Stochastic tensor space feature theory with applications to robust machine learning

Dingning Liu; Julio Enrique Castrillon-Candas; Kaili Shi; Mark Kon; Sicheng Yang; the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; Xiaoling Zhang

arxiv: 2110.01729 · v6 · submitted 2021-10-04 · 📊 stat.ML · cs.LG

Stochastic tensor space feature theory with applications to robust machine learning

Julio Enrique Castrillon-Candas , Kaili Shi , Dingning Liu , Sicheng Yang , Xiaoling Zhang , Mark Kon , the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 12:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📊 stat.ML cs.LG

keywords stochastic tensor spacesKarhunen-Loeve expansionmultilevel orthogonal subspacesfeature extractionAlzheimer's diseasemachine learning classificationblood plasma datasubspace methods

0 comments

The pith

Modeling data as random fields in stochastic tensor spaces yields multilevel orthogonal subspaces whose projections sharply improve machine learning class separation on Alzheimer's blood data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a Multilevel Orthogonal Subspace Karhunen-Loeve feature theory that treats training data as instances of random fields in a Bochner space. It starts with the nominal class and builds a hierarchy of orthogonal subspaces to isolate anomalous components belonging to other classes. Projection coefficients of input data onto these subspaces become new features that produce clearer separation surfaces for classifiers. On the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative blood plasma dataset, these features deliver much higher accuracy for distinguishing cognitive normal, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia stages than Gradient Boosting, RUS Boost, Random Forest, or Neural Networks.

Core claim

The authors establish that separate machine learning classes often reside predominantly in mostly distinct subspaces. By applying the Karhunen-Loeve expansion to construct a multilevel orthogonal subspace from the first class and treating the second class as an outlier, the projection coefficients of the data into these subspaces become new features. These features enable machine learning classifiers to achieve dramatic accuracy gains on the blood plasma dataset for predicting Alzheimer's disease stages.

What carries the argument

Multilevel Orthogonal Subspace (MOS) Karhunen-Loeve feature theory, which uses a hierarchical expansion of the nominal class in stochastic tensor spaces to produce projection coefficients as robust ML features.

If this is right

Machine learning classifiers trained on the new projection coefficients achieve dramatic accuracy increases on the blood plasma Alzheimer's dataset.
High-accuracy prediction of Alzheimer's stages becomes possible from a non-invasive blood test.
The method supplies a general procedure for constructing robust features when classes occupy distinct subspaces.
The same subspace construction can be used for anomalous signal detection in other classification problems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The approach could be applied to other biomarker or medical imaging datasets where subtle class differences exist.
Hierarchical subspace levels might be tuned to capture finer anomaly scales in complex data.
The extracted coefficients could serve as interpretable inputs to neural network architectures.

Load-bearing premise

Separate machine learning classes can reside predominantly in mostly distinct subspaces.

