REVIEW 2 cited by
Computationally Efficient Optimization of Plackett-Luce Ranking Models for Relevance and Fairness
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Computationally Efficient Optimization of Plackett-Luce Ranking Models for Relevance and Fairness
read the original abstract
Recent work has proposed stochastic Plackett-Luce (PL) ranking models as a robust choice for optimizing relevance and fairness metrics. Unlike their deterministic counterparts that require heuristic optimization algorithms, PL models are fully differentiable. Theoretically, they can be used to optimize ranking metrics via stochastic gradient descent. However, in practice, the computation of the gradient is infeasible because it requires one to iterate over all possible permutations of items. Consequently, actual applications rely on approximating the gradient via sampling techniques. In this paper, we introduce a novel algorithm: PL-Rank, that estimates the gradient of a PL ranking model w.r.t. both relevance and fairness metrics. Unlike existing approaches that are based on policy gradients, PL-Rank makes use of the specific structure of PL models and ranking metrics. Our experimental analysis shows that PL-Rank has a greater sample-efficiency and is computationally less costly than existing policy gradients, resulting in faster convergence at higher performance. PL-Rank further enables the industry to apply PL models for more relevant and fairer real-world ranking systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Rank-Conditioned Sample Reuse for the Plackett--Luce Best-of-$K$ Objective
Rank-conditioned Horvitz–Thompson reuses all C(n,K) subsets of one Gumbel-Top-n pool for unbiased Plackett–Luce best-of-K value and score-function gradient, with an exact Max-specific DP collapse to a 1-D integral.
-
Scoring Is Not Enough: Addressing Gaps in Utility-fairness Trade-offs for Ranking
Scoring functions are sub-optimal for all utility-fairness trade-offs in ranking under a generic fairness formulation, but semi-greedy post-processing can approach the performance of exhaustive post-processing.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.