REVIEW 2 cited by
A Comparison of CPU and GPU implementations for the LHCb Experiment Run 3 Trigger
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Comparison of CPU and GPU implementations for the LHCb Experiment Run 3 Trigger
read the original abstract
The LHCb experiment at CERN is undergoing an upgrade in preparation for the Run 3 data taking period of the LHC. As part of this upgrade the trigger is moving to a fully software implementation operating at the LHC bunch crossing rate. We present an evaluation of a CPU-based and a GPU-based implementation of the first stage of the High Level Trigger. After a detailed comparison both options are found to be viable. This document summarizes the performance and implementation details of these options, the outcome of which has led to the choice of the GPU-based implementation as the baseline.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A converged architecture for processing 32 Tbps of physics data in real-time at the LHCb experiment
LHCb demonstrates a 32 Tbps trigger-less data-acquisition and fully-GPU filter system with 41 MHz peak HLT1 throughput, the highest real-time software data rate in any physics experiment.
-
Track fitting at the full LHC collision rate
A parameterised Kalman filter on GPUs fits full tracks in LHCb's HLT1 trigger at 30 MHz, halving reconstructed D0 and J/ψ mass widths and more than halving ghost-track efficiency.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.