Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Moonshot: Optimizing Chain-Based Rotating Leader BFT via Optimistic Proposals

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.01791 v2 pith:2CT3SEUD submitted 2024-01-03 cs.DC cs.NI

Moonshot: Optimizing Chain-Based Rotating Leader BFT via Optimistic Proposals

classification cs.DC cs.NI
keywords protocolsdeltachain-basedcommitlatencymodelsynchronousblock
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing chain-based rotating-leader BFT SMR protocols for the partially synchronous network model with constant commit latencies incur block periods of at least $2\delta$ (where $\delta$ is the message transmission latency). While a protocol with a block period of $\delta$ exists under the synchronous model, its commit latency is linear in the size of the system. To close this gap, we present the first chain-based BFT SMR protocols with $\delta$ delay between the proposals of consecutive honest leaders and commit latencies of $3\delta$. We present three protocols for the partially synchronous model under different notions of optimistic responsiveness, two of which implement pipelining. All of our protocols achieve reorg resilience and two have short view lengths; properties that many existing chain-based BFT SMR protocols lack. We present an evaluation of our protocols in a wide-area network wherein they demonstrate significant increases in throughput and reductions in latency compared to the state-of-the-art, Jolteon. Our results also demonstrate that techniques commonly employed to reduce communication complexity$\unicode{x2014}$such as vote-pipelining and the use of designated vote-aggregators$\unicode{x2014}$actually reduce practical performance in many settings.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Prefix Consensus For Censorship Resistant BFT

    cs.DC 2026-02 conditional novelty 8.0

    Prefix Consensus, a new primitive where parties output consistent low/high prefixes, is solvable asynchronously in exactly three rounds, and yields leaderless BFT consensus with at most f censored slots after GST.

  2. Multimmit: Extending Blocks for Faster Finality

    cs.DC 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Multimmit finalises transaction blocks in one voting round with roughly 3δ average latency from dissemination, confining a faulty producer's damage to its own chain.

  3. The Carnot Bound: Limits and Possibilities for Bandwidth-Efficient Consensus

    cs.DC 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    A lower bound of ~2.5 on data expansion for 2-round-finality consensus, plus two 3-round protocols that achieve expansion approaching 1 under good conditions.

  4. The Carnot Bound: Limits and Possibilities for Bandwidth-Efficient Consensus

    cs.DC 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.5

    Two-round-finality leader-based consensus cannot beat ~2.5 data expansion; three-round Carnot protocols reach near-1 under favorable conditions and 1.33–1.5 under attack.