pith. sign in

arxiv: 2405.03881 · v2 · pith:I2IDCIPAnew · submitted 2024-05-06 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

High Fidelity Artificial Quantum Thermal State Generation using Encoded Coherent States

Haley Weinstein , Bruno Avritzer , Todd A. Brun , Jonathan L. Habif This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 01:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords quantum steganographythermal statescoherent statesquantum state tomographyoptical amplifierfidelityspontaneous emission
0
0 comments X

The pith

Encoded coherent laser states can be made to produce artificial thermal states with fidelity above 0.98.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to encode the phase and amplitude of weak coherent laser pulses so that a channel monitor sees only thermal noise. Quantum state tomography reconstructs the density matrices of these engineered states and of amplifier spontaneous emission. The measured states match theoretical thermal states at fidelity greater than 0.98. This technique lets quantum information travel while appearing as ordinary thermal light to any third party. A reader would care because it supplies a concrete optical method for hiding signals inside natural channel noise.

Core claim

By encoding the phase and amplitude of weak coherent laser states such that a third party monitoring the communications channel would see an amalgamation of states indistinguishable from thermal noise light. Using quantum state tomography, the authors experimentally reconstructed the density matrices for artificially engineered thermal states and spontaneous emission from an optical amplifier and verified a state fidelity F greater than 0.98 when compared with theoretical thermal states.

What carries the argument

Encoding of phase and amplitude on weak coherent states to force thermal statistics in the monitored channel.

If this is right

  • Optical channels can carry hidden quantum data while appearing to carry only thermal noise.
  • The same encoding produces controllable spontaneous-emission-like states for amplifier characterization.
  • Density-matrix reconstruction confirms the states are close enough to thermal for steganographic use.
  • The method works with standard laser sources and tomography setups already used in quantum optics labs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may be combined with existing quantum-key-distribution hardware to add a steganographic layer.
  • Testing in fiber links of varying length would reveal how distance affects the indistinguishability.
  • Higher-order photon correlation measurements could provide an independent check on thermal character.

Load-bearing premise

The encoded states must produce measurement outcomes that cannot be told apart from genuine thermal light by any monitoring party.

What would settle it

Perform quantum state tomography on the generated states and compute fidelity to the ideal thermal density matrix; if the value falls significantly below 0.98 or if the off-diagonal elements deviate from thermal predictions, the claim is false.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2405.03881 by Bruno Avritzer, Haley Weinstein, Jonathan L. Habif, Todd A. Brun.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A channel with amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) contains sideband, thermal state noise represented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Calculated fidelity (F) from Eq. 5 plotted for different number of samples (M) and mean photon numbers (¯n) As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Experimental setup. Diagram for generating real thermal states is highlighted in a red box ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Graphical representations of density matrices reconstructed from measurements by Quantum State To [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum steganography is a powerful method for information security where communications between a sender and receiver are disguised as naturally occurring noise in a channel. We encoded the phase and amplitude of weak coherent laser states such that a third party monitoring the communications channel, measuring the flow of optical states through the channel, would see an amalgamation of states indistinguishable from thermal noise light. Using quantum state tomography, we experimentally reconstructed the density matrices for artificially engineered thermal states and spontaneous emission from an optical amplifier and verified a state fidelity F>0.98 when compared with theoretical thermal states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims to demonstrate a quantum steganography technique in which the phase and amplitude of weak coherent laser states are encoded so that a third-party monitor would observe an amalgamation indistinguishable from thermal noise. Quantum state tomography is used to reconstruct the density matrices of these artificially engineered states and of spontaneous emission from an optical amplifier; the manuscript reports a fidelity F>0.98 relative to independently defined theoretical thermal states.

Significance. If the reported fidelity is statistically robust, the work supplies an experimental route to disguising quantum information as thermal light in an optical channel, which could be relevant to secure quantum communication protocols. The direct comparison of reconstructed density matrices to theoretical thermal states is a clear experimental strength when properly documented.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of state fidelity F>0.98 is presented without error bars, sample sizes, tomography reconstruction details, or data-exclusion criteria, so the statistical support for the experimental result cannot be evaluated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and the specific comment on the abstract. We address the point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of state fidelity F>0.98 is presented without error bars, sample sizes, tomography reconstruction details, or data-exclusion criteria, so the statistical support for the experimental result cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the abstract, due to space constraints, does not include error bars, sample sizes, or explicit tomography details. These elements are provided in the main text (Sections on experimental setup, quantum state tomography procedure, and fidelity analysis), where we report the number of measurements, reconstruction method (maximum likelihood estimation), and uncertainty estimation via repeated trials. To make the central claim more readily evaluable from the abstract itself, we will revise the abstract to include a brief statement of the fidelity with its statistical uncertainty and a short reference to the verification protocol. This is a targeted revision that strengthens presentation without altering the reported result. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental protocol that encodes coherent states to produce an optical field whose reconstructed density matrix matches the standard theoretical thermal state form (independent of the experiment) with measured fidelity F>0.98. Quantum state tomography yields the density matrix directly from measurement statistics; the comparison to the theoretical thermal state is a post-hoc verification against an externally defined target, not a fitted parameter or self-referential definition. No derivation chain, self-citation, ansatz, or uniqueness claim reduces any reported result to the inputs by construction. The central claim is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard quantum optics; no free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics and linear optics for coherent-state encoding and density-matrix reconstruction
    Invoked for state preparation, tomography, and fidelity calculation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5622 in / 1033 out tokens · 35545 ms · 2026-05-24T01:25:23.955657+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Steganographic Entanglement Sharing

    quant-ph 2024-09 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper proposes steganographic protocols for transmitting quantum entanglement disguised as thermal noise, enabling hidden nonclassical state teleportation even against an active eavesdropper.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Quantum steganog- raphy via coherent-and Fock-state encoding in an optical medium

