Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Iterative Phase Retrieval Algorithms for Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.05250 v2 pith:BFKYRKLB submitted 2023-09-11 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords stemphaseimagingretrievalcontrastmethodssampleselectron
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) has been extensively used for imaging complex materials down to atomic resolution. The most commonly employed STEM modality, annular dark-field imaging, produces easily-interpretable contrast, but is dose-inefficient and produces little to no discernible contrast for light elements and weakly-scattering samples. An alternative is to use STEM phase retrieval imaging, enabled by high speed detectors able to record full images of a diffracted STEM probe over a grid of scan positions. Phase retrieval imaging in STEM is highly dose-efficient, enabling the measurement of the structure of beam-sensitive materials such as biological samples. Here, we comprehensively describe the theoretical background, algorithmic implementation details, and perform both simulated and experimental tests for three iterative phase retrieval STEM methods: focused-probe differential phase contrast, defocused-probe parallax imaging, and a generalized ptychographic gradient descent method implemented in two and three dimensions. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each of these approaches by comparing the transfer of information using analytical expressions and numerical results for a white-noise model. This presentation of STEM phase retrieval methods aims to make these methods more approachable, reproducible, and more readily adoptable for many classes of samples.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantitative structure determination from experimental four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy via the scattering matrix

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A scattering-matrix 4D STEM reconstruction pipeline, extended to handle spatial incoherence, unknown defocus, and dark-field signal, recovers the SrTiO3 projected potential from experimental data.

  2. Programmable Beam Control for Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy and Ptychography

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Ptychography tolerates large scan jumps and irregular trajectories, while EELS and ADF maps remain sensitive to scan-induced artifacts, so scan design should depend on the imaging modality.

  3. Beyond Contrast Transfer: Spectral SNR as a Dose-Aware Metric for STEM Phase Retrieval

    physics.optics 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using SSNR, the authors find that CTF overestimates low-dose STEM phase retrieval performance and that iterative ptychography's SSNR is dose-dependent, matching direct ptychography at low fluence.

  4. 4D-MISR: A unified model for low-dose super-resolution imaging via feature fusion

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    4D-MISR maps low-dose, multi-view virtual bright-field 4D-STEM data to high-resolution images using a CNN trained on simulated specimens, but the evaluation may be compromised by missing train/test separation.

Pith tools