REVIEW 1 cited by
Neutrino 2020: Theory Outlook
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
I present a personal vision of what is essential in the field of neutrino mass, both from the point of view of what has been achieved and what could lie ahead. In the process, I offer a logical, theoretical and phenomenological rationale behind my opinions. It is however neither a summary of what was discussed in the conference nor a party-line viewpoint, rather an attempt to dig through the enormous body of material in our field in order to uncover a common unifying thread. The main focus is on the search for a predictive and self-contained theory of the origin and nature of neutrino mass, with the conclusion that the Left-Right Symmetric Model plays a special role in this aspect.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Particle physics: a personal view
A senior physicist's essay argues the Standard Model's only genuine flaw is neutrino mass, calls naturalness worries aesthetic, and makes the case that the left-right symmetric theory is the best-motivated BSM candidate.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.