Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Distributionally Fair Stochastic Optimization using Wasserstein Distance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.01872 v3 pith:JTXWEZBX submitted 2024-02-02 math.OC

classification math.OC
keywords fairnessmeasurewassersteinbounddfsogelbrichgroupsindividuals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

A traditional stochastic program under a finite population typically seeks to optimize efficiency by maximizing the expected profits or minimizing the expected costs, subject to a set of constraints. However, implementing such optimization-based decisions can have varying impacts on individuals, and when assessed using the individuals' utility functions, these impacts may differ substantially across demographic groups delineated by sensitive attributes, such as gender, race, age, and socioeconomic status. As each group comprises multiple individuals, a common remedy is to enforce group fairness, which necessitates the measurement of disparities in the distributions of utilities across different groups. This paper introduces the concept of Distributionally Fair Stochastic Optimization (DFSO) based on the Wasserstein fairness measure. The DFSO aims to minimize distributional disparities among groups, quantified by the Wasserstein distance, while adhering to an acceptable level of inefficiency. Our analysis reveals that: (i) the Wasserstein fairness measure recovers the demographic parity fairness prevalent in binary classification literature; (ii) this measure can approximate the well-known Kolmogorov-Smirnov fairness measure with considerable accuracy; and (iii) despite DFSO's biconvex nature, the epigraph of the Wasserstein fairness measure is generally Mixed-Integer Convex Programming Representable (MICP-R). Additionally, we introduce two distinct lower bounds for the Wasserstein fairness measure: the Jensen bound, applicable to the general Wasserstein fairness measure, and the Gelbrich bound, specific to the type-2 Wasserstein fairness measure. We establish the exactness of the Gelbrich bound and quantify the theoretical difference between the Wasserstein fairness measure and the Gelbrich bound.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fair and Accurate Regression: Strong Formulations and Algorithms

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A convex-hull-based relaxation plus coordinate descent and exact mixed-integer formulations let fair regression models be trained much faster, with accuracy-fairness trade-offs competitive against a state-of-the-art r...

  2. Distributionally Fair Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading

    math.OC 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A group-fair trading layer using Wasserstein distances redistributes peer-to-peer electricity trades, reducing measured inequality by up to 70.1% on a 1600-peer IEEE 33-bus case study.

Pith tools