Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Evolution of Information Seeking in Software Development: Understanding the Role and Impact of AI Assistants

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.04032 v2 pith:GAUSGDKP submitted 2024-08-07 cs.SE cs.HC

classification cs.SEcs.HC
keywords informationseekingtoolsdevelopmentimpactpractitionerssoftwareai-assisted
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

About 32% of a software practitioners' day involves seeking and using information to support task completion. Although the information needs of software practitioners have been studied extensively, the impact of AI-assisted tools on their needs and information-seeking behaviors remains largely unexplored. To addresses this gap, we conducted a mixed-method study to understand AI-assisted information seeking behavior of practitioners and its impact on their perceived productivity and skill development. We found that developers are increasingly using AI tools to support their information seeking, citing increased efficiency as a key benefit. Our findings also amplify caveats that come with effectively using AI tools for information seeking, especially for learning and skill development, such as the importance of foundational developer knowledge that can guide and inform the information provided by AI tools. Our efforts have implications for the effective integration of AI tools into developer workflows as information retrieval systems and learning aids.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Human and Machine: How Software Engineers Perceive and Engage with AI-Assisted Code Reviews Compared to Their Peers

    cs.SE 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In interviews with 20 engineers, AI-assisted code reviews were found to reduce emotional strain but increase cognitive load, with adoption limited by trust and missing context.

  2. Towards Decoding Developer Cognition in the Age of AI Assistants

    cs.HC 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A proposal for a controlled study using EEG, eye tracking, and interaction logs to link developer expertise, cognitive load, and perceived versus actual productivity with AI coding assistants.

Pith tools