What would settle it

Applying the projection coefficients as features to the Alzheimer's blood plasma dataset and obtaining no accuracy improvement over Gradient Boosting, RUS Boost, Random Forest, or Neural Networks would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2110.01729 by Dingning Liu, Julio Enrique Castrillon-Candas, Kaili Shi, Mark Kon, Sicheng Yang, the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Xiaoling Zhang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Illustrative example of binary classification with blue and orange dots. For (a) we have that our data are well separated, with blue dots representing the first class and orange dots the second. Due to the separation of the data it is in principle easy to construct a decision boundary. (b) For this case the data classes are mixed, leading to complex boundary decision surfaces that are hard to build, yieldi… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Illustrative example of the separation between the projection coefficients of the nominal class and large anomalous signals based on the coefficients d l k . (a) The orange (nominal class) and blue dots (signal anomaly of the alternative class) corresponds to the original data in the feature space. These observations points are mixed with each other, which makes it hard to build a decision surface. (b) Aft… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: MOS KL training framework for binary classification using SVM. With a slight abuse of notation the map Φ : L 2 (U) → L k∈N0 Sk corresponds to the transformation of the signal u(x, ω) into the spaces L k∈N0 Sk and so provides the projection coefficients. The MOS are built from the classes where more data is available, in this case from the data of class A; NT < m1 samples are chosen ( mA 1 , . . . , mA NT )… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Semi-synthetic test classification results for unbalanced data sets. Accuracy and precision with respect to the number of nested multilevel S0 ⊕ S1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ SLevel. The semi-synthetic data AA for class A is generated for NA = 150, 250, 450, 1500 and 10000 realizations of class A using model (4). Similarly, class B dataset BNB is generated NB = 100 realizations with model (4). Since the size of BNB is NB … view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Accuracy and prediction comparison results between MSVM RBF, SVM RBF, and WSVM RBF as the number of samples in the training datasets increases for class A (ANA). The accuracy and precision for the MSVM RBF classifier (multilevel filtered datasets) are plotted for Level = 6 and with respect to the sample size of the datasets ANA. Notice that as as the dataset ANA becomes more unbalanced, the accuracy and p… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Semi-synthetic test classification results for modified unbalanced data sets. Test #1 is repeated but the realizations of the original datasets ANA, AV NA , BNB and B V N˜B are updated as u A M(x, ωk) ← sin(18u A M(x, ωk)) and u B M(x, ωk) ← sin(18u B M(x, ωk)). (a) The accuracy of all of the methods drops somewhat. However, it is clear that the MSVM RBF method outperforms and is more robust towards the in… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Semi-synthetic test classification results for modified unbalanced data sets. Test #1 is repeated but the realizations of the original datasets ANA, AV NA , BNB and B V N˜B are updated as u A M(x, ωk) ← sin(20u A M(x, ωk)) and u B M(x, ωk) ← sin(20u B M(x, ωk)). (a) For this dataset we observe that the MSVM RBF method significantly outperforms the best results from WSVM RBF and linear methods. In particula… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Comparison test for CN (Cognitive Normal subjects) vs AD participants. Accuracy and ROC curves (for the last level) for Multilevel features (with Radial SVM) compared to SVM with the original features are shown. The accuracy for the Multilevel features are plotted for each nested level. It is observed that the accuracy increases from 48.3% to 89.11% by using RBF SVM with the multilevel features. For the sa… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

In this paper we develop a Multilevel Orthogonal Subspace (MOS) Karhunen-Loeve feature theory based on stochastic tensor spaces, for the construction of robust machine learning features. Training data are treated as instances of a random field within a relevant Bochner space. Our key observation is that separate machine learning classes can reside predominantly in mostly distinct subspaces. Using the Karhunen-Loeve expansion and a hierarchical expansion of the first (nominal) class, a MOS is constructed to detect anomalous signal components, treating the second class as an outlier of the first. The projection coefficients of the input data into these subspaces are then used to train a Machine Learning (ML) classifier. These coefficients become new features from which much clearer separation surfaces can arise for the underlying classes. Tests in the blood plasma dataset (Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative) show dramatic increases in accuracy. This contrast to popular ML methods such as Gradient Boosting, RUS Boost, Random Forest and Neural Networks. We show that with a non-invasive blood test, high-accuracy results can be obtained for predicting AD stages such as cognitive normal, mild cognitive impairment and dementia.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper introduces a multilevel orthogonal subspace Karhunen-Loeve construction on stochastic tensor spaces to create ML features by treating one class as an outlier, but the abstract states the key subspace-separation assumption without any verification on the ADNI data and supplies no numbers or protocol details for the claimed accuracy gains.

read the letter

The main thing here is a new feature construction that starts from the Karhunen-Loeve expansion of the nominal class in a Bochner space, builds a hierarchy of orthogonal subspaces, and feeds the resulting projection coefficients into a downstream classifier. The abstract presents this as a way to get clearer separation when classes occupy mostly distinct subspaces, and it applies the idea to blood-plasma measurements for staging Alzheimer's (CN, MCI, dementia) with claims of big gains over Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and neural nets. That construction is the actual new piece; the rest follows standard KL and subspace ideas but packages them for this outlier-detection framing. If the subspaces really are distinct, the coefficients could serve as useful features, and the clinical angle (non-invasive blood test) is a reasonable target application. The paper does a clean job stating the observation and the forward construction in a few sentences. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress-test note flags: the assumption that classes live in mostly distinct subspaces is asserted but never checked for this dataset. No principal angles, no overlap norms, no before-and-after accuracy deltas appear in the abstract. The dramatic accuracy increases are stated without numbers, error bars, sample sizes, or comparison details, so the central claim cannot be evaluated. This leaves open the possibility that the reported gains do not materialize if the plasma features overlap substantially. The work is aimed at people who build tensor or functional-data features for classification, especially in medical settings. A reader already working on KL expansions or robust subspace methods might extract the construction and test it themselves. It does not yet deserve a serious referee because the load-bearing assumption is unverified and the experimental claims lack the minimal supporting information needed for assessment. The manuscript would need to add those checks and the actual results before it could be sent out.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Multilevel Orthogonal Subspace (MOS) Karhunen-Loeve feature theory based on stochastic tensor spaces. Training data are modeled as random fields in a Bochner space; a hierarchical KL expansion of the nominal class constructs an MOS to detect outlier signal components from other classes, with the resulting projection coefficients serving as new features for an ML classifier. The central empirical claim is that this yields dramatic accuracy gains on the ADNI blood-plasma dataset for distinguishing cognitive normal, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia stages, outperforming Gradient Boosting, RUS Boost, Random Forest, and Neural Networks.

