Can Sentiment Analysis Reveal Structure in a Plotless Novel?

Jon Chun; Katherine Elkins

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Can Sentiment Analysis Reveal Structure in a Plotless Novel?

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Sentiment analysis reveals that Woolf's seemingly plotless novel To the Lighthouse carries an emotional arc distributed across characters rather than a single hero.

desk verdict An honest exploratory DH paper with a suggestive reading of To the Lighthouse, but its central 'distributed heroine' claim rests on a smoothing window chosen after the fact. read the letter →

arxiv 1910.01441 v1 pith:CAPMMASS submitted 2019-08-31 cs.CL cs.SI

Katherine Elkins , Jon Chun This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CLcs.SI

keywords sentimentanalysisVirginiaWoolfTotheLighthousemodernistnovelemotionalarcdistributedheroineSyuzhet.Rclosereading

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that sentiment analysis can uncover emotional structure in a modernist novel that resists conventional plot analysis. Using Virginia Woolf's To the Lighthouse as the test case, the authors argue that the novel's emotional arc is not centered on one hero but is distributed across many characters, a pattern they call the distributed heroine model. They first defend the method by comparing the simple lexical tool Syuzhet.R with the more sophisticated VADER system, finding nearly identical sentiment distributions, and by showing that ten randomized reorderings of the novel produce noise from which the true sentiment plot stands apart. They then read the emotional highs and lows of a 10 percent rolling mean against the surrounding text and against recognized thematic patterns of connection and separation, arguing that the arc matches readerly experience. If this is right, sentiment analysis gives literary critics a new way to see structure in modernist fiction.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the smoothed emotional-valence curve produced by lexical sentiment analysis, specifically the Syuzhet.R package with its sliding rolling mean and DCT smoothing, cross-checked against VADER. A numeric sentiment score is computed for each sentence by summing the polarity values of words found in a sentiment lexicon, and a sliding window then averages these scores to expose an underlying arc buried in sentence-level noise; the paper settles on a 10 percent window, roughly 350 sentences, because it balances granularity against noise. The named identity that carries the interpretation is the distributed heroine model: the emotional peaks and valleys are not assigned to a single protagonist but emerge from multiple characters whose sentiments reinforce one another at moments of human connection and scatter at moments of separation. The 'middle reading' procedure, which compares each computational inflection point with its surrounding text and with known thematic patterns, is what turns the statistical curve into a literary claim.

