REVIEW 7 cited by
Profile Likelihoods in Cosmology: When, Why and How illustrated with ΛCDM, Massive Neutrinos and Dark Energy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Profile Likelihoods in Cosmology: When, Why and How illustrated with ΛCDM, Massive Neutrinos and Dark Energy
read the original abstract
Frequentist parameter inference using profile likelihoods has received increased attention in the cosmology literature recently since it can give important complementary information to Bayesian credible intervals. Here, we give a pedagogical review of frequentist parameter inference in cosmology and focus on when the graphical profile likelihood construction gives meaningful constraints, i.e. confidence intervals with correct coverage. This construction rests on the assumption of the asymptotic limit of a large data set such as in Wilks' theorem. We assess the validity of this assumption in the context of three cosmological models with Planck 2018 Plik_lite data: While our tests for the $\Lambda$CDM model indicate that the profile likelihood method gives correct coverage, $\Lambda$CDM with the sum of neutrino masses as a free parameter appears consistent with a Gaussian near a boundary motivating the use of the boundary-corrected or Feldman-Cousins graphical method; for $w_0$CDM with the equation of state of dark energy, $w_0$, as a free parameter, we find indication of a violation of the assumptions. Finally, we compare frequentist and Bayesian constraints of these models. Our results motivate care when using the graphical profile likelihood method in cosmology. Along with this paper, we publish our profile-likelihood code "pinc".
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
Cosmological analysis of the DESI DR1 Lyman alpha 1D power spectrum
DESI DR1 Lyman-alpha data yields Δ²★=0.379±0.032 and n★=-2.309±0.019 at k★=0.009 km⁻¹s and z=3, sharpening N_eff, α_s, and β_s constraints by factors of 1.18-1.90 when combined with other probes.
-
Alleviating prior dependencies for DESI DR1 clustering fits through reparameterization
A hybrid Jeffreys+baseline prior removes multi-σ prior-volume projection in DESI DR1 full-shape fits of H0, w0, and wa, yielding late-time expansion constraints consistent with HOD-informed Bayesian and frequentist analyses.
-
Alleviating prior dependencies for DESI DR1 clustering fits through reparameterization
Jeffreys prior over EFTofLSS coefficients mitigates projection effects in DESI DR1 power spectrum multipole fits, recentering posteriors for late-time expansion parameters.
-
Double the axions, half the tension: multi-field early dark energy eases the Hubble tension
Two-field axion-like early dark energy reduces Hubble tension to 1.5 sigma residual and improves high-ell CMB fits over single-field models.
-
Determination of neutron star radius from pulse profile modeling using profile likelihood
Profile-likelihood maximization over nuisance parameters in X-PSI recovers injected neutron-star radius to <1σ on synthetic data, with precision comparable to MultiNest Bayesian inference but ~400× lower CPU cost.
-
Lyman-$\alpha$ forest constraints on pure and mixed fuzzy dark matter
Lyman-alpha forest data yield m_FDM > 1.9e-21 eV (95% CL) for pure FDM and f_FDM upper limits of 0.07-0.65 for mixed FDM at log10(m_FDM/eV) = -23 to -21.
-
Constraints on Neutrino Physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 Full Shape
DESI DR2 BAO and full-shape data plus CMB yield ∑m_ν < 0.0642 eV (95% CL) under ΛCDM, in 3σ tension with oscillation lower limits, relaxed to <0.163 eV in w0waCDM.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.