Pith. sign in

REVIEW 12 cited by

Harnessing LLMs for API Interactions: A Framework for Classification and Synthetic Data Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.11703 v1 pith:XS2A65GV submitted 2024-09-18 cs.CL

Chunliang Tao , Xiaojing Fan , Yahe Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CL
keywords llmslanguageclassifyingnaturalsoftwaresystemcallsclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As Large Language Models (LLMs) advance in natural language processing, there is growing interest in leveraging their capabilities to simplify software interactions. In this paper, we propose a novel system that integrates LLMs for both classifying natural language inputs into corresponding API calls and automating the creation of sample datasets tailored to specific API functions. By classifying natural language commands, our system allows users to invoke complex software functionalities through simple inputs, improving interaction efficiency and lowering the barrier to software utilization. Our dataset generation approach also enables the efficient and systematic evaluation of different LLMs in classifying API calls, offering a practical tool for developers or business owners to assess the suitability of LLMs for customized API management. We conduct experiments on several prominent LLMs using generated sample datasets for various API functions. The results show that GPT-4 achieves a high classification accuracy of 0.996, while LLaMA-3-8B performs much worse at 0.759. These findings highlight the potential of LLMs to transform API management and validate the effectiveness of our system in guiding model testing and selection across diverse applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 12 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-OphthaLingua: A Multilingual Benchmark for Assessing and Debiasing LLM Ophthalmological QA in LMICs

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new seven-language ophthalmology benchmark shows LLMs are less accurate in LMIC languages, and an agentic translation-plus-RAG pipeline reduces the gap.

  2. Evaluation of LLMs for mathematical problem solving

    cs.AI 2025-05 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A three-model, three-dataset LLM math evaluation using a multi-dimensional reasoning rubric, undermined by contradictory accuracy tables.

  3. Feature Alignment-Based Knowledge Distillation for Efficient Compression of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A multi-layer feature alignment knowledge distillation loss is reported to make a compact student model nearly match GPT-4 on perplexity, BLEU, ROUGE, and CER, but the experimental details are not provided.

  4. Collaborative Optimization in Financial Data Mining Through Deep Learning and ResNeXt

    cs.LG 2024-12 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A ResNeXt-based multi-task learning model reportedly outperforms LSTM, Transformer, MCCNN, and DSN on S&P 500 classification and regression, but the experiments lack error bars, code, and leakage controls.

  5. Optimizing Large Language Models with an Enhanced LoRA Fine-Tuning Algorithm for Efficiency and Robustness in NLP Tasks

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A modified LoRA update with per-matrix learning rates and an object-detection-style density term is reported to slightly improve QQP accuracy over GPT-4 baselines.

  6. Computer Vision-Driven Gesture Recognition: Toward Natural and Intuitive Human-Computer

    cs.CV 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A CNN-LSTM gesture recognizer with a decorative 3D skeleton visualization that reports unverifiable accuracy and speed numbers.

  7. Leveraging Convolutional Neural Network-Transformer Synergy for Predictive Modeling in Risk-Based Applications

    q-fin.RM 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A CNN+Transformer hybrid is reported to outperform tree-based baselines on credit default prediction, with accuracy 0.8197 and AUC 0.7921.

  8. Dynamic User Interface Generation for Enhanced Human-Computer Interaction Using Variational Autoencoders

    cs.HC 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A vanilla VAE trained on the RICO dataset is reported to beat AE, GAN, cGAN, DBN, and VAE-GAN on SSIM/MAE for UI generation, but the comparison is under-specified and the dynamic feedback claim is untested.

  9. AI-Driven Health Monitoring of Distributed Computing Architecture: Insights from XGBoost and SHAP

    cs.DC 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    An XGBoost model with SHAP explanations is applied to edge node health classification, but the weak reported accuracy and missing experimental details do not support the paper's claims.

  10. Optimizing Multi-Task Learning for Enhanced Performance in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A multi-task GPT-4 model is said to beat single-task GPT-4, GPT-3, BERT, and Bi-LSTM on classification and summarization, but the experimental evidence is not reported.

  11. A Matrix Logic Approach to Efficient Frequent Itemset Discovery in Large Data Sets

    cs.DB 2024-12 reject novelty 1.0 of 10

    The paper restates the standard Boolean matrix (vertical bit-vector) approach to frequent itemset mining and reports self-measured runtime and memory on the Groceries dataset without any baseline comparison.

  12. Enhanced Recommendation Combining Collaborative Filtering and Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2024-12 reject novelty 1.0 of 10

    A simple weighted sum of collaborative filtering scores and LLM text embeddings is claimed to improve recommendation accuracy, but the reported experiments are not reproducible.

Pith tools