Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Carrying Capacity Calculator for Pedestrians Using OpenStreetMap Data: Application to Urban Tourism and Public Spaces

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.16781 v1 pith:3L7JXDZS submitted 2024-06-24 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords carryingcapacitymanagementtourismurbancalculatorpublicspaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Determining the carrying capacity of urban tourism destinations and public spaces is essential for sustainable management. This paper presents an online tool that calculates pedestrian carrying capacities for user-defined areas based on OpenStreetMap (OSM) data. The tool considers physical, real, and effective carrying capacities by incorporating parameters such as area per pedestrian, rotation factor, corrective factors, and management capacity. The carrying capacity calculator aids in balancing environmental, economic, social, and experiential factors to prevent overcrowding and preserve the quality of life for residents and visitors. This tool is particularly useful for tourism destination management, urban planning, and event management, ensuring positive visitor experiences and sustainable infrastructure development. We detail the implementation of the calculator, its underlying algorithm, and its application to the Santa Maria Maior parish in Lisbon, highlighting its effectiveness in managing urban tourism and public spaces.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. mFARM: Towards Multi-Faceted Fairness Assessment based on HARMs in Clinical Decision Support

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new multi-metric fairness framework for clinical LLMs, applied to two large MIMIC-IV-based benchmarks, shows that context scarcity hurts fairness more than quantization does.

Pith tools