Euclid preparation: X. The Euclid photometric-redshift challenge

A. Alvarez-Ayllon; A. Balaguera-Antol\'inez; A. Biviano; A. Cappi; A. Cimatti; A. Da Silva; A. Ealet; A. Galametz; A. Humphrey; A. N. Taylor

Euclid preparation: X. The Euclid photometric-redshift challenge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.12112 v2 pith:SKWJI2PS submitted 2020-09-25 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

Euclid preparation: X. The Euclid photometric-redshift challenge

Euclid Collaboration: G. Desprez , S. Paltani , J. Coupon , I. Almosallam , A. Alvarez-Ayllon , V. Amaro , M. Brescia , M. Brodwin

show 164 more authors

S. Cavuoti J. De Vicente-Albendea S. Fotopoulou P. W. Hatfield W. G. Hartley O. Ilbert M. J. Jarvis G. Longo R. Saha J. S. Speagle A. Tramacere M. Castellano F. Dubath A. Galametz M. Kuemmel C. Laigle E. Merlin J. J. Mohr S. Pilo M. Salvato M. M. Rau S. Andreon N. Auricchio C. Baccigalupi A. Balaguera-Antol\'inez M. Baldi S. Bardelli R. Bender A. Biviano C. Bodendorf D. Bonino E. Bozzo E. Branchini J. Brinchmann C. Burigana R. Cabanac S. Camera V. Capobianco A. Cappi C. Carbone J. Carretero C. S. Carvalho R. Casas S. Casas F. J. Castander G. Castignani A. Cimatti R. Cledassou C. Colodro-Conde G. Congedo C. J. Conselice L. Conversi Y. Copin L. Corcione H. M. Courtois J.-G. Cuby A. Da Silva S. de la Torre H. Degaudenzi D. Di Ferdinando M. Douspis C. A. J. Duncan X. Dupac A. Ealet G. Fabbian M. Fabricius S. Farrens P. G. Ferreira F. Finelli P. Fosalba N. Fourmanoit M. Frailis E. Franceschi M. Fumana S. Galeotta B. Garilli W. Gillard B. Gillis C. Giocoli G. Gozaliasl J. Graci\'a-Carpio F. Grupp L. Guzzo M. Hailey S. V. H. Haugan W. Holmes F. Hormuth A. Humphrey K. Jahnke E. Keihanen S. Kermiche M. Kilbinger C. C. Kirkpatrick T. D. Kitching R. Kohley B. Kubik M. Kunz H. Kurki-Suonio S. Ligori P. B. Lilje I. Lloro D. Maino E. Maiorano O. Marggraf K. Markovic N. Martinet F. Marulli R. Massey M. Maturi N. Mauri S. Maurogordato E. Medinaceli S. Mei M. Meneghetti R. Benton Metcalf G. Meylan M. Moresco L. Moscardini E. Munari S. Niemi C. Padilla F. Pasian L. Patrizii V. Pettorino S. Pires G. Polenta M. Poncet L. Popa D. Potter L. Pozzetti F. Raison A. Renzi J. Rhodes G. Riccio E. Rossetti R. Saglia D. Sapone P. Schneider V. Scottez A. Secroun S. Serrano C. Sirignano G. Sirri L. Stanco D. Stern F. Sureau P. Tallada Cresp\'i D. Tavagnacco A. N. Taylor M. Tenti I. Tereno R. Toledo-Moreo F. Torradeflot L. Valenziano J. Valiviita T. Vassallo M. Viel Y. Wang N. Welikala L. Whittaker A. Zacchei G. Zamorani J. Zoubian E. Zucca

This is my paper

classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

keywords redshiftphotometriceuclidmethodschallengedataparticipantsphotometry

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

0 comments

read the original abstract

Forthcoming large photometric surveys for cosmology require precise and accurate photometric redshift (photo-z) measurements for the success of their main science objectives. However, to date, no method has been able to produce photo-$z$s at the required accuracy using only the broad-band photometry that those surveys will provide. An assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of current methods is a crucial step in the eventual development of an approach to meet this challenge. We report on the performance of 13 photometric redshift code single value redshift estimates and redshift probability distributions (PDZs) on a common set of data, focusing particularly on the 0.2--2.6 redshift range that the Euclid mission will probe. We design a challenge using emulated Euclid data drawn from three photometric surveys of the COSMOS field. The data are divided into two samples: one calibration sample for which photometry and redshifts are provided to the participants; and the validation sample, containing only the photometry, to ensure a blinded test of the methods. Participants were invited to provide a redshift single value estimate and a PDZ for each source in the validation sample, along with a rejection flag that indicates sources they consider unfit for use in cosmological analyses. The performance of each method is assessed through a set of informative metrics, using cross-matched spectroscopic and highly-accurate photometric redshifts as the ground truth. We show that the rejection criteria set by participants are efficient in removing strong outliers, sources for which the photo-z deviates by more than 0.15(1+z) from the spectroscopic-redshift (spec-z). We also show that, while all methods are able to provide reliable single value estimates, several machine-learning methods do not manage to produce useful PDZs. [abridged]

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Optimizing the extraction of information from redshift probability distribution functions
astro-ph.IM 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

turboPDZ extracts optimized photo-z point estimates and reliability scores from PDZs that outperform HSC catalog z_best and risk/confidence flags across six pipeline-layer combinations.