What would settle it

Sweep the same pipeline over window sizes from 1 to 20 percent: if the distributed-heroine arc appears only at 10 percent and disappears at nearby windows, or if randomized shuffled versions of the novel sometimes produce arcs as structured as the original, the claim that the structure is inherent to To the Lighthouse is falsified. Alternatively, collect passage-level emotional ratings from human readers and test whether the 10 percent window's peaks and valleys predict those ratings better than the 5 percent window or random chance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central finding is that To the Lighthouse, far from being emotionally unstructured, reveals an underlying emotional structure distributed between characters, which the authors name the distributed heroine model. The emotional valence of the narrative, measured sentence by sentence and smoothed with a 10 percent rolling mean, rises at moments of connection and coherence among characters, such as the dinner party, Paul and Minta's shared 'we,' and Lily's completed painting, and falls at moments of separation, distance, and dissolution, such as the extinguished lamps, Mrs. Ramsay's death reported in brackets, and Cam's loss of the summer house. The authors argue that this arc is not a statistical artifact: ten randomized word salads of the novel produce a noisy band from which the original sentiment plot clearly stands apart, and the VADER comparison yields nearly identical distributions. They further claim that a 5 percent window would reduce the novel to a failed love-and-marriage plot centered on Lily and Mr. Bankes, while the 10 percent window captures the larger cast of characters and thereby matches a reader's experience of many perspectives reinforcing a shared emotional arc. As the novel progresses the arc becomes more coherent, mirroring at the level of emotion the movement from chaos to pattern that literary scholars such as Kern have traced in Woolf's themes.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the choice of a 10 percent rolling mean as the smoothing scale that reveals the arc: a 5 percent window produces a different, less coherent reading, and the paper justifies 10 percent mainly by the fact that it yields the distributed-heroine interpretation rather than by an independent measure of reader experience.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the claim is right, sentiment analysis can expose emotional structure in modernist novels that appear plotless by the usual action-event-causality standards.
The distributed heroine model implies that fragmented narrative perspective need not produce fragmented emotion; multiple characters can jointly carry a unified emotional arc.
The VADER comparison supports the practical conclusion that simple lexical sentiment tools are adequate for novel-length literary texts, making the method accessible to critics without deep NLP resources.
The window-size dependence shows that smoothing parameters change the interpretive outcome, so comparative model analysis must accompany any such claim.
The alignment of the arc with connection-versus-separation themes gives computational support to close-reading accounts of To the Lighthouse's pattern emerging from chaos.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the model generalizes, other multi-perspective modernist novels such as Mrs Dalloway or Ulysses should show similarly distributed emotional arcs rather than single-hero arcs; running the same pipeline on those texts would test that prediction.
The 10 percent window is validated in the paper mainly by the coherence of the reading it produces; an independent anchor, such as continuous reader-response ratings aligned with the arc, would be needed to separate the choice of scale from the interpretation.
A sharper test of the method would use the 10 percent arc to predict which passages readers rate as emotional peaks and valleys, rather than checking inflection points against close reading after the fact.
The striking difference between the 5 percent and 10 percent readings suggests that smoothing scale is itself an interpretive choice in computational literary studies, not merely a technical detail.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper is a sincere, exploratory digital-humanities study. Its contribution is not the tools—Syuzhet, VADER, DCT, rolling means are all prior art—but the text-specific claim that To the Lighthouse has an emotional arc distributed across characters, a 'distributed heroine.' The close reading of inflection points is genuine literary work: the authors actually check whether the computational peaks and valleys make sense in context, and they find thematic patterns (separation vs. coherence, distance vs. connection) that dovetail with existing Woolf scholarship. The VADER/Syuzhet comparison is a useful sanity check for simple lexical sentiment analysis on this text, and the word-salad control in Figure G is a legitimate test against randomness.

The soft spot is the one the stress-test flags, and the paper deserves to be taken down a notch for it. The choice of a 10% rolling window is not independently justified; it is retained because it yields the distributed-heroine reading, while the 5% window is rejected because it yields a less welcome 'failed love/marriage plot.' The authors even say they can 'only surmise' how to choose a filter. That is post hoc parameter selection. The word-salad control shows the signal is not noise, but it does not establish that 10% is the correct scale, nor does it distinguish the distributed-heroine interpretation from other possible arcs. The close-reading checks are performed by people who know the intended interpretation, with no independent annotation or pre-registered criterion.

That said, the paper is more honest than many: it explicitly raises the possibility that 'we might be able to justify any underlying pattern,' and it acknowledges that 'more exploration surrounding this question is needed.' The flaw is real but proportionate—this is an exploratory case study, not a definitive proof. The authors also overstate novelty with the claim they are 'the first' to hybridize computation and close reading; that is not credible, though the distributed-heroine framing is new.

Who is this for? Digital humanists working on sentiment analysis and narrative, and literary scholars curious about what computational methods can offer modernist studies. It deserves a serious referee, but the referee should ask for a more principled treatment of the smoothing window, ideally with a stability analysis across windows and, if possible, another novel. As it stands, the distributed-heroine is a suggestive hypothesis, not a well-supported discovery.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper applies lexical sentiment analysis (Syuzhet.R and VADER) to Virginia Woolf's To the Lighthouse, a modernist novel often described as plotless. It compares several smoothing techniques (LOESS, rolling mean, DCT) and reports broad agreement among them. The authors then perform a 'middle reading' that pairs rolling-mean inflection points with close reading, leading them to propose that the novel's emotional structure is distributed across characters, which they term a 'distributed heroine' model. They also benchmark Syuzhet against VADER, run a randomized word-salad control, and address earlier published critiques of Syuzhet in an appendix.

