REVIEW 2 cited by
Enhancing Continual Learning in Visual Question Answering with Modality-Aware Feature Distillation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Continual learning focuses on incrementally training a model on a sequence of tasks with the aim of learning new tasks while minimizing performance drop on previous tasks. Existing approaches at the intersection of Continual Learning and Visual Question Answering (VQA) do not study how the multimodal nature of the input affects the learning dynamics of a model. In this paper, we demonstrate that each modality evolves at different rates across a continuum of tasks and that this behavior occurs in established encoder-only models as well as modern recipes for developing Vision & Language (VL) models. Motivated by this observation, we propose a modality-aware feature distillation (MAFED) approach which outperforms existing baselines across models of varying scale in three multimodal continual learning settings. Furthermore, we provide ablations showcasing that modality-aware distillation complements experience replay. Overall, our results emphasize the importance of addressing modality-specific dynamics to prevent forgetting in multimodal continual learning.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MM-Prompt: Cross-Modal Prompt Tuning for Continual Visual Question Answering
MM-Prompt couples the visual and language prompt paths in continual VQA, and reports higher average accuracy and lower forgetting than existing prompt-based methods.
-
Continual Learning for Generative AI: From LLMs to MLLMs and Beyond
A survey that categorizes continual learning methods for generative models into architecture-based, regularization-based, and replay-based paradigms across four model families.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.