Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

MERMAID: Metaphor Generation with Symbolism and Discriminative Decoding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.06779 v2 pith:IVLISOJ2 submitted 2021-03-11 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords metaphorsliteralmodelconceptscorpusdecodingevaluationgenerate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generating metaphors is a challenging task as it requires a proper understanding of abstract concepts, making connections between unrelated concepts, and deviating from the literal meaning. In this paper, we aim to generate a metaphoric sentence given a literal expression by replacing relevant verbs. Based on a theoretically-grounded connection between metaphors and symbols, we propose a method to automatically construct a parallel corpus by transforming a large number of metaphorical sentences from the Gutenberg Poetry corpus (Jacobs, 2018) to their literal counterpart using recent advances in masked language modeling coupled with commonsense inference. For the generation task, we incorporate a metaphor discriminator to guide the decoding of a sequence to sequence model fine-tuned on our parallel data to generate high-quality metaphors. Human evaluation on an independent test set of literal statements shows that our best model generates metaphors better than three well-crafted baselines 66% of the time on average. A task-based evaluation shows that human-written poems enhanced with metaphors proposed by our model are preferred 68% of the time compared to poems without metaphors.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Characterizing Human-Likeness in AI Generated Poetry: A Zero-shot Classification Study

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Zero-shot Gemma 4 classification separates AI from human poems at 90% weighted F1, while human evaluators reach only 45% accuracy, and the study catalogs the linguistic attributes behind correct and incorrect detections.

  2. When Meaning Travels: A Granular Lens on Hybrid-MoE's Role in Idiomatic Understanding for Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    HybridMoE with controlled hybridization and idiomatic property signals yields 5-6% gains in figurative language representation for multilingual vision-language models.

Pith tools