pith. sign in

arxiv: 2103.09981 · v1 · submitted 2021-03-18 · ⚛️ physics.optics · quant-ph

Simple and efficient way to generate superbunching pseudothermal light

Jianbin Liu , Rui Zhuang , Xuexing Zhang , Chaoqi Wei , Huaibin Zheng , Yu Zhou , Hui Chen , Yuchen He
show 1 more author
Zhuo Xu
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 13:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics quant-ph
keywords superbunchingpseudothermal lightsecond-order coherencethird-order coherenceintensity modulationghost imagingrotating groundglassbinary distribution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Modulating laser intensity before a rotating groundglass produces pseudothermal light with second-order coherence of 20.45.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

By applying binary intensity modulation to laser light before it reaches a rotating groundglass, the scattered light becomes a superbunching pseudothermal source whose second-order coherence exceeds the usual value of 2. Experiments achieve a second-order coherence of 20.45 and a third-order coherence of 227.07. Numerical simulations show that further gains in second-order coherence are possible by adjusting the parameters of the binary distribution. The source is presented as a direct replacement for ordinary thermal or pseudothermal light in studies of higher-order interference and in temporal ghost imaging.

Core claim

The paper establishes that binary intensity modulation applied to the input laser before scattering from the rotating groundglass raises the degree of second-order coherence of the output light to 20.45 and the degree of third-order coherence to 227.07, values far above the 2 and 6 obtained from unmodified pseudothermal light, while numerical work shows that tuning the binary distribution parameters can increase the second-order value still further and that temporal ghost imaging quality improves with the new source.

What carries the argument

Binary intensity modulation of the laser beam prior to scattering from the rotating groundglass.

If this is right

  • Tuning the parameters of the binary intensity distribution can increase the second-order coherence beyond the observed 20.45.
  • Temporal ghost imaging performed with the modulated source yields higher quality reconstructions than with ordinary pseudothermal light.
  • The same modulated source can replace thermal or pseudothermal light in any setup that relies on second- or higher-order interference measurements.
  • Third-order coherence values reach 227.07, opening direct access to three-photon correlation experiments that were previously limited by the value of 6.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may generalize to other groundglass or diffuser geometries provided the input intensity statistics remain binary.
  • Because the modulation occurs before scattering, the method could be combined with different wavelengths or pulse durations without redesigning the diffuser itself.
  • The large observed gap between g(2) = 20.45 and the thermal limit of 2 suggests that similar pre-modulation could be tested on non-Gaussian scatterers to reach still higher coherence orders.

Load-bearing premise

The binary intensity modulation applied before the rotating groundglass directly produces the reported increase in coherence of the scattered light without introducing uncontrolled noise or altering the scattering statistics in unintended ways.

What would settle it

A side-by-side measurement of the intensity correlation functions for identical groundglass rotation speeds, first without any pre-modulation (yielding g(2) exactly equal to 2) and then with the binary pre-modulation (yielding g(2) of 20 or higher), while the single-beam intensity statistics remain unchanged.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2103.09981 by Chaoqi Wei, Huaibin Zheng, Hui Chen, Jianbin Liu, Rui Zhuang, Xuexing Zhang, Yuchen He, Yu Zhou, Zhuo Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Experimental setup to observe two-photon superbunching effect. Laser: single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Relation between the applied voltage from SG and output voltage of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Measured second-order temporal coherence functions of superbunching [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Measured three-photon coincidence counts of superbunching pseudothermal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The degree of second-order coherence of light following binary distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulated temporal ghost imaging with random intensities following binary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

By modulating the intensity of laser light before the rotating groundglass, the well-known pseudothermal light source can be modified into superbunching pseudothermal light source, in which the degree of second-order coherence of the scattered light is larger than 2. With the modulated intensities following binary distribution, we experimentally observed the degree of second- and third-order coherence equaling 20.45 and 227.07, which is much larger than the value of thermal or pseudothermal light, 2 and 6, respectively. Numerical simulation predicts that the degree of second-order coherence can be further improved by tuning the parameters of binary distribution. It is also predicted that the quality of temporal ghost imaging can be improved with this superbunching pseudothermal light. This simple and efficient superbunching pseudothermal light source provides an interesting alternative to study the second- and higher-order interference of light in these scenarios where thermal or pseudothermal light source were employed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes a modification to the standard pseudothermal light source in which the input laser intensity is modulated according to a binary distribution before scattering from a rotating ground glass. This is claimed to produce 'superbunching' light whose measured second- and third-order coherence degrees reach 20.45 and 227.07, respectively—far above the thermal values of 2 and 6. Numerical simulations are said to show that further increases are possible by tuning the binary-distribution parameters, and an improvement in temporal ghost imaging is predicted.

