Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Cross-Batch Negative Sampling for Training Two-Tower Recommenders

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.15154 v1 pith:TF6IPNIF submitted 2021-10-28 cs.IR

Cross-Batch Negative Sampling for Training Two-Tower Recommenders

classification cs.IR
keywords samplingtrainingtwo-toweritemnegativecbnscross-batchlarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The two-tower architecture has been widely applied for learning item and user representations, which is important for large-scale recommender systems. Many two-tower models are trained using various in-batch negative sampling strategies, where the effects of such strategies inherently rely on the size of mini-batches. However, training two-tower models with a large batch size is inefficient, as it demands a large volume of memory for item and user contents and consumes a lot of time for feature encoding. Interestingly, we find that neural encoders can output relatively stable features for the same input after warming up in the training process. Based on such facts, we propose a simple yet effective sampling strategy called Cross-Batch Negative Sampling (CBNS), which takes advantage of the encoded item embeddings from recent mini-batches to boost the model training. Both theoretical analysis and empirical evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness and the efficiency of CBNS.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Case Against Generation for Retrieval: Discriminative Language Models as Effective Retrievers

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    LLM-native two-tower retrieval with EOS pooling, cross-dataset transfer, distillation from a cross-encoder, and latent user reasoning reaches SoTA-comparable recall on Amazon benchmarks.

  2. The Case Against Generation for Retrieval: Discriminative Language Models as Effective Retrievers

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    A shared-encoder two-tower retriever built from a 0.6B LLM matches or beats an 8B generative recommender on Recall@10 across three Amazon datasets.