Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Corner Cases for Visual Perception in Automated Driving: Some Guidance on Detection Approaches

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.05897 v1 pith:6LCK4T44 submitted 2021-02-11 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords cornercasesdetectiondrivingdataperceptionthemvisual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automated driving has become a major topic of interest not only in the active research community but also in mainstream media reports. Visual perception of such intelligent vehicles has experienced large progress in the last decade thanks to advances in deep learning techniques but some challenges still remain. One such challenge is the detection of corner cases. They are unexpected and unknown situations that occur while driving. Conventional visual perception methods are often not able to detect them because corner cases have not been witnessed during training. Hence, their detection is highly safety-critical, and detection methods can be applied to vast amounts of collected data to select suitable training data. A reliable detection of corner cases will not only further automate the data selection procedure and increase safety in autonomous driving but can thereby also affect the public acceptance of the new technology in a positive manner. In this work, we continue a previous systematization of corner cases on different levels by an extended set of examples for each level. Moreover, we group detection approaches into different categories and link them with the corner case levels. Hence, we give directions to showcase specific corner cases and basic guidelines on how to technically detect them.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. NSF-HRPT: Neural Semantic Field meets Hierarchical Risk Perception Tree for Safety-Critical Scenario Assessment

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A simulator-trained neural semantic field plus a hierarchical risk tree estimates per-agent collision risk and time-to-collision from monocular video, with foundation-model features used to close the sim-to-real gap w...

  2. Stereo-based 3D Anomaly Object Detection for Autonomous Driving: A New Dataset and Baseline

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    S3AD decouples 2D and 3D supervision and adds a disparity-only foreground head with RbAF scoring, detecting out-of-distribution 3D objects from stereo images, validated on the new KITTI-AR dataset.

  3. SafeDriveRAG: Towards Safe Autonomous Driving with Knowledge Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SafeDrive228K is a 228K-example multimodal QA benchmark for traffic safety, and a graph-based RAG method improves VLM accuracy on it by 4.7 to 14.6 points across five models.

  4. ECCV 2024 W-CODA: 1st Workshop on Multimodal Perception and Comprehension of Corner Cases in Autonomous Driving

    cs.CV 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A workshop report documenting the ECCV 2024 W-CODA event, its accepted papers, speakers, and the dual-track corner case understanding and generation challenge.

Pith tools