REVIEW 2 cited by
5G-Advanced AI/ML Beam Management: Performance Evaluation with Integrated ML Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
5G-Advanced AI/ML Beam Management: Performance Evaluation with Integrated ML Models
read the original abstract
The legacy beam management (BM) procedure in 5G introduces higher measurement and reporting overheads for larger beam codebooks resulting in higher power consumption of user equipment (UEs). Hence, the 3rd generation partnership project (3GPP) studied the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in the air interface to reduce the overhead associated with the legacy BM procedure. The usage of AI/ML in BM is mainly discussed with regard to spatial-domain beam prediction (SBP) and time-domain beam prediction (TBP). In this study, we discuss different sub-use cases of SBP and TBP and evaluate the beam prediction accuracy of AI/ML models designed for each sub-use case along with AI/ML model generalization aspects. Moreover, a comprehensive system-level performance evaluation is presented in terms of user throughput with integrated AI/ML models to a 3GPP-compliant system-level simulator. Based on user throughput evaluations, we present AI/ML BM design guidelines for the deployment of lightweight, low-complexity AI/ML models discussed in this study.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
DL-Based Beam Management for mmWave Vehicular Networks Exploring Temporal Correlation
An LSTM-based beam tracker using classification or regression maintains high top-K accuracy in simulated mmWave V2I scenarios with up to 50% NLOS, while reducing measurement overhead by roughly two-thirds.
-
SABER: Symbolic Regression-based Angle of Arrival and Beam Pattern Estimator
AoA can be estimated from a single path loss value by fitting a cos^n inversion with symbolic regression, but the reported accuracy is only demonstrated on the training data and one fixed angle.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.