Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Random Reed-Solomon Codes Achieve the Half-Singleton Bound for Insertions and Deletions over Linear-Sized Alphabets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.07299 v1 pith:CZBDGWBU submitted 2024-07-10 cs.IT cs.DSmath.COmath.IT

classification cs.ITcs.DSmath.COmath.IT
keywords codesrandomalphabetsreed-solomonboundhalf-singletoninsdelprobability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

In this paper, we prove that with high probability, random Reed-Solomon codes approach the half-Singleton bound - the optimal rate versus error tradeoff for linear insdel codes - with linear-sized alphabets. More precisely, we prove that, for any $\epsilon>0$ and positive integers $n$ and $k$, with high probability, random Reed--Solomon codes of length $n$ and dimension $k$ can correct $(1-\varepsilon)n-2k+1$ adversarial insdel errors over alphabets of size $n+2^{\mathsf{poly}(1/\varepsilon)}k$. This significantly improves upon the alphabet size demonstrated in the work of Con, Shpilka, and Tamo (IEEE TIT, 2023), who showed the existence of Reed--Solomon codes with exponential alphabet size $\widetilde O\left(\binom{n}{2k-1}^2\right)$ precisely achieving the half-Singleton bound. Our methods are inspired by recent works on list-decoding Reed-Solomon codes. Brakensiek-Gopi-Makam (STOC 2023) showed that random Reed-Solomon codes are list-decodable up to capacity with exponential-sized alphabets, and Guo-Zhang (FOCS 2023) and Alrabiah-Guruswami-Li (STOC 2024) improved the alphabet-size to linear. We achieve a similar alphabet-size reduction by similarly establishing strong bounds on the probability that certain random rectangular matrices are full rank. To accomplish this in our insdel context, our proof combines the random matrix techniques from list-decoding with structural properties of Longest Common Subsequences.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Linear List Decodable Edit-Correcting Codes with Rate Approaching $1$

    cs.IT 2025-06 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    For every small eta, explicit binary linear list-decodable codes correct an eta fraction of insertions and deletions with rate 1-O(eta^(1/4)) and polynomial-time encoding and decoding.

  2. Anonymous Shamir's Secret Sharing via Reed-Solomon Codes Against Permutations, Insertions, and Deletions

    cs.IT 2024-12 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Existence of Reed-Solomon codes robust to permutation plus n-2k+1 insertions and deletions implies fully anonymous (k-1,2k-1,n) ramp secret-sharing schemes.

  3. Reed-Solomon Codes Against Insertions and Deletions: Full-Length and Rate-$1/2$ Codes

    cs.IT 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Full-length 2D Reed-Solomon codes: almost all orderings correct a linear fraction of insdel errors, and rate-1/2 codes correcting a single insdel error exist over fields of size Θ(k^4).

  4. Decoding Insertions/Deletions via List Recovery

    cs.IT 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Any (ρ, 2ρn+1, L)-list-recoverable code is a (ρ, L)-list-decodable insdel code, yielding the first polynomial-time insdel decoder for [n,k] Reed-Solomon codes with k > 2.

  5. Optimally Decoding Two-Dimensional Reed-Solomon Codes Against Deletion Errors

    cs.IT 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A linear-time decoder recovers the codeword of a specially constructed [n,2] Reed-Solomon code from any n-3 surviving symbols.

Pith tools