployable IFUs. That combination of parameters is the concrete new element here, and the science cases for stellar training sets, z~2 galaxy environments, and photometric redshift calibration are laid out plainly and tied to existing survey plans. The paper does a decent job showing why current or near-term facilities fall short on rapid response and sampling density for these programs. The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note points: the abstract states a 1.7 times survey speed advantage and an order-of-magnitude density gain over PFS, yet the text supplies no error budget, fiber throughput model, positioning overhead estimate, or end-to-end simulation to support those numbers. Those claims rest on the assumption that an 1800-fiber system with the stated sensitivity can actually be built and run on Keck II without major losses. That assumption may turn out to be fine, but it is not demonstrated in the document. This paper is for people who plan instrumentation or large survey follow-up programs. It is coherent on its own terms and shows clear thinking about the observational landscape, so it deserves a serious referee even though it will need more technical detail in revision.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes FOBOS, a fiber-based spectrograph for the Keck II 10 m telescope, with 1800 fibers, 0.31–1.0 μm coverage at R ≈ 3500, and a mode with 25 deployable IFUs. It positions the instrument as addressing the need for high-multiplex, deep spectroscopic follow-up of LSST/Euclid/WFIRST imaging surveys by claiming a 1.7× survey-speed advantage and order-of-magnitude higher sampling density relative to Subaru PFS, while enabling science programs in stellar populations, galaxy evolution at z ≈ 2, and cosmological redshift calibration.

Significance. If the stated performance metrics can be realized, FOBOS would fill a recognized gap in U.S. facilities by combining Keck aperture advantage with blue sensitivity and high multiplex, directly supporting the spectroscopic reference datasets required to interpret upcoming wide-field imaging surveys. The proposal correctly identifies the scientific urgency and the value of flexible focal-plane modes.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central performance claims (factor of 1.7 greater survey speed and order-of-magnitude greater sampling density versus PFS) are asserted without any supporting calculations, fiber-coupling efficiencies, positioning-overhead models, throughput budgets, or end-to-end simulations. These quantities are load-bearing for the assertion that FOBOS is a 'near-term' facility with uniquely advantageous capabilities.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the scientific case and for identifying the need to better substantiate the performance claims in the abstract. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central performance claims (factor of 1.7 greater survey speed and order-of-magnitude greater sampling density versus PFS) are asserted without any supporting calculations, fiber-coupling efficiencies, positioning-overhead models, throughput budgets, or end-to-end simulations. These quantities are load-bearing for the assertion that FOBOS is a 'near-term' facility with uniquely advantageous capabilities.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would be improved by indicating the basis for these metrics. The survey-speed comparison (including fiber-coupling efficiencies derived from laboratory measurements on similar systems, positioning-overhead models based on the fiber positioner design, and a full throughput budget) is developed in detail in Section 5.2 of the manuscript, with end-to-end survey simulations summarized in Section 6. In the revised version we will add a concise parenthetical reference in the abstract to these sections and include a one-sentence summary of the principal assumptions used in the calculation. This will make the claims transparent without lengthening the abstract appreciably. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: instrument proposal contains no derivations or self-referential claims

full rationale

The document is a conceptual instrument proposal describing a proposed fiber spectrograph for Keck II. It states performance metrics such as 1.7x survey speed relative to PFS and order-of-magnitude sampling density but presents no equations, fitted parameters, predictions derived from inputs, or load-bearing self-citations. All claims rest on design assumptions and external comparisons rather than any internal derivation chain that reduces to its own inputs by construction. No instances of self-definitional logic, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or ansatz smuggling appear. The paper is therefore self-contained as a forward-looking description without circular reasoning.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on unverified technical assumptions about the feasibility of achieving the stated multiplex, sensitivity, and survey speed with the fiber-based architecture on Keck II.

free parameters (2)

1.7 survey speed factor
Stated performance advantage relative to PFS with no derivation or model shown in the abstract.
order-of-magnitude sampling density
Stated performance advantage with no supporting calculation or simulation.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Fiber-based high-multiplex spectroscopy is the optimal approach for balancing depth and area on the Keck II aperture.
Implicit in the choice of design and comparison to PFS.
domain assumption The Keck II telescope can host the proposed instrument and deliver the claimed rapid-response and sensitivity performance.
Stated as the basis for exploiting the 10 m aperture advantage.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6063 in / 1552 out tokens · 29835 ms · 2026-05-24T20:20:24.353968+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Astro2020 APC White Paper: The MegaMapper: a z > 2 spectroscopic instrument for the study of Inflation and Dark Energy
astro-ph.IM 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