Significance. If the main claim were convincingly established, the paper would make a useful contribution to computational literary studies by showing that sentiment analysis can reveal an interpretable emotional structure in a novel that resists traditional event-based plot analysis, and by articulating a 'distributed heroine' concept that could inform modernist narrative theory. The paper has genuine strengths: it uses publicly available tools and texts, includes a randomized-control experiment (Figure G) that demonstrates the sentiment signal is not random, and transparently documents known limitations of the software. However, the central interpretive claim is currently supported chiefly by the authors' own close reading of a parameter choice that is itself justified by the interpretation it produces, so the significance of the finding is conditional on resolving that circularity.

major comments (3)

[Analyzing the Rolling Mean Using Close Reading (pp. 12–25)] The choice of the 10% rolling mean window is not justified by any independent theoretical, empirical, or reader-based criterion. The paper itself states that 'we can only surmise' how to choose a filter (p. 10), and when the 5% window is tested it is rejected because its inflection points suggest a 'failed love/marriage plot' rather than the distributed-heroine reading (p. 24). Because the 10% window is retained because it supports the distributed-heroine interpretation and the 5% window is dismissed because it does not, the central claim is vulnerable to post-hoc parameter selection. The authors need an outcome-independent justification for the window size, or a demonstration that neighboring windows (e.g., 7.5%, 12.5%) yield substantially the same distributed structure rather than only the single selected window.
[Validation throughout 'Analyzing the Rolling Mean Using Close Reading'] The 'readerly' validation of the emotional arc rests entirely on the authors' own close reading of the selected inflection points P1–P22. There is no independent human annotation, no pre-registered definition of 'coherence,' and no quantitative measure of agreement between the computational arc and reader judgments. The same interpretive judgment that selects the 10% window is also used to confirm that the resulting arc is meaningful, which is circular. The word-salad control (Figure G) shows that the smoothed sentiment signal is distinguishable from random word order, but it does not show that the specific 10% window captures readerly experience or that the 'distributed heroine' interpretation is the correct one among the many arcs extractable at different scales.
[Comparing Models section (pp. 7–11) and Appendix A] The Syuzhet/VADER comparison is reported only qualitatively. The paper claims 'very similar distributions with very similar means, variances and slight negative skews' and, in Appendix A, 'almost identical frequency distribution,' but no numerical values, plots, or statistical tests are provided. Since the purpose of this comparison is to establish that Syuzhet's simple lexical approach is not statistically distorted by negation and intensifier errors, the reader cannot assess whether the claimed similarity is meaningful. Reporting summary statistics (means, variances, skewness) or a distance test (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov) would make the methodological defense concrete.

minor comments (5)

[General] The abstract's claim to be 'the first to undertake a hybrid model that fully leverages the strengths of both computational analysis and close reading' is unsupported by the cited literature and overlooks prior work that combines distant and close reading, including the paper's own footnote 4 reference to Laurie Taylor. Recommend softening the novelty claim.
[p. 4] In 'of it’s naive lexical approach,' 'it’s' should be 'its'. Also, on p. 3, 'more thorough statistical modelling' should likely be 'more thorough statistical modeling' (spelling aside, the phrase is awkward).
[p. 25] The abbreviation 'LPS' is introduced as 'low pass filter (LPS)' but the standard term is LPF, and the abbreviation is used inconsistently (LPF appears elsewhere). Please standardize.
[p. 12] The description of rolling-mean clipping is confusing: 'the first sentiment value is calculated at the 5% point as the mean value for the midpoint of the 10% sliding window.' A small diagram or a clearer formula would help readers understand the edge handling.
[Appendix A] The upper-bound sentence-splitting error analysis is a nice robustness check, but the sample sizes (56 sentences for Woolf, 72 for Dickens) are small; reporting a confidence interval or exact binomial bounds would strengthen the claim that the error rate is negligible.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Distributed-heroine finding is an artifact of the 10% smoothing window, which is chosen because it produces that finding; the 5% window is rejected post hoc.

fitted input called prediction [Section 'Analyzing the Rolling Mean Using Close Reading', pages 22-25 (5% vs 10% window test)]
"Briefly, the cruxes that surfaced with a 5% Rolling Mean were far more difficult to harmonize with human interpretation. As just one example, one of the higher emotional valences occurs when Mr. Bankes exhibits negative existential musings at the dinner party—the exact opposite of what we would expect. ... This finer granularity turns the narrative into a failed love/marriage plot whose main characters are Mr. Bankes and Lily. ... With the 10% window, by contrast, the emotional arc of the novel is distributed across various characters—a technique we call the “distributed hero(ine).”"