Significance. If the accuracy gains are reproducible and the subspace-separation premise holds for the data, the work would supply a theoretically grounded feature-construction technique that exploits distinct class subspaces via KL expansions, potentially improving robustness in medical classification tasks where non-invasive biomarkers are used.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the claim of 'dramatic increases in accuracy' on the ADNI dataset supplies no numerical values, error bars, dataset sizes, cross-validation protocol, or baseline numbers, rendering the central performance claim impossible to evaluate.
[Abstract] Abstract (key observation paragraph): the premise that 'separate machine learning classes can reside predominantly in mostly distinct subspaces' is stated without any supporting calculation (principal angles, subspace overlap norms, or pre-/post-projection accuracy deltas) for the blood-plasma features; this premise is load-bearing because the MOS construction and outlier detection rely on it to produce clearer separation surfaces.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The sentence 'This contrast to popular ML methods...' is grammatically incomplete and should be rephrased for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of 'dramatic increases in accuracy' on the ADNI dataset supplies no numerical values, error bars, dataset sizes, cross-validation protocol, or baseline numbers, rendering the central performance claim impossible to evaluate.

Authors: We agree that the abstract should be self-contained with respect to the central empirical claim. The main text reports specific accuracy values, dataset details from the ADNI blood-plasma cohort, the cross-validation protocol, and comparisons against Gradient Boosting, RUS Boost, Random Forest, and Neural Networks. In the revised manuscript we will move these quantitative details into the abstract so that the performance claim can be evaluated directly from it. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (key observation paragraph): the premise that 'separate machine learning classes can reside predominantly in mostly distinct subspaces' is stated without any supporting calculation (principal angles, subspace overlap norms, or pre-/post-projection accuracy deltas) for the blood-plasma features; this premise is load-bearing because the MOS construction and outlier detection rely on it to produce clearer separation surfaces.

Authors: The premise is foundational and is supported in the body of the paper by the observed accuracy gains after projection onto the MOS. However, we acknowledge that the abstract itself contains no explicit supporting metrics such as principal angles or overlap norms. We will revise the abstract (and, if space permits, add a short supporting sentence in the introduction) to reference the pre- versus post-projection accuracy deltas already computed in the results section, thereby making the load-bearing assumption more transparent. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation proceeds from KL expansions to empirical classifier accuracy

full rationale

The paper defines the MOS construction explicitly from the hierarchical KL expansion of the nominal class in the Bochner space, projects the second class as an outlier, and feeds the resulting coefficients into a downstream ML classifier whose accuracy is measured on held-out ADNI data. No equation reduces a reported performance number to a fitted parameter or label-derived quantity by construction, and no self-citation is invoked as a load-bearing uniqueness or ansatz step. The subspace-distinctness observation is an explicit modeling assumption whose empirical consequences are tested rather than presupposed.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Ledger populated exclusively from statements in the abstract; full paper may contain additional fitted parameters or background results not visible here.

axioms (1)

domain assumption separate machine learning classes can reside predominantly in mostly distinct subspaces
Explicitly stated as the key observation that enables construction of the MOS to treat the second class as an outlier.

invented entities (1)

