REVIEW 1 cited by
Combining independent p-values in replicability analysis: A comparative study
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Combining independent p-values in replicability analysis: A comparative study
read the original abstract
Given a family of null hypotheses $H_{1},\ldots,H_{s}$, we are interested in the hypothesis $H_{s}^{\gamma}$ that at most $\gamma-1$ of these null hypotheses are false. Assuming that the corresponding $p$-values are independent, we are investigating combined $p$-values that are valid for testing $H_{s}^{\gamma}$. In various settings in which $H_{s}^{\gamma}$ is false, we determine which combined $p$-value works well in which setting. Via simulations, we find that the Stouffer method works well if the null $p$-values are uniformly distributed and the signal strength is low, and the Fisher method works better if the null $p$-values are conservative, i.e. stochastically larger than the uniform distribution. The minimum method works well if the evidence for the rejection of $H_{s}^{\gamma}$ is focused on only a few non-null $p$-values, especially if the null $p$-values are conservative. Methods that incorporate the combination of $e$-values work well if the null hypotheses $H_{1},\ldots,H_{s}$ are simple.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Risk-Limiting Audits for Parliamentary Majorities
A parliamentary majority can be certified with far fewer inspected ballots than certifying every reported seat, using a product of seat-level anytime-valid e-processes and adaptive sampling.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.