Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Self-Supervision Closes the Gap Between Weak and Strong Supervision in Histology

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.03583 v1 pith:5U5RHM2I submitted 2020-12-07 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords learningextractorfeaturehistologyannotationscamelyon16imagenetimages
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

One of the biggest challenges for applying machine learning to histopathology is weak supervision: whole-slide images have billions of pixels yet often only one global label. The state of the art therefore relies on strongly-supervised model training using additional local annotations from domain experts. However, in the absence of detailed annotations, most weakly-supervised approaches depend on a frozen feature extractor pre-trained on ImageNet. We identify this as a key weakness and propose to train an in-domain feature extractor on histology images using MoCo v2, a recent self-supervised learning algorithm. Experimental results on Camelyon16 and TCGA show that the proposed extractor greatly outperforms its ImageNet counterpart. In particular, our results improve the weakly-supervised state of the art on Camelyon16 from 91.4% to 98.7% AUC, thereby closing the gap with strongly-supervised models that reach 99.3% AUC. Through these experiments, we demonstrate that feature extractors trained via self-supervised learning can act as drop-in replacements to significantly improve existing machine learning techniques in histology. Lastly, we show that the learned embedding space exhibits biologically meaningful separation of tissue structures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Current Pathology Foundation Models are unrobust to Medical Center Differences

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ten pathology foundation models encode medical center identity more strongly than cancer type in their embeddings, according to a new Robustness Index.

  2. On the Generalizability of Iterative Patch Selection for Memory-Efficient High-Resolution Image Classification

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The generalization threshold for Iterative Patch Selection on low object-to-image-ratio images depends on training set size and task, and smaller patches relative to the object improve low-data accuracy.

  3. Understanding Synergistic Interactions among Pathology Foundation Models via Adaptive Fusion

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A lightweight gating network that fuses frozen pathology foundation models improves several downstream benchmarks, but one headline metric is contradicted by the paper's own table.

  4. Robustifying pathology foundation models via fine-tuning

    cs.CV 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A uniform fine-tuning step improves acquisition robustness and downstream performance across ten pathology foundation models, but the paper never discloses the fine-tuning recipe.

  5. SimMIL: A Universal Weakly Supervised Pre-Training Framework for Multi-Instance Learning in Whole Slide Pathology Images

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A weakly supervised pre-training scheme that propagates bag labels to patches improves downstream MIL classification and survival prediction on WSI datasets, but the comparison baselines are not trained on the same ta...

Pith tools