Significance. If the experimental claims are substantiated with adequate controls and statistics, the work would supply a simple, low-cost route to pseudothermal sources with unusually high higher-order coherence. Such sources could be useful for laboratory studies of multi-photon interference and for testing whether elevated g^(n) improves the signal-to-noise ratio of ghost-imaging protocols. The approach requires only an intensity modulator in addition to the usual rotating-ground-glass setup, which is a practical advantage.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Results] Abstract and results section: the central experimental claim reports g^(2)=20.45 and g^(3)=227.07 without any measurement protocol, integration time, number of samples, error bars, or detector-linearity checks. These omissions make it impossible to judge whether the quoted numbers reflect the intended binary-exponential convolution or arise from saturation, timing jitter, or other instrumental effects.
  2. [Experimental setup / Results] Experimental-setup description: the paper states that binary intensity modulation is applied before the ground glass but supplies neither the concrete parameters of the binary distribution (e.g., the two intensity levels and their probabilities) nor any measured intensity histogram of the modulated beam or of the scattered light. Without this verification, it cannot be confirmed that the observed coherence values originate from the intended product statistics rather than from modulation-induced temporal correlations or changes in speckle contrast.
  3. [Numerical simulation] Numerical-simulation paragraph: the claim that g^(2) 'can be further improved by tuning the parameters of binary distribution' is presented without the specific parameter values, the functional form of the modulation, or a comparison between simulated and measured intensity probability densities. Consequently the simulation cannot be reproduced or used to assess the robustness of the experimental result.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Theory] The manuscript refers to 'the degree of second- and third-order coherence' without explicitly stating whether the reported numbers are g^(2)(0) and g^(3)(0) or integrated quantities; consistent notation should be used throughout.
  2. [Figures / Results] Figure captions and text should indicate the number of independent realizations or the total acquisition time used to compute the coherence functions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We agree that several key experimental and simulation details were omitted from the original manuscript, which limits the ability to fully assess the results. We will revise the manuscript to address each point raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Results] Abstract and results section: the central experimental claim reports g^(2)=20.45 and g^(3)=227.07 without any measurement protocol, integration time, number of samples, error bars, or detector-linearity checks. These omissions make it impossible to judge whether the quoted numbers reflect the intended binary-exponential convolution or arise from saturation, timing jitter, or other instrumental effects.

    Authors: We agree that these details are essential. In the revised manuscript we will add a full description of the measurement protocol, including integration time per data point, total number of samples, error bars on the reported g^(2) and g^(3) values, and explicit checks confirming detector linearity within the operating range. The quoted values were obtained under conditions where saturation and timing jitter were avoided, but we will document these controls explicitly so readers can evaluate the data independently. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental setup / Results] Experimental-setup description: the paper states that binary intensity modulation is applied before the ground glass but supplies neither the concrete parameters of the binary distribution (e.g., the two intensity levels and their probabilities) nor any measured intensity histogram of the modulated beam or of the scattered light. Without this verification, it cannot be confirmed that the observed coherence values originate from the intended product statistics rather than from modulation-induced temporal correlations or changes in speckle contrast.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the specific binary-distribution parameters and intensity histograms were not provided. We will revise the experimental section to state the exact intensity levels and probabilities used, and we will include the measured intensity histograms of both the modulated input beam and the scattered light. These additions will confirm that the observed coherence degrees arise from the intended product of binary and thermal statistics rather than from unintended temporal correlations or altered speckle contrast. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Numerical simulation] Numerical-simulation paragraph: the claim that g^(2) 'can be further improved by tuning the parameters of binary distribution' is presented without the specific parameter values, the functional form of the modulation, or a comparison between simulated and measured intensity probability densities. Consequently the simulation cannot be reproduced or used to assess the robustness of the experimental result.