    Bruno Avritzer and Todd A Brun. “Quantum steganog- raphy via coherent-and Fock-state encoding in an optical medium”. In:Physical Review A109.3 (2024), p. 032401

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Limits of reliable communication with low proba- bility of detection on AWGN channels

    Boulat A Bash, Dennis Goeckel, and Don Towsley. “Limits of reliable communication with low proba- bility of detection on AWGN channels”. In: IEEE journal on selected areas in communications 31.9 (2013), pp. 1921–1930

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Quantum-secure covert com- munication on bosonic channels

    Boulat A Bash et al. “Quantum-secure covert com- munication on bosonic channels”. In: Nature com- munications 6.1 (2015), p. 8626

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Square root law for communication with low prob- ability of detection on AWGN channels

    Boulat A. Bash, Dennis Goeckel, and Don Towsley. “Square root law for communication with low prob- ability of detection on AWGN channels”. In: 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Information The- ory Proceedings. 2012, pp. 448–452. doi: 10.1109/ ISIT.2012.6284228

    work page arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    A scalable maximum likelihood method for quantum state tomography

    Tillmann Baumgratz et al. “A scalable maximum likelihood method for quantum state tomography”. In: New Journal of Physics 125004 (15 2013). doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/12/125004. url: https: / / iopscience . iop . org / article / 10 . 1088 / 1367-2630/15/12/125004#back-to-top-target

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/12/125004 2013

  6. [6]

    Rate adaptation and reach increase by probabilistically shaped 64-QAM: An experimental demonstration

    Fred Buchali et al. “Rate adaptation and reach increase by probabilistically shaped 64-QAM: An experimental demonstration”. In: Journal of light- wave technology 34.7 (2015), pp. 1599–1609

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Bayesian homodyne and heterodyne tomography

    Joseph C. Chapman et al. “Bayesian homodyne and heterodyne tomography”. In:Opt. Express 30.9 (Apr. 2022), pp. 15184–15200. doi: 10.1364/OE. 456597. url: https : / / opg . optica . org / oe / abstract.cfm?URI=oe-30-9-15184

    work page doi:10.1364/oe 2022

  8. [8]

    M. Fox. Quantum Optics: An Introduction. Oxford Master Series in Physics. OUP Oxford, 2006. isbn: 9780198566731. url: https : / / books . google . com/books?id=2_ZP-LDF9jkC. 6

    work page 2006

  9. [9]

    Quantum-limited dis- crimination of laser light and thermal light

    Jonathan L. Habif et al. “Quantum-limited dis- crimination of laser light and thermal light”. In: Opt. Express 29.5 (Mar. 2021), pp. 7418–7427. doi: 10.1364/OE.417989. url: https://opg.optica. org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-29-5-7418

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.417989 2021

  10. [10]

    Demonstration of quantum-limited discrimination of multicopy pure versus mixed states

    Arunkumar Jagannathan et al. “Demonstration of quantum-limited discrimination of multicopy pure versus mixed states”. In: Physical Review A 105.3 (2022), p. 032446

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    John von Neumann and ROBERT T. BEYER. Math- ematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: New Edition. NED - New edition. Princeton University Press, 2018. isbn: 9780691178561. url: http:// www . jstor . org / stable / j . ctt1wq8zhp(visited on 09/13/2024)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    The Quantum Theory of Op- tical Communications

    Jeffrey H. Shapiro. “The Quantum Theory of Op- tical Communications”. In: IEEE Journal of Se- lected Topics in Quantum Electronics 15 (2009), pp. 1547–1569. url: https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:15898573

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    Quantum steganog- raphy with noisy quantum channels

    Bilal A Shaw and Todd A Brun. “Quantum steganog- raphy with noisy quantum channels”. In: Physical review A 83.2 (2011), p. 022310

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    The code book: the science of secrecy from ancient Egypt to quantum cryptography

    Simon Singh. The code book: the science of secrecy from ancient Egypt to quantum cryptography . An- chor, 2000

    work page 2000

  15. [15]

    Covert wireless communi- cation with artificial noise generation

    Ramin Soltani et al. “Covert wireless communi- cation with artificial noise generation”. In: IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 17.11 (2018), pp. 7252–7267

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Gen- erator of arbitrary classical photon statistics

    Ivo Straka, Jarom´ ır Mika, and Miroslav Jeˇ zek. “Gen- erator of arbitrary classical photon statistics”. In: Opt. Express 26.7 (Apr. 2018), pp. 8998–9010. doi: 10 . 1364 / OE . 26 . 008998. url: https : / / opg . optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe- 26- 7- 8998

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Quantum steganography over noiseless channels: Achievabil- ity and bounds

    Chris Sutherland and Todd A Brun. “Quantum steganography over noiseless channels: Achievabil- ity and bounds”. In:Physical Review A101.5 (2020), p. 052319

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Quantum steganography over noisy channels: Achievability and bounds

    Chris Sutherland and Todd A Brun. “Quantum steganography over noisy channels: Achievability and bounds”. In: Physical Review A 100.5 (2019), p. 052312

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Optical steganography based on amplified spontaneous emission noise

    Ben Wu et al. “Optical steganography based on amplified spontaneous emission noise”. In:Opt. Ex- press 21.2 (Jan. 2013), pp. 2065–2071. doi: 10 . 1364/OE.21.002065. url: https://opg.optica. org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-2-2065 . 7

    work page 2013