SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarization
read the original abstract
In the summarization domain, a key requirement for summaries is to be factually consistent with the input document. Previous work has found that natural language inference (NLI) models do not perform competitively when applied to inconsistency detection. In this work, we revisit the use of NLI for inconsistency detection, finding that past work suffered from a mismatch in input granularity between NLI datasets (sentence-level), and inconsistency detection (document level). We provide a highly effective and light-weight method called SummaCConv that enables NLI models to be successfully used for this task by segmenting documents into sentence units and aggregating scores between pairs of sentences. On our newly introduced benchmark called SummaC (Summary Consistency) consisting of six large inconsistency detection datasets, SummaCConv obtains state-of-the-art results with a balanced accuracy of 74.4%, a 5% point improvement compared to prior work. We make the models and datasets available: https://github.com/tingofurro/summac
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
ProvenanceGuard: Source-Aware Factuality Verification for MCP-Based LLM Agents
ProvenanceGuard decomposes MCP-agent answers into atomic claims, routes them to source-specific evidence via stable IDs, verifies support and attribution with NLI and token alignment, and outputs per-claim verdicts pl...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.