Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Nested hat R: Assessing the convergence of Markov chain Monte Carlo when running many short chains

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.13017 v6 pith:GT5RIKQY submitted 2021-10-25 stat.ME

Nested hat R: Assessing the convergence of Markov chain Monte Carlo when running many short chains

classification stat.ME
keywords chainschainwidehatmarkovnestedphasecarloclassical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Recent developments in parallel Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms allow us to run thousands of chains almost as quickly as a single chain, using hardware accelerators such as GPUs. While each chain still needs to forget its initial point during a warmup phase, the subsequent sampling phase can be shorter than in classical settings, where we run only a few chains. To determine if the resulting short chains are reliable, we need to assess how close the Markov chains are to their stationary distribution after warmup. The potential scale reduction factor $\widehat R$ is a popular convergence diagnostic but unfortunately can require a long sampling phase to work well. We present a nested design to overcome this challenge and a generalization called nested $\widehat R$. This new diagnostic works under conditions similar to $\widehat R$ and completes the workflow for GPU-friendly samplers. In addition, the proposed nesting provides theoretical insights into the utility of $\widehat R$, in both classical and short-chains regimes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Comparative study of Bayesian and Frequentist methods for epidemic forecasting: Insights from simulated and historical data

    q-bio.QM 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0

    Neither Bayesian nor frequentist fitting is uniformly better for epidemic forecasts; performance depends on phase and data, though the paper's own results undercut its phase-specific claims.