REVIEW 3 cited by
The role of LRG1 and LRG2's monopole in inferring the DESI 2024 BAO cosmology
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
The role of LRG1 and LRG2's monopole in inferring the DESI 2024 BAO cosmology
read the original abstract
The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) collaboration recently released its first year of data (DR1) on baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) in galaxy, quasar, and Lyman-$\alpha$ forest tracers. When combined with CMB and SNIa data, DESI BAO results suggest potential thawing behavior in dark energy. Cosmological analyses utilize comoving distances along ($D_H$) and perpendicular to ($D_M$) the line of sight. Notably, there are $1\sim2\sigma$ deviations in $D_M$ and $D_H$ from Planck cosmology values in the luminous red galaxies (LRG) bins LRG1 and LRG2.This study examines the role of LRG1 and LRG2 in diverging DESI 2024 BAO cosmology from Planck cosmology. We use angle-averaged distance $D_V$ and the ratio $F_{\rm AP}=D_M/D_H$, which are more directly related to the measured monopole and quadrupole components of the galaxy power spectrum or correlation function, instead of the officially adopted $D_M$ and $D_H$. This transformation aims to isolate the influence of monopoles in LRG1 and LRG2 on deviations from $w=-1$. Our findings indicate that removing the $D_V$ data point in LRG2 aligns DESI + CMB + SNIa data compilation with $w=-1$ within a $2\sigma$ contour and reduces the $H_0$ discrepancy from the Planck 2018 results from $0.63\sigma$ to $0.31\sigma$. Similarly, excluding the $D_V$ data point from LRG1 shifts the $w_0/w_a$ contour toward $w=-1$, although no intersection occurs. This highlights the preference of both LRG1 and LRG2 BAO monopole components for the thawing dark energy model, with LRG2 showing a stronger preference. We provide the $D_V$ and $F_{\rm AP}$ data and their covariance alongside this paper.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
A Sequentially-Valid Reanalysis of DESI's Dynamical Dark Energy Signal
An anytime-valid e-process reanalysis shows DESI's dynamical dark energy evidence is a fragile LRG2-bin, specification-dependent signal that does not survive a trials correction.
-
DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations
First-year DESI BAO data are consistent with flat LambdaCDM and, when combined with CMB, show a 2.5-3.9 sigma preference for evolving dark energy (w0 > -1, wa < 0) that strengthens with certain supernova datasets.
-
New Insights into Dark Energy from DESI DR2 with CMB and SNIa
Systematic dataset swaps show DESY5 low-redshift SNIa, Planck CMB plus lensing, and DESI-DR2 BAO as the dominant sources of w0waCDM tension with ΛCDM, while other combinations remain consistent.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.