Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Counter Hate Speech in Social Media: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.03584 v1 pith:VRF6K3FK submitted 2022-02-21 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords socialmediaimpactspeechworksattemptgenerationhate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the high prevalence of offensive language against minorities in social media, counter-hate speeches (CHS) generation is considered an automatic way of tackling this challenge. The CHS is supposed to appear as a third voice to educate people and keep the social [red lines bold] without limiting the principles of freedom of speech. In this paper, we review the most important research in the past and present with a main focus on methodologies, collected datasets and statistical analysis CHS's impact on social media. The CHS generation is based on the optimistic assumption that any attempt to intervene the hate speech in social media can play a positive role in this context. Beyond that, previous works ignored the investigation of the sequence of comments before and after the CHS. However, the positive impact is not guaranteed, as shown in some previous works. To the best of our knowledge, no attempt has been made to survey the related work to compare the past research in terms of CHS's impact on social media. We take the first step in this direction by providing a comprehensive review on related works and categorizing them based on different factors including impact, methodology, data source, etc.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can NLP Tackle Hate Speech in the Real World? Stakeholder-Informed Feedback and Survey on Counterspeech

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    NLP counterspeech research increasingly relies on recycled datasets and excludes the affected communities, according to a systematic review and NGO case study.

  2. HatePRISM: Policies, Platforms, and Research Integration. Advancing NLP for Hate Speech Proactive Mitigation

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A tri-partite survey finds that hate speech definitions and moderation practices in country laws, platform policies, and NLP datasets are largely misaligned, and calls for a unified proactive moderation framework.

Pith tools