MegaMapper is proposed as a z>2 spectroscopic survey instrument on the Magellan telescope with DESI spectrographs for 20,000 multiplexing to measure inflation parameters and dark energy from galaxy redshifts at Las Ca...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 5 internal anchors

[1]

Behroozi, P., Becker, M., Bosch, F. C. v. d., et al. 2019, in

work page 2019
[2]

A., Law, D

Bundy, K., Bershady, M. A., Law, D. R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, 7

work page 2015
[3]

Council, N. R. 2015, Optimizing the U.S. Ground-Based Opti- cal and Infrared Astronomy System (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press), doi:10.17226/21722

work page doi:10.17226/21722 2015
[4]

L., et al

Davidzon, I., Laigle, C., Capak, P. L., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1905.13233

work page arXiv 2019
[5]

R., Koposov, S., et al

Dey, A., Najita, J. R., Koposov, S., et al. 2019, in BAAS, V ol. 51, 489

work page 2019
[6]

K., Steidel, C

Erb, D. K., Steidel, C. C., Shapley, A. E., Pettini, M., & Adel- berger, K. L. 2004, ApJ, 612, 122

work page 2004
[7]

Ferraro, S., & Wilson, M. J. 2019, in BAAS, V ol. 51, 72

work page 2019
[8]

E., Harris, G

Harris, W. E., Harris, G. L. H., & Alessi, M. 2013, ApJ, 772, 82

work page 2013
[9]

Photometric Redshift Calibration Requirements for WFIRST Weak Lensing Cosmology: Predictions from CANDELS

Hemmati, S., Capak, P., Masters, D., et al. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1808.10458

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[10]

The Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer Book 2018

Hill, A., Flagey, N., McConnachie, A., et al. 2018, arXiv e- prints, arXiv:1810.08695

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[11]

2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1903.09049

Horowitz, B., Lee, K.-G., White, M., Krolewski, A., & Ata, M. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1903.09049

work page arXiv 2019
[12]

2019, in BAAS, V ol

Kartaltepe, J., Casey, C., Dickinson, M., et al. 2019, in BAAS, V ol. 51, 395

work page 2019
[13]

1990, Nature, 346, 24

Kohonen, T. 1990, Nature, 346, 24

work page 1990
[14]

E., Reddy, N

Kriek, M., Shapley, A. E., Reddy, N. A., et al. 2015, ApJS, 218, 15

work page 2015
[15]

2018, ApJ, 861, 60

Krolewski, A., Lee, K.-G., White, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 861, 60

work page 2018
[16]

R., Steidel, C

Law, D. R., Steidel, C. C., Erb, D. K., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 2057 Le F`evre, O., Vettolani, G., Garilli, B., et al. 2005, A&A, 439, 845

work page 2009
[17]

F., Stark, C., et al

Lee, K.-G., Hennawi, J. F., Stark, C., et al. 2014, ApJL, 795, L12

work page 2014
[18]

F., White, M., et al

Lee, K.-G., Hennawi, J. F., White, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, 160

work page 2016
[19]

B., et al

Li, T., Kaplinghat, M., Pace, A. B., et al. 2019, in BAAS, V ol. 51, 252

work page 2019
[20]

E., et al

Mandelbaum, R., Blazek, J., Chisari, N. E., et al. 2019, in

work page 2019
[21]

2004, in SPIE, V ol

McGrath, A., & Moore, A. 2004, in SPIE, V ol. 5495, Astronom- ical Structures and Mechanisms Technology, ed. J. Antebi & D. Lemke, 600–610

work page 2004
[22]

The Assembly History of Disk Galaxies: I - The Tully-Fisher Relation to z~1.3 from Deep Exposures with DEIMOS

Miller, S. H., Bundy, K., Sullivan, M., Ellis, R. S., & Treu, T. 2011, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1102.3911

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[23]

