Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

How Bad Are Artifacts?: Analyzing the Impact of Speech Enhancement Errors on ASR

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.06685 v2 pith:2G6SGFIE submitted 2022-01-18 eess.AS cs.SD

How Bad Are Artifacts?: Analyzing the Impact of Speech Enhancement Errors on ASR

classification eess.AS cs.SD
keywords performancespeechartifacterrorsaddingcomponentcomponentsdegradation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

It is challenging to improve automatic speech recognition (ASR) performance in noisy conditions with single-channel speech enhancement (SE). In this paper, we investigate the causes of ASR performance degradation by decomposing the SE errors using orthogonal projection-based decomposition (OPD). OPD decomposes the SE errors into noise and artifact components. The artifact component is defined as the SE error signal that cannot be represented as a linear combination of speech and noise sources. We propose manually scaling the error components to analyze their impact on ASR. We experimentally identify the artifact component as the main cause of performance degradation, and we find that mitigating the artifact can greatly improve ASR performance. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the simple observation adding (OA) technique (i.e., adding a scaled version of the observed signal to the enhanced speech) can monotonically increase the signal-to-artifact ratio under a mild condition. Accordingly, we experimentally confirm that OA improves ASR performance for both simulated and real recordings. The findings of this paper provide a better understanding of the influence of SE errors on ASR and open the door to future research on novel approaches for designing effective single-channel SE front-ends for ASR.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Where Speech Enhancement Hurts Recognition: An Inference Time Polar Projection Diagnosis

    eess.AS 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Magnitude strength, not estimated phase, drives SE-induced ASR degradation, and the optimal strength is recognizer-dependent (strong for wav2vec 2.0, mild for Whisper).

  2. Training-Free Intelligibility-Guided Observation Addition for Noisy ASR

    eess.AS 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Mixing noisy and enhanced speech with weights derived from the recognizer's confidence on each signal reduces ASR word error rate without any additional training.