UEyes: An Eye-Tracking Dataset across User Interface Types

Antti Oulasvirta; Hamed R. Tavakoli; Julia Kylm\"al\"a; Luis A. Leiva; Paul R. B. Houssel; Yue Jiang

UEyes: An Eye-Tracking Dataset across User Interface Types

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.05202 v1 pith:EPE3UXYP submitted 2024-02-07 cs.HC

UEyes: An Eye-Tracking Dataset across User Interface Types

Yue Jiang , Luis A. Leiva , Paul R. B. Houssel , Hamed R. Tavakoli , Julia Kylm\"al\"a , Antti Oulasvirta This is my paper

classification cs.HC

keywords typesdatasetueyesacrossdifferencesuseraffectanalyze

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

0 comments

read the original abstract

Different types of user interfaces differ significantly in the number of elements and how they are displayed. To examine how such differences affect the way users look at UIs, we collected and analyzed a large eye-tracking-based dataset, UEyes (62 participants, 1,980 UI screenshots, near 20K eye movement sequences), covering four major UI types: webpage, desktop UI, mobile UI, and poster. Furthermore, we analyze and discuss the differences in important factors, such as color, location, and gaze direction across UI types, individual viewing strategies and potential future directions. This position paper is a derivative of our recent paper with a particular focus on the UEyes dataset.

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Just Keep Prompting: Evaluating Repetitive Socratic Prompting in VLMs
cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

Repeated conversational pressure destabilizes VLM video answers — correct answers regress, wrong ones sometimes recover, and models differ sharply in how they respond.