Multilevel Orthogonal Subspace (MOS) no independent evidence
purpose: To detect anomalous signal components by treating the second class as an outlier of the first via hierarchical KL expansion
Introduced as the central construct for generating the new projection-coefficient features.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5754 in / 1370 out tokens · 51226 ms · 2026-05-24T12:56:45.535024+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Distribution-Free Stochastic Analysis and Robust Multilevel Vector Field Anomaly Detection
stat.ML 2022-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Presents a distribution-free multilevel vector field anomaly detection technique based on Karhunen-Loeve expansions that forms hypothesis tests without distributional assumptions and detects subtle anomalies missed by...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

[1]

J. E. Castrill´ on-Cand´ as and Kevin Amaratunga. Spatially adapted multiwavelets and sparse representation of integral equations on general geometries. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , 24(5):1530–1566, 2003

work page 2003
[2]

Castrill´ on-Cand´ as and Kevin Amaratunga

Julio E. Castrill´ on-Cand´ as and Kevin Amaratunga. Fast estimation of continuous Karhunen-Loeve eigenfunctions using wavelets. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , 50(1):78–86, 2002

work page 2002
[3]

Castrill´ on-Cand´ as and Mark Kon

Julio E. Castrill´ on-Cand´ as and Mark Kon. Anomaly detection: A functional analysis perspective. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 189:104885, 2022

work page 2022
[4]

Distribution-Free Stochastic Analysis and Robust Multilevel Vector Field Anomaly Detection

Julio E Castrillon-Candas and Mark Kon. Stochastic functional analysis and multilevel vector field anomaly detection, 2022. arXiv:2207.06229

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[5]

An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods

Nello Cristianini and John Shawe-Taylor. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods. Cambridge University Press, 2000

work page 2000
[6]

D’Heedene, K

S. D’Heedene, K. Amaratunga, and J. E. Castrill´ on-Cand´ as. Generalized hierarchical bases: a wavelet-ritz- galerkin framework for lagrangian FEM. Engineering Computations, 22(1):15–37, 2005

work page 2005
[7]

Flamholz, Noam Prywes, Uri Moran, Dan Davidi, Yinon M

Avi I. Flamholz, Noam Prywes, Uri Moran, Dan Davidi, Yinon M. Bar-On, Luke M. Oltrogge, Rui Alves, David Savage, and Ron Milo. Revisiting trade-offs between rubisco kinetic parameters.Biochemistry, 58(31):3365–3376,

work page
[8]

Analysis of the domain mapping method for elliptic diffusion problems on random domains

Helmut Harbrecht, Michael Peters, and Markus Siebenmorgen. Analysis of the domain mapping method for elliptic diffusion problems on random domains. Numerische Mathematik, 134(4):823–856, 2016

work page 2016
[9]

Yu, Ann B

Lifang He, Xiangnan Kong, Philip S. Yu, Ann B. Ragin, Zhifeng Hao, and Xiaowei Yang. Dusk: A dual structure- preserving kernel for supervised tensor learning with applications to neuroimages, 2014

work page 2014
[10]

Yu, and Ann B

Lifang He, Chun-Ta Lu, Hao Ding, Shen Wang, Linlin Shen, Philip S. Yu, and Ann B. Ragin. Multi-way multi- level kernel modeling for neuroimaging classification. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 6846–6854, 2017

work page 2017
[11]

Yu, and Ann B

Lifang He, Chun-Ta Lu, Guixiang Ma, Shen Wang, Linlin Shen, Philip S. Yu, and Ann B. Ragin. Kernelized support tensor machines. In Doina Precup and Yee Whye Teh, editors, Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning , volume 70 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 1442–1451. PMLR, 06–11 Aug 2017

work page 2017
[12]

Horv´ ath and P

L. Horv´ ath and P. Kokoszka.Inference for Functional Data with Applications . Springer, 2012

work page 2012
[13]

Kokoszka and M

P. Kokoszka and M. Reimherr. Introduction to Functional Data Analysis . CRC Press, 1 edition, 2017. 15

work page 2017
[14]

A weighted subspace exponential kernel for support tensor machines, 2023

Kirandeep Kour, Sergey Dolgov, Peter Benner, Martin Stoll, and Max Pfeffer. A weighted subspace exponential kernel for support tensor machines, 2023

work page 2023
[15]

Efficient structure-preserving support tensor train machine

Kirandeep Kour, Sergey Dolgov, Martin Stoll, and Peter Benner. Efficient structure-preserving support tensor train machine. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 24(4):1–22, 2023

work page 2023
[16]