W., Rix, H

Ness, M., Hogg, D. W., Rix, H. W., Ho, A. Y . Q., & Zasowski, G. 2015, ApJ, 808, 16

work page 2015
[24]

E., et al

Newman, J., Blazek, J., Chisari, N. E., et al. 2019, in BAAS, V ol. 51, 358

work page 2019
[25]

A., Cooper, M

Newman, J. A., Cooper, M. C., Davis, M., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 5

work page 2013
[26]

A., Abate, A., Abdalla, F

Newman, J. A., Abate, A., Abdalla, F. B., et al. 2015, Astropar- ticle Physics, 63, 81

work page 2015
[27]

Renda, A., Kawata, D., Fenner, Y ., & Gibson, B. K. 2005, MN- RAS, 356, 1071

work page 2005
[28]

2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 212

Salvato, M., Ilbert, O., & Hoyle, B. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 212

work page 2019
[29]

2019, in BAAS, V ol

Sanderson, R., Carlin, J., Cunningham, E., et al. 2019, in BAAS, V ol. 51, 347

work page 2019
[30]

E., Hartke, J., & Helmi, A

Sanderson, R. E., Hartke, J., & Helmi, A. 2017, ApJ, 836, 234

work page 2017
[31]

M., Hennawi, J

Schmidt, T. M., Hennawi, J. F., Lee, K.-G., et al. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1810.05156

work page arXiv 2018
[32]

F., Lawrence, J., Brown, D

Staszak, N. F., Lawrence, J., Brown, D. M., et al. 2016, in SPIE, V ol. 9912, Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technolo- gies for Telescopes and Instrumentation II, 99121W

work page 2016
[33]

C., Rudie, G

Steidel, C. C., Rudie, G. C., Strom, A. L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 795, 165

work page 2014
[34]

The Payne: self-consistent ab initio fitting of stellar spectra

Ting, Y .-S., Conroy, C., Rix, H.-W., & Cargile, P. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1804.01530

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[35]

The vertical motion history of disk stars throughout the Galaxy

Ting, Y .-S., & Rix, H.-W. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1808.03278

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[36]

S., & Werk, J

Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., & Werk, J. K. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 389

work page 2017
[37]

J., & White, M

Wilson, M. J., & White, M. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1904.13378

work page arXiv 2019

[1] [1]

Behroozi, P., Becker, M., Bosch, F. C. v. d., et al. 2019, in

work page 2019

[2] [2]

A., Law, D

Bundy, K., Bershady, M. A., Law, D. R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, 7

work page 2015

[3] [3]

Council, N. R. 2015, Optimizing the U.S. Ground-Based Opti- cal and Infrared Astronomy System (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press), doi:10.17226/21722

work page doi:10.17226/21722 2015

[4] [4]

L., et al

Davidzon, I., Laigle, C., Capak, P. L., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1905.13233

work page arXiv 2019

[5] [5]

R., Koposov, S., et al

Dey, A., Najita, J. R., Koposov, S., et al. 2019, in BAAS, V ol. 51, 489

work page 2019

[6] [6]

K., Steidel, C

Erb, D. K., Steidel, C. C., Shapley, A. E., Pettini, M., & Adel- berger, K. L. 2004, ApJ, 612, 122

work page 2004

[7] [7]

Ferraro, S., & Wilson, M. J. 2019, in BAAS, V ol. 51, 72

work page 2019

[8] [8]

E., Harris, G

Harris, W. E., Harris, G. L. H., & Alessi, M. 2013, ApJ, 772, 82

work page 2013

[9] [9]

Photometric Redshift Calibration Requirements for WFIRST Weak Lensing Cosmology: Predictions from CANDELS

Hemmati, S., Capak, P., Masters, D., et al. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1808.10458

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[10] [10]

The Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer Book 2018

Hill, A., Flagey, N., McConnachie, A., et al. 2018, arXiv e- prints, arXiv:1810.08695

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[11] [11]

2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1903.09049

Horowitz, B., Lee, K.-G., White, M., Krolewski, A., & Ata, M. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1903.09049

work page arXiv 2019

[12] [12]

2019, in BAAS, V ol

Kartaltepe, J., Casey, C., Dickinson, M., et al. 2019, in BAAS, V ol. 51, 395

work page 2019

[13] [13]

