REVIEW 1 cited by
Nonlinear Regression Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Nonlinear Regression Analysis
read the original abstract
Nonlinear regression analysis is a popular and important tool for scientists and engineers. In this article, we introduce theories and methods of nonlinear regression and its statistical inferences using the frequentist and Bayesian statistical modeling and computation. Least squares with the Gauss-Newton method is the most widely used approach to parameters estimation. Under the assumption of normally distributed errors, maximum likelihood estimation is equivalent to least squares estimation. The Wald confidence regions for parameters in a nonlinear regression model are affected by the curvatures in the mean function. Furthermore, we introduce the Newton-Raphson method and the generalized least squares method to deal with variance heterogeneity. Examples of simulation data analysis are provided to illustrate important properties of confidence regions and the statistical inferences using the nonlinear least squares estimation and Bayesian inference.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Comparative study of Bayesian and Frequentist methods for epidemic forecasting: Insights from simulated and historical data
Neither Bayesian nor frequentist fitting is uniformly better for epidemic forecasts; performance depends on phase and data, though the paper's own results undercut its phase-specific claims.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.