Machine learning in enzyme engineering

Stanislav Mazurenko, Zbynek Prokop, and Jiri Damborsky. Machine learning in enzyme engineering. ACS Catal- ysis, 10(2):1210–1223, 2020

work page 2020
[17]

Adam McCormack and Charles P. DeLisi. Stochastic multilevel orthogonal subspaces for RuBisCO Engineering. In preparation, 2022

work page 2022
[18]

Pramuditha Perera, Poojan Oza, and Vishal M. Patel. One-class classification: A survey, 2021

work page 2021
[19]

R. C. Petersen, P. S. Aisen, L. A. Beckett, M. C. Donohue, A. C. Gamst, D. J. Harvey, Jr C. R. Jack, W. J. Jagust, L. M. Shaw, A. W. Toga, J. Q. Trojanowski, and M. W. Weiner. Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (adni). Neurology, 74(3):201–209, 2010

work page 2010
[20]

Mesirov, Tomaso Poggio, William Gerald, Massimo Loda, Eric S

Sridhar Ramaswamy, Pablo Tamayo, Ryan Rifkin, Sayan Mukherjee, Chen-Hsiang Yeang, Michael Angelo, Chris- tine Ladd, Michael Reich, Eva Latulippe, Jill P. Mesirov, Tomaso Poggio, William Gerald, Massimo Loda, Eric S. Lander, and Todd R. Golub. Multiclass cancer diagnosis using tumor gene expression signatures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science...

work page 2001
[21]

Christoph Schwab and Radu A. Todor. Karhunen–Lo` eve approximation of random fields by generalized fast multipole methods. Journal of Computational Physics , 217(1):100 – 122, 2006. Uncertainty Quantification in Simulation Science

work page 2006
[22]

Tan, Daniel Q

Aik C. Tan, Daniel Q. Naiman, Lei Xu, Raimond L. Winslow, and Donald Geman. Simple decision rules for classifying human cancers from gene expression profiles. Bioinformatics, 21(20):3896–3904, 08 2005

work page 2005
[23]

A weighted support vector machine method for control chart pattern recognition

Petros Xanthopoulos and Talayeh Razzaghi. A weighted support vector machine method for control chart pattern recognition. Computers & Industrial Engineering , 70:134–149, 2014. 16

work page 2014

[1] [1]

J. E. Castrill´ on-Cand´ as and Kevin Amaratunga. Spatially adapted multiwavelets and sparse representation of integral equations on general geometries. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , 24(5):1530–1566, 2003

work page 2003

[2] [2]

Castrill´ on-Cand´ as and Kevin Amaratunga

Julio E. Castrill´ on-Cand´ as and Kevin Amaratunga. Fast estimation of continuous Karhunen-Loeve eigenfunctions using wavelets. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , 50(1):78–86, 2002

work page 2002

[3] [3]

Castrill´ on-Cand´ as and Mark Kon

Julio E. Castrill´ on-Cand´ as and Mark Kon. Anomaly detection: A functional analysis perspective. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 189:104885, 2022

work page 2022

[4] [4]

Distribution-Free Stochastic Analysis and Robust Multilevel Vector Field Anomaly Detection

Julio E Castrillon-Candas and Mark Kon. Stochastic functional analysis and multilevel vector field anomaly detection, 2022. arXiv:2207.06229

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

[5] [5]

An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods

Nello Cristianini and John Shawe-Taylor. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods. Cambridge University Press, 2000

work page 2000

[6] [6]

D’Heedene, K

S. D’Heedene, K. Amaratunga, and J. E. Castrill´ on-Cand´ as. Generalized hierarchical bases: a wavelet-ritz- galerkin framework for lagrangian FEM. Engineering Computations, 22(1):15–37, 2005

work page 2005

[7] [7]

Flamholz, Noam Prywes, Uri Moran, Dan Davidi, Yinon M

Avi I. Flamholz, Noam Prywes, Uri Moran, Dan Davidi, Yinon M. Bar-On, Luke M. Oltrogge, Rui Alves, David Savage, and Ron Milo. Revisiting trade-offs between rubisco kinetic parameters.Biochemistry, 58(31):3365–3376,

work page

[8] [8]

Analysis of the domain mapping method for elliptic diffusion problems on random domains

