Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.00307 v5 pith:RQPHPQOQ submitted 2024-02-01 stat.ME

A More Robust Approach to Multivariable Mendelian Randomization

classification stat.ME
keywords instrumentsmultivariablemvmrweakestimatormanymendelianrandomization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to infer the direct effects of multiple exposures on an outcome. However, unlike univariable Mendelian randomization, MVMR often faces greater challenges with many weak instruments, which can lead to bias not necessarily toward zero and inflation of type I errors. In this work, we introduce a new asymptotic regime that allows exposures to have varying degrees of instrument strength, providing a more accurate theoretical framework for studying MVMR estimators. Under this regime, our analysis of the widely used multivariable inverse-variance weighted method shows that it is often biased and tends to produce misleadingly narrow confidence intervals in the presence of many weak instruments. To address this, we propose a simple, closed-form modification to the multivariable inverse-variance weighted estimator to reduce bias from weak instruments, and additionally introduce a novel spectral regularization technique to improve finite-sample performance. We show that the resulting spectral-regularized estimator remains consistent and asymptotically normal under many weak instruments. Through simulations and real data applications, we demonstrate that our proposed estimator and asymptotic framework can enhance the robustness of MVMR analyses.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Multivariable Mendelian randomization with weak instruments: a comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods

    stat.ME 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MVMR-Pony, a Bayesian method, reduces weak-instrument bias in multivariable Mendelian randomization more effectively than frequentist alternatives in simulation studies covering correlated effects, measurement error, ...