REVIEW 1 cited by
Estimation of time-specific intervention effects on continuously distributed time-to-event outcomes by targeted maximum likelihood estimation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Estimation of time-specific intervention effects on continuously distributed time-to-event outcomes by targeted maximum likelihood estimation
read the original abstract
Targeted maximum likelihood estimation is a general methodology combining flexible ensemble learning and semiparametric efficiency theory in a two-step procedure for estimation of causal parameters. Proposed targeted maximum likelihood procedures for survival and competing risks analysis have so far focused on events taken values in discrete time. We here present a targeted maximum likelihood estimation procedure for event times that take values in R+. We focuson the estimation of intervention-specific mean outcomes with stochastic interventions on a time-fixed treatment. For data-adaptive estimation of nuisance parameters, we propose a new flexible highly adaptive lasso estimation method for continuous-time intensities that can be implemented with L1-penalized Poisson regression. In a simulation study the targeted maximum likelihood estimator based on the highly adaptive lasso estimator proves to be unbiased and achieve proper coverage in agreement with the asymptotic theory and further displays efficiency improvements relative to a Kaplan-Meier approach.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Model-Agnostic Bounds for Augmented Inverse Probability Weighted Estimators' Wald-Confidence Interval Coverage in Randomized Controlled Trials
First Berry-Esseen-type coverage bounds for AIPW Wald intervals with estimated variance in RCTs show cross-fitting can improve coverage through variance overestimation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.