Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Gathering Strength, Gathering Storms: The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence (AI100) 2021 Study Panel Report

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.15767 v1 pith:DK5QF6BZ submitted 2022-10-27 cs.AI

Michael L. Littman , Ifeoma Ajunwa , Guy Berger , Craig Boutilier , Morgan Currie , Finale Doshi-Velez , Gillian Hadfield , Michael C. Horowitz
show 9 more authors
Charles Isbell Hiroaki Kitano Karen Levy Terah Lyons Melanie Mitchell Julie Shah Steven Sloman Shannon Vallor Toby Walsh
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.AI
keywords gatheringreportai100artificialintelligencechairedeffectshundred
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In September 2021, the "One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence" project (AI100) issued the second report of its planned long-term periodic assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on society. It was written by a panel of 17 study authors, each of whom is deeply rooted in AI research, chaired by Michael Littman of Brown University. The report, entitled "Gathering Strength, Gathering Storms," answers a set of 14 questions probing critical areas of AI development addressing the major risks and dangers of AI, its effects on society, its public perception and the future of the field. The report concludes that AI has made a major leap from the lab to people's lives in recent years, which increases the urgency to understand its potential negative effects. The questions were developed by the AI100 Standing Committee, chaired by Peter Stone of the University of Texas at Austin, consisting of a group of AI leaders with expertise in computer science, sociology, ethics, economics, and other disciplines.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Essentials of AI for Life and Society: An AI Literacy Course for the University Community

    cs.AI 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Participants in a 14-week AI literacy course for a broad university audience self-reported gains on all ten AI literacy survey questions, but no objective or independent measure of learning was used.

  2. Shaping AI's Impact on Billions of Lives

    cs.AI 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    A policy essay proposing five guidelines and 18 milestone prizes to direct AI research and deployment toward public benefit.

  3. A Vision Toward Energy-Efficient Domain-Specific Artificial Intelligence Models and Agents

    cs.AI 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A position paper proposing compact, domain-specific AI agents as the path to ≥1000× energy efficiency, without demonstrating the claim.

Pith tools