Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Pomset logic: the other approach to non commutativity in logic

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.02155 v2 pith:HZH6CVLR submitted 2020-01-07 cs.LO math.LO

Pomset logic: the other approach to non commutativity in logic

classification cs.LO math.LO
keywords logicpomsetcalculuslinearproofnon-commutativeperptriangleleft
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Thirty years ago, I introduced a non-commutative variant of classical linear logic, called "pomset logic", issued from a particular categorical interpretation of linear logic known as coherence spaces. In addition to the usual commutative multiplicative connectives of linear logic, pomset logic includes a non-commutative connective, "$\triangleleft$" called "before", associative and self-dual: $(A\triangleleft B)^\perp=A^\perp \triangleleft B^\perp$. The conclusion of a pomset logic proof is a Partially Ordered MultiSET of formulas. Pomset logic enjoys a proof net calculus with cut-elimination, denotational semantics, and faithfully embeds sequent calculus. The study of pomset logic has reopened with recent results on handsome proof nets, on its sequent calculus, or on its following calculi like deep inference by Guglielmi and Strassburger. Therefore, it is high time we published a thorough presentation of pomset logic, including published and unpublished material, old and new results. Pomset logic (1993) is a non-commutative variant of linear logic (1987) as for Lambek calculus (1958!) and it can also be used as a grammatical formalism. Those two calculi are quite different, but we hope that the algebraic presentation we give here, with formulas as algebraic terms and with a semantic notion of proof (net) correctness, better matches Lambek's view of what a logic should be.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Causality in Pure Quantum Computation with Quantum Control

    cs.PL 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A typed lambda calculus based on intuitionistic BV logic blocks higher-order quantum-control programs that violate causality, and its categorical model excludes the OCB process.