Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Reinforcement Learning from LLM Feedback to Counteract Goal Misgeneralization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.07181 v1 pith:W6RHWMTH submitted 2024-01-14 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords agentgoalfeedbacklearningmisgeneralizationmodelduringfailure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce a method to address goal misgeneralization in reinforcement learning (RL), leveraging Large Language Model (LLM) feedback during training. Goal misgeneralization, a type of robustness failure in RL occurs when an agent retains its capabilities out-of-distribution yet pursues a proxy rather than the intended one. Our approach utilizes LLMs to analyze an RL agent's policies during training and identify potential failure scenarios. The RL agent is then deployed in these scenarios, and a reward model is learnt through the LLM preferences and feedback. This LLM-informed reward model is used to further train the RL agent on the original dataset. We apply our method to a maze navigation task, and show marked improvements in goal generalization, especially in cases where true and proxy goals are somewhat distinguishable and behavioral biases are pronounced. This study demonstrates how the LLM, despite its lack of task proficiency, can efficiently supervise RL agents, providing scalable oversight and valuable insights for enhancing goal-directed learning in RL through the use of LLMs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EAPO: Enhancing Policy Optimization with On-Demand Expert Assistance

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    EAPO lets a policy model consult a stronger expert during training, anneals that access to zero, and improves independent math reasoning by about 5 points over self-exploratory RL.

Pith tools