pith. sign in

arxiv: 2209.04764 · v3 · pith:7Z7QGHXTnew · submitted 2022-09-11 · 💰 econ.GN · q-fin.EC

A Mathematical Analysis of the 2022 Alaska Special Election for US House

classification 💰 econ.GN q-fin.EC
keywords electionchoiceparadoxvotingwinneralaskademonstratedhouse
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The August 2022 Alaska Special Election for US House contained many interesting features from the perspective of social choice theory. This election used instant runoff voting (often referred to as ranked choice voting) to elect a winner, and many of the weaknesses of this voting method were on display in this election. For example, the Condorcet winner is different from the instant runoff winner, and the election demonstrated a monotonicity paradox. The election also demonstrated a no show paradox; as far as we are aware, this election represents the first document American ranked choice election to demonstrate this paradox.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification for Ranked Choice Voting Polls

    stat.AP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A Bayesian framework that uses conjugate priors to estimate win probabilities for candidates in ranked choice voting polls.