Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Survey of AI Music Generation Tools and Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.12982 v1 pith:KWWF2BZI submitted 2023-08-24 cs.SD cs.AIcs.HCeess.AS

Yueyue Zhu , Jared Baca , Banafsheh Rekabdar , Reza Rawassizadeh This is my paper
classification cs.SDcs.AIcs.HCeess.AS
keywords generationmusicsurveytoolscomprehensivetooladvantagesanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we provide a comprehensive survey of AI music generation tools, including both research projects and commercialized applications. To conduct our analysis, we classified music generation approaches into three categories: parameter-based, text-based, and visual-based classes. Our survey highlights the diverse possibilities and functional features of these tools, which cater to a wide range of users, from regular listeners to professional musicians. We observed that each tool has its own set of advantages and limitations. As a result, we have compiled a comprehensive list of these factors that should be considered during the tool selection process. Moreover, our survey offers critical insights into the underlying mechanisms and challenges of AI music generation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Auto-Regressive vs Flow-Matching: a Comparative Study of Modeling Paradigms for Text-to-Music Generation

    cs.SD 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under matched training conditions, auto-regressive models slightly outperform flow-matching on music quality and temporal control, while flow-matching offers faster inference and better inpainting flexibility.

  2. Go witheFlow: Real-time Emotion Driven Audio Effects Modulation

    cs.SD 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    witheFlow is a lightweight open-source proof-of-concept system for real-time emotion-driven modulation of audio effects in music performance by combining biosignals and audio features.

  3. Workflow-Based Evaluation of Music Generation Systems

    eess.AS 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A single-producer workflow evaluation of eight music AI tools finds they work as idea and sound generators but not as complete composers, and proposes a reusable framework.

Pith tools