REVIEW 1 cited by
Inertial Updating
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Inertial Updating
read the original abstract
We introduce and characterize inertial updating of beliefs. Under inertial updating, a decision maker (DM) chooses a belief that minimizes the subjective distance between their prior belief and the set of beliefs consistent with the observed event. Importantly, by varying the subjective notion of distance, inertial updating provides a unifying framework that nests three different types of belief updating: (i) Bayesian updating, (ii) non-Bayesian updating rules, and (iii) updating rules for events with zero probability, including the conditional probability system (CPS) of Myerson (1986a,b). We demonstrate that our model is behaviorally equivalent to the Hypothesis Testing model (HT) of Ortoleva (2012), clarifying the connection between HT and CPS. We apply our model to a persuasion game.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Learning from an Unknown DGP: Experimental Evidence on Belief Updating with AI Recommendations
With qualitative AI advice and an unknown DGP, belief updates show confirmation inertia at extremes, large reaction to contradiction, and weaker intermediate moves, better fit by CR/wIU than quasi-Bayes.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.