REVIEW 4 cited by
Cordial Miners: Fast and Efficient Consensus for Every Eventuality
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Cordial Miners: Fast and Efficient Consensus for Every Eventuality
read the original abstract
Cordial Miners are a family of efficient Byzantine Atomic Broadcast protocols, with instances for asynchrony and eventual synchrony. They improve the latency of state-of-the-art DAG-based protocols by almost 2X and achieve optimal good-case complexity of O(n) by forgoing Reliable Broadcast as a building block. Rather, Cordial Miners use the blocklace -- a partially-ordered counterpart of the totally-ordered blockchain data structure -- to implement the three algorithmic components of consensus: Dissemination, equivocation-exclusion, and ordering.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Multimmit: Extending Blocks for Faster Finality
Multimmit finalises transaction blocks in one voting round with roughly 3δ average latency from dissemination, confining a faulty producer's damage to its own chain.
-
The Carnot Bound: Limits and Possibilities for Bandwidth-Efficient Consensus
A lower bound of ~2.5 on data expansion for 2-round-finality consensus, plus two 3-round protocols that achieve expansion approaching 1 under good conditions.
-
The Carnot Bound: Limits and Possibilities for Bandwidth-Efficient Consensus
Two-round-finality leader-based consensus cannot beat ~2.5 data expansion; three-round Carnot protocols reach near-1 under favorable conditions and 1.33–1.5 under attack.
-
Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions
Consensus is lawful collapse of order-2 communication evidence into order-1 outputs under legitimacy, horizon, and repair rules.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.