The 10% window is not selected by an independent, outcome-free criterion; the paper earlier concedes, 'we can only surmise' about how to choose a filter. The 5% window is rejected because it generates a 'failed love/marriage plot' centered on Lily and Mr. Bankes, while the 10% window is retained because it generates the 'distributed hero(ine)' reading. The same close-reading judgment is used both to reject the 5% result and to validate the 10% result, so the central finding is an artifact of the chosen smoothing parameter rather than an independent discovery. The randomized word-salad control (Fig. G) and the VADER comparison only establish that some sentiment signal exists; they do not fix the window scale or discriminate between the distributed-heroine and love/marriage interpretations.

full rationale

The core analysis is transparent and mostly non-circular: the VADER/Syuzhet distribution comparison provides an external check on the lexical method, the randomized word-salad control (Fig. G) demonstrates that the sentiment signal is non-random, and the agreement among DCT, LOESS, and Rolling Mean shows that broad peaks and valleys are not artifacts of one smoother. However, the paper's central claim—that To the Lighthouse has an emotional structure 'distributed between characters' rather than organized around a conventional hero—is established by choosing the 10% rolling-mean window after inspecting the 5% window. The authors explicitly say that the 5% window 'turns the narrative into a failed love/marriage plot' and that 'With the 10% window, by contrast, the emotional arc of the novel is distributed across various characters—a technique we call the distributed hero(ine).' Because the window-size parameter is selected on the basis of which reading it supports, the distributed-heroine conclusion is built into the parameter choice. The word-salad control does not fix the smoothing scale, and the close-reading 'comport' check is carried out by the same interpreters who made the reject/retain decision. This is partial circularity, not total: the existence of some coherent sentiment arc has independent support, but the specific distributed-heroine form does not.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on assumptions about sentiment lexicons, on the authors' close reading as the gold standard, on the validity of random word salads as a null model, and on the choice of smoothing parameters. The paper provides qualitative support but not quantitative validation for these assumptions.

free parameters (2)

Rolling mean window size = 10% of the novel's sentences (approximately 350 sentences)
The authors chose 10% over smaller windows because it produced a plot that could be harmonized with close reading; the 5% window was rejected as incoherent. No independent criterion for choosing the window is given.
DCT low-pass filter value = 5 (Jockers default) and 10
The authors use both DCT low-pass filter values to compare simplified and more detailed arcs; the choice of which filter to interpret is not justified by a formal criterion.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Lexical sentiment scores from Syuzhet and VADER measure emotional valence in To the Lighthouse sufficiently for structural claims.
The paper defends this by qualitative comparison to VADER and to readerly judgment, but does not provide quantitative human annotation for the novel.
domain assumption Agreement with the authors' close reading is an acceptable gold standard for the emotional arc.
The paper repeatedly uses 'comports with readerly analysis' as validation, but the same critic selects the inflection points.
domain assumption Randomized word salads are a valid null model preserving lexical content while destroying syntax.
Inspired by Reagan et al.; original plot standing out from ten shuffled versions is taken as evidence of structure, but the difference is not statistically quantified.
ad hoc to paper The 10% rolling mean window approximates readerly experience more closely than smaller windows.
This assumption is introduced after observing that the 10% window yields the distributed-heroine reading; the 5% window is judged inferior because it does not.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Can Sentiment Analysis Reveal Structure in a Plotless Novel?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CAPMMASS

