Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

AGQA 2.0: An Updated Benchmark for Compositional Spatio-Temporal Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.06105 v1 pith:Z5JZEQ5D submitted 2022-04-12 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords agqabenchmarkbiasescompositionalreasoningseveralupdatedaction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Prior benchmarks have analyzed models' answers to questions about videos in order to measure visual compositional reasoning. Action Genome Question Answering (AGQA) is one such benchmark. AGQA provides a training/test split with balanced answer distributions to reduce the effect of linguistic biases. However, some biases remain in several AGQA categories. We introduce AGQA 2.0, a version of this benchmark with several improvements, most namely a stricter balancing procedure. We then report results on the updated benchmark for all experiments.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. POVQA: Preference-Optimized Video Question Answering with Rationales for Data Efficiency

    cs.CV 2025-10 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    POVQA reports large F1 gains on a new 239-example video QA dataset after rationale-based fine-tuning, but its own keyframe-only ablation matches the full pooling pipeline, and fine-tuning hurts zero-shot TVQA accuracy.

Pith tools