REVIEW 2 cited by
Open Access uptake by universities worldwide
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Open Access uptake by universities worldwide
read the original abstract
The implementation of policies promoting the adoption of an Open Science culture must be accompanied by indicators that allow monitoring the penetration of such policies and their potential effects on research publishing and sharing practices. This study presents indicators of Open Access (OA) penetration at the institutional level for universities worldwide. By combining data from Web of Science, Unpaywall and the Leiden Ranking disambiguation of institutions, we track OA coverage of universities' output for 963 institutions. This paper presents the methodological challenges, conceptual discrepancies and limitations and discusses further steps needed to move forward the discussion on fostering Open Access and Open Science practices and policies.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Theoretical Properties of Multivariate Random Forest in Feature Selection and its Application to Facial Morphology-Gene Detection
Multivariate random forest permutation importance is given a conditional sure-screening guarantee and applied to facial-shape GWAS after LASSO pre-screening.
-
You Only Train Once: Differentiable Subset Selection for Omics Data
YOTO jointly learns a discrete gene subset and a multi-task predictor in one differentiable model, outperforming baselines only at moderate-to-large panel sizes.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.