@misc{pith2026191001441,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Can Sentiment Analysis Reveal Structure in a Plotless Novel?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CAPMMASS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1910.01441}
}

read the original abstract

Modernist novels are thought to break with traditional plot structure. In this paper, we test this theory by applying Sentiment Analysis to one of the most famous modernist novels, To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf. We first assess Sentiment Analysis in light of the critique that it cannot adequately account for literary language: we use a unique statistical comparison to demonstrate that even simple lexical approaches to Sentiment Analysis are surprisingly effective. We then use the Syuzhet.R package to explore similarities and differences across modeling methods. This comparative approach, when paired with literary close reading, can offer interpretive clues. To our knowledge, we are the first to undertake a hybrid model that fully leverages the strengths of both computational analysis and close reading. This hybrid model raises new questions for the literary critic, such as how to interpret relative versus absolute emotional valence and how to take into account subjective identification. Our finding is that while To the Lighthouse does not replicate a plot centered around a traditional hero, it does reveal an underlying emotional structure distributed between characters - what we term a distributed heroine model. This finding is innovative in the field of modernist and narrative studies and demonstrates that a hybrid method can yield significant discoveries.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

The AI Fiction Paradox
cs.AI 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

AI's inability to generate compelling long-form fiction stems from narrative causation, informational revaluation, and multi-scale emotional architecture—three constraints current transformer architectures lack.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

12 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

not happy

atterns in narrative that are shared across stories. Recent state-of-the-art sentiment detection relies upon combinations of newer techniques like word embeddings, neural networks and built-in heuristics (Zhang et al.). In this paper we chose to test the simpler lexical approach because it is more widely available to a broad range of scholars. Lexical app...

work page 2015
[4]

I am guarding you--I am your support,

"of the children playing cricket, had ceased; so that the monotonous fall of the waves on the beach, which for the most part beat a measured and soothing tattoo to her thoughts and seemed consolingly to repeat over and over again as she sat with the children the words of some old cradle song, murmured by nature, "I am guarding you--I am your support," but...

work page 2015
[6]

The Emotional Arcs of Stories Are Dominated by Six Basic Shapes

Reagan, Andrew J., Mitchell, Lewis, Kiley, Dilan, Danforth, Christopher M., and Dodds, Peter 31 Sheridan. “The Emotional Arcs of Stories Are Dominated by Six Basic Shapes.” EPJ Data Science 5, no. 31 ( 2016). Reiter, N., Frank, A., and Hellwig, O, “An NLP-based cross-document approach to narrative structure discovery,” Literary and Linguistic Computing, v...

work page 2016
[10]

To The Lighthouse

This results in a graph with more undulations. It may represent high-order information in more complex waveforms but distracts, perhaps, from seeing the fundamental rhythms driving sentiment. Jockers advocates the DCT method with a default low pass value of 5 in order to reveal the basic underlying shape. Figure E, labeled Simplified Macro Shape, shows th...

work page 2012
[11]

Mrs. Rachael, I needn't inform you who were acquainted with the late Miss Barbary's affairs, that her means die with her and that this young lady, now her aunt is dead--

We were unable to reproduce the exact error. Instead only two of the three sentences merged. Furthermore, the sentence splitting seemed grammatically correct due to Dickens frequent stylistic use of double dashes “--” to continue thoughts across independent sentences instead of formally ending them with punctuation marks. Here is our result from trying to...

work page 2018
[317]

Time Passes

Sentiment analysis reveals this concern with chaos and pattern to be a continuing preoccupation of Woolf’s. Indeed, the emotional arc of the novel mirrors this same gradual coherence of shape out of chaos as the arc moves from less coherent emotional valence to more. While giving us a slightly more detailed picture of how this thematic pattern weaves thro...

work page arXiv 1982
[1989]

Deep Learning for Sentiment Analysis: A Survey

-----. To The Lighthouse. http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks01/0100101h.html Zhang, Lei, Wang, Shuai and Liu, Bing. “Deep Learning for Sentiment Analysis: A Survey.” https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.07883v2 Jan

arXiv
[2002]

The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis

Stone, Philip J., Dexter C. Dunphy, and Marshall S. Smith. "The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis." MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1966). Syuzhet.R. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/syuzhet/index.html VADER, Hutton, C.J., Gilbert, Eric, Georgia Institute of Technology. https://github.com/cjhutto/vaderSentiment. Woolf, Virginia. “...

work page 1966

Show all 12 references

[2014]

Plot Arceology: A Vector Space Model of Narrative Structure

Schmidt, Benjamin. “Plot Arceology: A Vector Space Model of Narrative Structure.” http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/BigData.2015.7363937. Sheehan, Paul. Modernism, Narrative, and Humanism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP,