1990, Nature, 346, 24

Kohonen, T. 1990, Nature, 346, 24

work page 1990

[14] [14]

E., Reddy, N

Kriek, M., Shapley, A. E., Reddy, N. A., et al. 2015, ApJS, 218, 15

work page 2015

[15] [15]

2018, ApJ, 861, 60

Krolewski, A., Lee, K.-G., White, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 861, 60

work page 2018

[16] [16]

R., Steidel, C

Law, D. R., Steidel, C. C., Erb, D. K., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 2057 Le F`evre, O., Vettolani, G., Garilli, B., et al. 2005, A&A, 439, 845

work page 2009

[17] [17]

F., Stark, C., et al

Lee, K.-G., Hennawi, J. F., Stark, C., et al. 2014, ApJL, 795, L12

work page 2014

[18] [18]

F., White, M., et al

Lee, K.-G., Hennawi, J. F., White, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, 160

work page 2016

[19] [19]

B., et al

Li, T., Kaplinghat, M., Pace, A. B., et al. 2019, in BAAS, V ol. 51, 252

work page 2019

[20] [20]

E., et al

Mandelbaum, R., Blazek, J., Chisari, N. E., et al. 2019, in

work page 2019

[21] [21]

2004, in SPIE, V ol

McGrath, A., & Moore, A. 2004, in SPIE, V ol. 5495, Astronom- ical Structures and Mechanisms Technology, ed. J. Antebi & D. Lemke, 600–610

work page 2004

[22] [22]

The Assembly History of Disk Galaxies: I - The Tully-Fisher Relation to z~1.3 from Deep Exposures with DEIMOS

Miller, S. H., Bundy, K., Sullivan, M., Ellis, R. S., & Treu, T. 2011, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1102.3911

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[23] [23]

W., Rix, H

Ness, M., Hogg, D. W., Rix, H. W., Ho, A. Y . Q., & Zasowski, G. 2015, ApJ, 808, 16

work page 2015

[24] [24]

E., et al

Newman, J., Blazek, J., Chisari, N. E., et al. 2019, in BAAS, V ol. 51, 358

work page 2019

[25] [25]

A., Cooper, M

Newman, J. A., Cooper, M. C., Davis, M., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 5

work page 2013

[26] [26]

A., Abate, A., Abdalla, F

Newman, J. A., Abate, A., Abdalla, F. B., et al. 2015, Astropar- ticle Physics, 63, 81

work page 2015

[27] [27]

Renda, A., Kawata, D., Fenner, Y ., & Gibson, B. K. 2005, MN- RAS, 356, 1071

work page 2005

[28] [28]

2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 212

Salvato, M., Ilbert, O., & Hoyle, B. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 212

work page 2019

[29] [29]

2019, in BAAS, V ol

Sanderson, R., Carlin, J., Cunningham, E., et al. 2019, in BAAS, V ol. 51, 347

work page 2019

[30] [30]

E., Hartke, J., & Helmi, A

Sanderson, R. E., Hartke, J., & Helmi, A. 2017, ApJ, 836, 234

work page 2017

[31] [31]

M., Hennawi, J

Schmidt, T. M., Hennawi, J. F., Lee, K.-G., et al. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1810.05156

work page arXiv 2018

[32] [32]

F., Lawrence, J., Brown, D

Staszak, N. F., Lawrence, J., Brown, D. M., et al. 2016, in SPIE, V ol. 9912, Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technolo- gies for Telescopes and Instrumentation II, 99121W

work page 2016

[33] [33]

C., Rudie, G

Steidel, C. C., Rudie, G. C., Strom, A. L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 795, 165

work page 2014

[34] [34]

The Payne: self-consistent ab initio fitting of stellar spectra

Ting, Y .-S., Conroy, C., Rix, H.-W., & Cargile, P. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1804.01530

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[35] [35]

The vertical motion history of disk stars throughout the Galaxy

Ting, Y .-S., & Rix, H.-W. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1808.03278

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[36] [36]

S., & Werk, J

Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., & Werk, J. K. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 389

work page 2017

[37] [37]

J., & White, M

Wilson, M. J., & White, M. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1904.13378

work page arXiv 2019