Helmut Harbrecht, Michael Peters, and Markus Siebenmorgen. Analysis of the domain mapping method for elliptic diffusion problems on random domains. Numerische Mathematik, 134(4):823–856, 2016

work page 2016

[9] [9]

Yu, Ann B

Lifang He, Xiangnan Kong, Philip S. Yu, Ann B. Ragin, Zhifeng Hao, and Xiaowei Yang. Dusk: A dual structure- preserving kernel for supervised tensor learning with applications to neuroimages, 2014

work page 2014

[10] [10]

Yu, and Ann B

Lifang He, Chun-Ta Lu, Hao Ding, Shen Wang, Linlin Shen, Philip S. Yu, and Ann B. Ragin. Multi-way multi- level kernel modeling for neuroimaging classification. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 6846–6854, 2017

work page 2017

[11] [11]

Yu, and Ann B

Lifang He, Chun-Ta Lu, Guixiang Ma, Shen Wang, Linlin Shen, Philip S. Yu, and Ann B. Ragin. Kernelized support tensor machines. In Doina Precup and Yee Whye Teh, editors, Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning , volume 70 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 1442–1451. PMLR, 06–11 Aug 2017

work page 2017

[12] [12]

Horv´ ath and P

L. Horv´ ath and P. Kokoszka.Inference for Functional Data with Applications . Springer, 2012

work page 2012

[13] [13]

Kokoszka and M

P. Kokoszka and M. Reimherr. Introduction to Functional Data Analysis . CRC Press, 1 edition, 2017. 15

work page 2017

[14] [14]

A weighted subspace exponential kernel for support tensor machines, 2023

Kirandeep Kour, Sergey Dolgov, Peter Benner, Martin Stoll, and Max Pfeffer. A weighted subspace exponential kernel for support tensor machines, 2023

work page 2023

[15] [15]

Efficient structure-preserving support tensor train machine

Kirandeep Kour, Sergey Dolgov, Martin Stoll, and Peter Benner. Efficient structure-preserving support tensor train machine. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 24(4):1–22, 2023

work page 2023

[16] [16]

Machine learning in enzyme engineering

Stanislav Mazurenko, Zbynek Prokop, and Jiri Damborsky. Machine learning in enzyme engineering. ACS Catal- ysis, 10(2):1210–1223, 2020

work page 2020

[17] [17]

Adam McCormack and Charles P. DeLisi. Stochastic multilevel orthogonal subspaces for RuBisCO Engineering. In preparation, 2022

work page 2022

[18] [18]

Pramuditha Perera, Poojan Oza, and Vishal M. Patel. One-class classification: A survey, 2021

work page 2021

[19] [19]

R. C. Petersen, P. S. Aisen, L. A. Beckett, M. C. Donohue, A. C. Gamst, D. J. Harvey, Jr C. R. Jack, W. J. Jagust, L. M. Shaw, A. W. Toga, J. Q. Trojanowski, and M. W. Weiner. Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (adni). Neurology, 74(3):201–209, 2010

work page 2010

[20] [20]

Mesirov, Tomaso Poggio, William Gerald, Massimo Loda, Eric S

Sridhar Ramaswamy, Pablo Tamayo, Ryan Rifkin, Sayan Mukherjee, Chen-Hsiang Yeang, Michael Angelo, Chris- tine Ladd, Michael Reich, Eva Latulippe, Jill P. Mesirov, Tomaso Poggio, William Gerald, Massimo Loda, Eric S. Lander, and Todd R. Golub. Multiclass cancer diagnosis using tumor gene expression signatures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science...

work page 2001

[21] [21]

Christoph Schwab and Radu A. Todor. Karhunen–Lo` eve approximation of random fields by generalized fast multipole methods. Journal of Computational Physics , 217(1):100 – 122, 2006. Uncertainty Quantification in Simulation Science

work page 2006

[22] [22]

Tan, Daniel Q

Aik C. Tan, Daniel Q. Naiman, Lei Xu, Raimond L. Winslow, and Donald Geman. Simple decision rules for classifying human cancers from gene expression profiles. Bioinformatics, 21(20):3896–3904, 08 2005

work page 2005

[23] [23]

A weighted support vector machine method for control chart pattern recognition

Petros Xanthopoulos and Talayeh Razzaghi. A weighted support vector machine method for control chart pattern recognition. Computers & Industrial Engineering , 70:134–149, 2014. 16

work page 2014