Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The role of LRG1 and LRG2's monopole in inferring the DESI 2024 BAO cosmology

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.02168 v2 pith:TIU6BEUL submitted 2024-05-03 astro-ph.CO

The role of LRG1 and LRG2's monopole in inferring the DESI 2024 BAO cosmology

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords lrg2datalrg1desicosmologysigmadarkenergy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) collaboration recently released its first year of data (DR1) on baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) in galaxy, quasar, and Lyman-$\alpha$ forest tracers. When combined with CMB and SNIa data, DESI BAO results suggest potential thawing behavior in dark energy. Cosmological analyses utilize comoving distances along ($D_H$) and perpendicular to ($D_M$) the line of sight. Notably, there are $1\sim2\sigma$ deviations in $D_M$ and $D_H$ from Planck cosmology values in the luminous red galaxies (LRG) bins LRG1 and LRG2.This study examines the role of LRG1 and LRG2 in diverging DESI 2024 BAO cosmology from Planck cosmology. We use angle-averaged distance $D_V$ and the ratio $F_{\rm AP}=D_M/D_H$, which are more directly related to the measured monopole and quadrupole components of the galaxy power spectrum or correlation function, instead of the officially adopted $D_M$ and $D_H$. This transformation aims to isolate the influence of monopoles in LRG1 and LRG2 on deviations from $w=-1$. Our findings indicate that removing the $D_V$ data point in LRG2 aligns DESI + CMB + SNIa data compilation with $w=-1$ within a $2\sigma$ contour and reduces the $H_0$ discrepancy from the Planck 2018 results from $0.63\sigma$ to $0.31\sigma$. Similarly, excluding the $D_V$ data point from LRG1 shifts the $w_0/w_a$ contour toward $w=-1$, although no intersection occurs. This highlights the preference of both LRG1 and LRG2 BAO monopole components for the thawing dark energy model, with LRG2 showing a stronger preference. We provide the $D_V$ and $F_{\rm AP}$ data and their covariance alongside this paper.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Sequentially-Valid Reanalysis of DESI's Dynamical Dark Energy Signal

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    An anytime-valid e-process reanalysis shows DESI's dynamical dark energy evidence is a fragile LRG2-bin, specification-dependent signal that does not survive a trials correction.

  2. DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

    astro-ph.CO 2024-04 accept novelty 7.0

    First-year DESI BAO data are consistent with flat LambdaCDM and, when combined with CMB, show a 2.5-3.9 sigma preference for evolving dark energy (w0 > -1, wa < 0) that strengthens with certain supernova datasets.

  3. New Insights into Dark Energy from DESI DR2 with CMB and SNIa

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Systematic dataset swaps show DESY5 low-redshift SNIa, Planck CMB plus lensing, and DESI-DR2 BAO as the dominant sources of w0waCDM tension with ΛCDM, while other combinations remain consistent.