Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Exploring the likelihood of the 21-cm power spectrum with simulation-based inference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.03074 v2 pith:ETYJXTWN submitted 2023-05-04 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA

Exploring the likelihood of the 21-cm power spectrum with simulation-based inference

classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords likelihoodinferenceestimatinggaussiansingleclassicalcommoncorresponding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Observations of the cosmic 21-cm power spectrum (PS) are starting to enable precision Bayesian inference of galaxy properties and physical cosmology, during the first billion years of our Universe. Here we investigate the impact of common approximations about the likelihood used in such inferences, including: (i) assuming a Gaussian functional form; (ii) estimating the mean from a single realization; and (iii) estimating the (co)variance at a single point in parameter space. We compare "classical" inference that uses an explicit likelihood with simulation based inference (SBI) that estimates the likelihood from a training set. Our forward-models include: (i) realizations of the cosmic 21-cm signal computed with 21cmFAST by varying UV and X-ray galaxy parameters together with the initial conditions; (ii) realizations of the telescope noise corresponding to a 1000 h integration with SKA1-Low; (iii) the excision of Fourier modes corresponding to a foreground-dominated, horizon "wedge". We find that the 1D PS likelihood is well described by a Gaussian accounting for covariances between wavemodes and redshift bins (higher order correlations are small). However, common approaches of estimating the forward-modeled mean and (co)variance from a random realization or at a single point in parameter space result in biased and over-constrained posteriors. Our best results come from using SBI to fit a non-Gaussian likelihood with a Gaussian mixture neural density estimator. Such SBI can be performed with up to an order of magnitude fewer simulations than classical, explicit likelihood inference. Thus SBI provides accurate posteriors at a comparably low computational cost.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing initial isocurvature perturbation with 21cm one-point statistics

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    A Fisher forecast from 21cmFAST simulations shows 21cm variance can constrain the CDM isocurvature fraction to about 3e-4 with SKA, while skewness is an order of magnitude weaker.

  2. Machine Learning and the SKA for Cosmic Dawn and the Epoch of Reionization

    astro-ph.IM 2026-07 accept novelty 2.5

    A multi-author overview of machine-learning algorithms proposed for instrument modelling, data analysis, simulation and inference in SKA Cosmic Dawn and Epoch of Reionization science.