    Authors: We acknowledge the omission of simulation details. The revised manuscript will specify the exact parameter values employed, describe the functional form of the binary modulation, and add a direct comparison between the simulated and experimentally measured intensity probability density functions. This will enable reproduction of the simulations and allow quantitative assessment of how well the experimental results match the predicted statistics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central claims are direct experimental measurements

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental modification of a pseudothermal source via binary intensity modulation before the rotating groundglass, with reported g^(2) and g^(3) values obtained as direct measurements from the scattered light. No analytic derivation chain, fitted-parameter predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps are present in the provided text; the numerical simulations are described only as forward predictions of further improvement and do not retroactively define the measured results. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks with no reduction of outputs to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the domain assumption that binary intensity modulation before the groundglass alters the intensity statistics of the scattered field in the manner required to produce the stated coherence values; no free parameters are explicitly fitted in the abstract, and no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • binary distribution parameters
    Parameters of the binary intensity distribution are tuned to achieve the observed coherence; exact values not stated in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Intensity modulation before the rotating groundglass modifies the coherence properties of the scattered light to produce superbunching
    This premise is required for the modification of the standard pseudothermal source to work as claimed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5709 in / 1228 out tokens · 32576 ms · 2026-05-24T13:46:52.885855+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Photon statistics of superbunching pseudothermal light

    quant-ph 2021-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Experimental measurement finds that superbunching pseudothermal light photon distributions deviate from thermal light more strongly in the tail as the degree of second-order coherence increases.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Coherence and fluctuations in light beams,

    W. Martienssen and E. Spiller, “Coherence and fluctuations in light beams,” Am. J. Phys.32, 919-926 (1964)

    work page 1964

  2. [2]

    Ghost imaging with thermal light: Comparing entanglement and classical correlation,

    A. Gatti, E. Brambilla, M. Bache, and L. A. Lugiato, “Ghost imaging with thermal light: Comparing entanglement and classical correlation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.93(9), 093602 (2004)

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    Two-photon imaging with thermal light,

    A. Valencia, G. Scarcelli, M. D’Angelo, and Y. H. Shih, “Two-photon imaging with thermal light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(6), 063601 (2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    High-orderthermalghostimaging,

    K.W.C.Chan,M.N.O’Sullivan,andR.W.Boyd,“High-orderthermalghostimaging,”Opt.Lett. 34(21),3343-3345 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    High-resolution far-field ghost imaging via sparsity constraint,

    W. L. Gong and S. S. Han, “High-resolution far-field ghost imaging via sparsity constraint,” Sci. Rep.5, 9280 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Experimental observation of classical subwavelength interference with a pseudothermal light source,

    J. Xiong, D. Z. Cao, F. Huang, H. G. Li, X. J. Sun, and K. G. Wang, “Experimental observation of classical subwavelength interference with a pseudothermal light source,” Phys. Rev. Lett.94(17), 173601 (2005)

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    Two-photon interference with two independent pseudothermal sources,

    Y. H. Zhai, X. H. Chen, and L. A. Wu, “Two-photon interference with two independent pseudothermal sources,” Phys. Rev. A74(5), 053807 (2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Bromberg, Y

    Y. Bromberg, Y. Lahini, E. Small, and Y. Silberberg, “Hanbury Brown and Twiss interferometry with interacting photons,“ Nature Photon.4, 721-726 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Turbulence-Free Double-slit Interferometer,

    T. A. Smith and Y. H. Shih, “Turbulence-Free Double-slit Interferometer,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120(6), 063606 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Delayed-choice quantum eraser with thermal light,

    T. Peng, H. Chen, Y. H. Shih, and M. O. Scully, “Delayed-choice quantum eraser with thermal light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112(18), 180401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    An optical multimode fiber as pseudothermal light source,

    T. Mehringer, S. Oppel, and J. von Zanthier, “An optical multimode fiber as pseudothermal light source,” Appl. Phys. B 123, 200 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Hanbury Brown,The Intensity Interferometer: its Application to Astronomy (Taylor and Francis Ltd., Loundon, 1974)

    R. Hanbury Brown,The Intensity Interferometer: its Application to Astronomy (Taylor and Francis Ltd., Loundon, 1974)

    work page 1974

  13. [13]

    Superbunching pseudothermal light,

    Y. Zhou, F. L. Li, B. Bai, H. Chen, J. B. Liu, Z. Xu, and H. B. Zheng, “Superbunching pseudothermal light,” Phys. Rev. A95(5), 053809 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Photon superbunching of classical light in the Hanbury Brown–Twiss interferometer,

    B. Bai, J. B. Liu, Y. Zhou, H. B. Zheng, H. Chen, S. L. Zhang, Y. C. He, F. L. Li, and Z. Xu, “Photon superbunching of classical light in the Hanbury Brown–Twiss interferometer,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B34(10), 2081-2088 (2017)

    work page 2081

  15. [15]