2015
[2015]

Audio-Visual Sentiment Analysis for Learning Emotional Arcs in Movies

Chu, Eric and Roy, Deb. “Audio-Visual Sentiment Analysis for Learning Emotional Arcs in Movies.” arXiv:1712.02896v1, 8 Dec

arXiv
[2017]

A Survey on Sentiment Analysis Challenges,

Kim, Evgeny, and Klinger, Roman. A Survey on Sentiment and Emotion Analysis for Computational Literary Studies. https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.03137 Aug 2018 Mohey El-Din Mohamed Hussein, D. “A Survey on Sentiment Analysis Challenges,” Journal of King Saud University, https://bit....

2018 arXiv
[2018]

not good

32 Appendix A Addressing Critiques of Syuzhet.R This paper uses the Syuzhet.R software package by Matthew Jockers7 to perform standard lexical Sentiment Analysis. We chose this package for a number of reasons enumerated in the body of our paper, but also because it has been su...

2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

not happy

atterns in narrative that are shared across stories. Recent state-of-the-art sentiment detection relies upon combinations of newer techniques like word embeddings, neural networks and built-in heuristics (Zhang et al.). In this paper we chose to test the simpler lexical approach because it is more widely available to a broad range of scholars. Lexical app...

work page 2015

[2] [4]

I am guarding you--I am your support,

"of the children playing cricket, had ceased; so that the monotonous fall of the waves on the beach, which for the most part beat a measured and soothing tattoo to her thoughts and seemed consolingly to repeat over and over again as she sat with the children the words of some old cradle song, murmured by nature, "I am guarding you--I am your support," but...

work page 2015

[3] [6]

The Emotional Arcs of Stories Are Dominated by Six Basic Shapes

Reagan, Andrew J., Mitchell, Lewis, Kiley, Dilan, Danforth, Christopher M., and Dodds, Peter 31 Sheridan. “The Emotional Arcs of Stories Are Dominated by Six Basic Shapes.” EPJ Data Science 5, no. 31 ( 2016). Reiter, N., Frank, A., and Hellwig, O, “An NLP-based cross-document approach to narrative structure discovery,” Literary and Linguistic Computing, v...

work page 2016

[4] [10]

To The Lighthouse

This results in a graph with more undulations. It may represent high-order information in more complex waveforms but distracts, perhaps, from seeing the fundamental rhythms driving sentiment. Jockers advocates the DCT method with a default low pass value of 5 in order to reveal the basic underlying shape. Figure E, labeled Simplified Macro Shape, shows th...

work page 2012

[5] [11]

Mrs. Rachael, I needn't inform you who were acquainted with the late Miss Barbary's affairs, that her means die with her and that this young lady, now her aunt is dead--

We were unable to reproduce the exact error. Instead only two of the three sentences merged. Furthermore, the sentence splitting seemed grammatically correct due to Dickens frequent stylistic use of double dashes “--” to continue thoughts across independent sentences instead of formally ending them with punctuation marks. Here is our result from trying to...

work page 2018

[6] [317]

Time Passes

Sentiment analysis reveals this concern with chaos and pattern to be a continuing preoccupation of Woolf’s. Indeed, the emotional arc of the novel mirrors this same gradual coherence of shape out of chaos as the arc moves from less coherent emotional valence to more. While giving us a slightly more detailed picture of how this thematic pattern weaves thro...

work page arXiv 1982

[7] [1989]

Deep Learning for Sentiment Analysis: A Survey

-----. To The Lighthouse. http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks01/0100101h.html Zhang, Lei, Wang, Shuai and Liu, Bing. “Deep Learning for Sentiment Analysis: A Survey.” https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.07883v2 Jan

arXiv

[8] [2002]

The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis

Stone, Philip J., Dexter C. Dunphy, and Marshall S. Smith. "The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis." MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1966). Syuzhet.R. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/syuzhet/index.html VADER, Hutton, C.J., Gilbert, Eric, Georgia Institute of Technology. https://github.com/cjhutto/vaderSentiment. Woolf, Virginia. “...

work page 1966