pith. sign in

arxiv: 2306.13723 · v2 · pith:RPWSO5FKnew · submitted 2023-06-23 · 💻 cs.AI

Human-AI Coevolution

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords human-aicoevolutionfeedbackloopcomplexitysciencechoicesfield
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Human-AI coevolution, defined as a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other, increasingly characterises our society, but is understudied in artificial intelligence and complexity science literature. Recommender systems and assistants play a prominent role in human-AI coevolution, as they permeate many facets of daily life and influence human choices on online platforms. The interaction between users and AI results in a potentially endless feedback loop, wherein users' choices generate data to train AI models, which, in turn, shape subsequent user preferences. This human-AI feedback loop has peculiar characteristics compared to traditional human-machine interaction and gives rise to complex and often ``unintended'' social outcomes. This paper introduces Coevolution AI as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science focused on the theoretical, empirical, and mathematical investigation of the human-AI feedback loop. In doing so, we: (i) outline the pros and cons of existing methodologies and highlight shortcomings and potential ways for capturing feedback loop mechanisms; (ii) propose a reflection at the intersection between complexity science, AI and society; (iii) provide real-world examples for different human-AI ecosystems; and (iv) illustrate challenges to the creation of such a field of study, conceptualising them at increasing levels of abstraction, i.e., technical, epistemological, legal and socio-political.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A field experiment of social influence and behavioral contagion with bots on Reddit

    cs.SI 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Field experiment finds symbolic awards on Reddit do not boost user activity or impact and can reduce them when from bots with lottery rationale, but they do encourage direct communication.

  2. Co-Ontogeny by Archetypal Scaffolding: The Humorphic Partnership

    cs.HC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Defines and traces the humorphic partnership via a four-month single-subject study with a personal AI agent, reporting growth-witnessing interactions, honest zero-effectiveness self-reports, and open-source release wi...