    Ghost imaging in the time domain,

    P. Ryczkowski, M. Barbier, Ari T. Friberg, J.M. Dudley, and G. Genty, “Ghost imaging in the time domain,” Nature Photon. 10,167-170 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    High visibility temporal ghost imaging with classical light,

    J. B. Liu, J. J. Wang, H. Chen, H. B. Zheng, Y. Y. Liu, Y. Zhou, F. L. Li, and Z. Xu, “High visibility temporal ghost imaging with classical light,” Opt. Commun.410, 824-829 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Superbunching pseudothermal light with intensity modulated laser light and rotating groundglass,

    Y. Zhou, X. X. Zhang, Z. P. Wang, F. Y. Zhang, H. Chen, H. B. Zheng, J. B. Liu, F. L. Li, and Z. Xu, “Superbunching pseudothermal light with intensity modulated laser light and rotating groundglass,” Opt. Commun.437, 330-336 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Generator of arbitrary classical photon statistics,

    I. Straka, J. Mika, and M. Jězek, “Generator of arbitrary classical photon statistics,” Opt. Express26(7), 8998-9010 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    The quantum theory of optical coherence,

    R. J. Glauber, “The quantum theory of optical coherence,” Phys. Rev.130(6), 2529-2539 (1963)

    work page 1963

  20. [20]

    Coherent and incoherent states of radiation field,

    R. J. Glauber, “Coherent and incoherent states of radiation field,” Phys. Rev.131(6), 2766-2788 (1963)

    work page 1963

  21. [21]

    Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams,

    E. C. G. Sudarshan, “Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett.10(7), 277-279 (1963)

    work page 1963

  22. [22]

    R. P. Feynman and A. R. HibbsQuantum Mechanics and Path Integrals (McGraw-Hill, Inc., NY, 1965)

    work page 1965

  23. [23]

    Unified interpretation for second-order subwavelength interference based on Feynman’s path-integral theory,

    J. B. Liu and G. Q. Zhang, “Unified interpretation for second-order subwavelength interference based on Feynman’s path-integral theory,” Phys. Rev. A82(1), 013822 (2010)

    work page 2010

  24. [24]

    Second-order temporal interference of two independent light beams at an asymmetrical beam splitter,

    J. B. Liu, J. J. Wang, and Z. Xu, “Second-order temporal interference of two independent light beams at an asymmetrical beam splitter,” Chin. Phys. B26(1), 014201 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Corrrelationbetweenphotonsintwocoherentbeamsoflight,

    R.HanburyBrownandR.Q.Twiss,“Corrrelationbetweenphotonsintwocoherentbeamsoflight,”Nature 177(4497), 27-29 (1956)

    work page 1956

  26. [26]

    Atestofanewtypeofstellarinterferometeronsirius,

    R.H.BrownandR.Q.Twiss, “Atestofanewtypeofstellarinterferometeronsirius,” Nature 178, 1046-1048(1956)

    work page 1956

  27. [27]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Westview Press, Colorado, 1995)

    work page 1995

  28. [28]

    Born and E

    M. Born and E. Wolf,Principles of Optics, 7th ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    work page 1999

  29. [29]

    Y. H. Shih.An Introduction to Quantum Optics (Taylor and Francis Group, LLC, FL, 2011)

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    Experimental observation of three-photon superbunching with classical light in a linear system,

    Y. Zhou, S. Luo, Z. H. Tang, H. B. Zheng, H. Chen, J. B. Liu, F. L. Li, and Z. Xu, “Experimental observation of three-photon superbunching with classical light in a linear system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B36(1), 96-100 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Ficek and S

    Z. Ficek and S. Swain,Quantum Interference and Coherence: Theory and Experiments (Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., 2005)

    work page 2005

  32. [32]

    Loudon,The Quantum Theory of Light (3rd ed.) (Oxford University Press, New York, 2000)

    R. Loudon,The Quantum Theory of Light (3rd ed.) (Oxford University Press, New York, 2000)

    work page 2000

  33. [33]

    Time-correspondence differential ghost imaging,

    M. F. Li, Y. R. Zhang, K. H. Luo, L. A. Wu, and H. Fan, “Time-correspondence differential ghost imaging,” Phys. Rev. A87(3), 033813 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    K. R. Castleman,Digital Image Processing (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996)

    work page 1996