Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Results of the 2020 fastMRI Challenge for Machine Learning MR Image Reconstruction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.06318 v3 pith:MVN34CTZ submitted 2020-12-09 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords challengedataparticipantsscansbraincommunityevaluationsfastmri
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Accelerating MRI scans is one of the principal outstanding problems in the MRI research community. Towards this goal, we hosted the second fastMRI competition targeted towards reconstructing MR images with subsampled k-space data. We provided participants with data from 7,299 clinical brain scans (de-identified via a HIPAA-compliant procedure by NYU Langone Health), holding back the fully-sampled data from 894 of these scans for challenge evaluation purposes. In contrast to the 2019 challenge, we focused our radiologist evaluations on pathological assessment in brain images. We also debuted a new Transfer track that required participants to submit models evaluated on MRI scanners from outside the training set. We received 19 submissions from eight different groups. Results showed one team scoring best in both SSIM scores and qualitative radiologist evaluations. We also performed analysis on alternative metrics to mitigate the effects of background noise and collected feedback from the participants to inform future challenges. Lastly, we identify common failure modes across the submissions, highlighting areas of need for future research in the MRI reconstruction community.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Average Kernel Sizes -- Computable Sharp Accuracy Bounds for Inverse Problems

    math.OC 2025-10 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper defines an "average kernel size" from feasible sets and claims it bounds the reconstruction error of any inverse-problem solver; the main lower bound is false when feasible sets have unequal sizes.

Pith tools